From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>,
Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>,
linux-coco@lists.linux.dev,
Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com>,
Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>,
Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@nvidia.com>,
Alper Gun <alpergun@google.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>,
Emi Kisanuki <fj0570is@fujitsu.com>,
Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 02/43] arm64: RME: Handle Granule Protection Faults (GPFs)
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2025 12:38:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aLGRNc5u1EPlCpyb@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250820145606.180644-3-steven.price@arm.com>
On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 03:55:22PM +0100, Steven Price wrote:
> If the host attempts to access granules that have been delegated for use
> in a realm these accesses will be caught and will trigger a Granule
> Protection Fault (GPF).
>
> A fault during a page walk signals a bug in the kernel and is handled by
> oopsing the kernel. A non-page walk fault could be caused by user space
> having access to a page which has been delegated to the kernel and will
> trigger a SIGBUS to allow debugging why user space is trying to access a
> delegated page.
>
> Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
> ---
> Changes since v2:
> * Include missing "Granule Protection Fault at level -1"
> ---
> arch/arm64/mm/fault.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
> index d816ff44faff..e4237637cd8f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
> @@ -854,6 +854,25 @@ static int do_tag_check_fault(unsigned long far, unsigned long esr,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int do_gpf_ptw(unsigned long far, unsigned long esr, struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> + const struct fault_info *inf = esr_to_fault_info(esr);
> +
> + die_kernel_fault(inf->name, far, esr, regs);
> + return 0;
> +}
This is fine, it's irrelevant whether the fault happened at EL0 or EL1.
> +static int do_gpf(unsigned long far, unsigned long esr, struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> + const struct fault_info *inf = esr_to_fault_info(esr);
> +
> + if (!is_el1_instruction_abort(esr) && fixup_exception(regs, esr))
> + return 0;
> +
> + arm64_notify_die(inf->name, regs, inf->sig, inf->code, far, esr);
> + return 0;
> +}
The end result is somewhat similar but why not just return 1 and avoid
the arm64_notify_die() call? Let do_mem_abort() handle the oops vs user
signal. With die_kernel_fault() we print the "Unable to handle
kernel..." message and some more information.
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-29 11:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-20 14:55 [PATCH v10 00/43] arm64: Support for Arm CCA in KVM Steven Price
2025-08-20 14:55 ` [PATCH v10 01/43] kvm: arm64: Include kvm_emulate.h in kvm/arm_psci.h Steven Price
2025-08-20 14:55 ` [PATCH v10 02/43] arm64: RME: Handle Granule Protection Faults (GPFs) Steven Price
2025-08-29 11:38 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2025-09-15 10:55 ` Steven Price
2025-08-20 14:55 ` [PATCH v10 03/43] arm64: RME: Add SMC definitions for calling the RMM Steven Price
2025-08-20 14:55 ` [PATCH v10 04/43] arm64: RME: Add wrappers for RMI calls Steven Price
2025-08-20 14:55 ` [PATCH v10 05/43] arm64: RME: Check for RME support at KVM init Steven Price
2025-09-03 11:15 ` Gavin Shan
2025-09-15 10:55 ` Steven Price
2025-08-20 14:55 ` [PATCH v10 06/43] arm64: RME: Define the user ABI Steven Price
2025-08-20 14:55 ` [PATCH v10 07/43] arm64: RME: ioctls to create and configure realms Steven Price
2025-08-20 14:55 ` [PATCH v10 08/43] kvm: arm64: Don't expose debug capabilities for realm guests Steven Price
2025-08-20 14:55 ` [PATCH v10 09/43] KVM: arm64: Allow passing machine type in KVM creation Steven Price
2025-08-20 14:55 ` [PATCH v10 10/43] arm64: RME: RTT tear down Steven Price
2025-08-20 14:55 ` [PATCH v10 11/43] arm64: RME: Allocate/free RECs to match vCPUs Steven Price
2025-08-20 14:55 ` [PATCH v10 12/43] KVM: arm64: vgic: Provide helper for number of list registers Steven Price
2025-08-20 14:55 ` [PATCH v10 13/43] arm64: RME: Support for the VGIC in realms Steven Price
2025-08-20 14:55 ` [PATCH v10 14/43] KVM: arm64: Support timers in realm RECs Steven Price
2025-08-20 14:55 ` [PATCH v10 15/43] arm64: RME: Allow VMM to set RIPAS Steven Price
2025-09-03 23:36 ` Gavin Shan
2025-08-20 14:55 ` [PATCH v10 16/43] arm64: RME: Handle realm enter/exit Steven Price
2025-08-20 14:55 ` [PATCH v10 17/43] arm64: RME: Handle RMI_EXIT_RIPAS_CHANGE Steven Price
2025-08-20 14:55 ` [PATCH v10 18/43] KVM: arm64: Handle realm MMIO emulation Steven Price
2025-08-20 14:55 ` [PATCH v10 19/43] arm64: RME: Allow populating initial contents Steven Price
2025-08-20 14:55 ` [PATCH v10 20/43] arm64: RME: Runtime faulting of memory Steven Price
2025-08-20 14:55 ` [PATCH v10 21/43] KVM: arm64: Handle realm VCPU load Steven Price
2025-08-20 14:55 ` [PATCH v10 22/43] KVM: arm64: Validate register access for a Realm VM Steven Price
2025-08-20 14:55 ` [PATCH v10 23/43] KVM: arm64: Handle Realm PSCI requests Steven Price
2025-08-20 14:55 ` [PATCH v10 24/43] KVM: arm64: WARN on injected undef exceptions Steven Price
2025-08-20 14:55 ` [PATCH v10 25/43] arm64: Don't expose stolen time for realm guests Steven Price
2025-08-20 14:55 ` [PATCH v10 26/43] arm64: RME: allow userspace to inject aborts Steven Price
2025-08-20 14:55 ` [PATCH v10 27/43] arm64: RME: support RSI_HOST_CALL Steven Price
2025-08-20 14:55 ` [PATCH v10 28/43] arm64: RME: Allow checking SVE on VM instance Steven Price
2025-08-20 14:55 ` [PATCH v10 29/43] arm64: RME: Always use 4k pages for realms Steven Price
2025-08-20 14:55 ` [PATCH v10 30/43] arm64: RME: Prevent Device mappings for Realms Steven Price
2025-08-20 14:55 ` [PATCH v10 31/43] arm_pmu: Provide a mechanism for disabling the physical IRQ Steven Price
2025-09-22 0:03 ` Gavin Shan
2025-08-20 14:55 ` [PATCH v10 32/43] arm64: RME: Enable PMU support with a realm guest Steven Price
2025-09-22 0:03 ` Gavin Shan
2025-08-20 14:55 ` [PATCH v10 33/43] arm64: RME: Hide KVM_CAP_READONLY_MEM for realm guests Steven Price
2025-08-20 14:55 ` [PATCH v10 34/43] arm64: RME: Propagate number of breakpoints and watchpoints to userspace Steven Price
2025-08-20 14:55 ` [PATCH v10 35/43] arm64: RME: Set breakpoint parameters through SET_ONE_REG Steven Price
2025-08-20 14:55 ` [PATCH v10 36/43] arm64: RME: Initialize PMCR.N with number counter supported by RMM Steven Price
2025-08-20 14:55 ` [PATCH v10 37/43] arm64: RME: Propagate max SVE vector length from RMM Steven Price
2025-08-20 14:55 ` [PATCH v10 38/43] arm64: RME: Configure max SVE vector length for a Realm Steven Price
2025-08-20 14:55 ` [PATCH v10 39/43] arm64: RME: Provide register list for unfinalized RME RECs Steven Price
2025-08-20 14:56 ` [PATCH v10 40/43] arm64: RME: Provide accurate register list Steven Price
2025-08-20 14:56 ` [PATCH v10 41/43] KVM: arm64: Expose support for private memory Steven Price
2025-08-20 14:56 ` [PATCH v10 42/43] KVM: arm64: Expose KVM_ARM_VCPU_REC to user space Steven Price
2025-08-20 14:56 ` [PATCH v10 43/43] KVM: arm64: Allow activating realms Steven Price
2025-09-04 0:46 ` [PATCH v10 00/43] arm64: Support for Arm CCA in KVM Gavin Shan
2025-09-15 10:55 ` Steven Price
2025-09-24 2:34 ` Emi Kisanuki (Fujitsu)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aLGRNc5u1EPlCpyb@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=alpergun@google.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--cc=christoffer.dall@arm.com \
--cc=fj0570is@fujitsu.com \
--cc=gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=sdonthineni@nvidia.com \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=vannapurve@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).