From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pj1-f46.google.com (mail-pj1-f46.google.com [209.85.216.46]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4C182522B4; Thu, 11 Sep 2025 12:13:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.216.46 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757592813; cv=none; b=UBKWjuYIbVPqrjfQ8HKiNJzxR54hcWfWt+37rKRwLk3LZMtefF7iW2W/qg9pC5LaVDyTnnT4kEoXCg9Qx3ZFy9XFyZnGdziBMeguQRLg8V/itYVWsULkTNXsDWWrWHBM3eP2H35d6VdiE0V4CB+LQtWNHZ7bfB68Hqr2OqwmdYU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757592813; c=relaxed/simple; bh=2uYswM+1jOQM5cAWKOX/XlNNzu/lE3yQ81nRx9mx7nM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=sRUXemHrv1PVv6Zz75sMiuJpFfYyWUgbEn2xulNqesHUU5BiOuOpp3X27rkZpe7rbCrkEQ6hFHp8b3AU2F3sU1j45WV1sIsE30mfTlRexTCupgbITOzUYcg3sQbqKaBp4MDyiMMOume6niT9EcoQ7FvnvyB1ml6GAKw4NRj0UhE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=cCnTjI2D; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.216.46 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="cCnTjI2D" Received: by mail-pj1-f46.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-32dd1238843so582489a91.3; Thu, 11 Sep 2025 05:13:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1757592809; x=1758197609; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=eXZ0xggp2FT+wrAsK84tQSrwXGl2KswIB/w1VgAAZAA=; b=cCnTjI2Dlei8FDSd2uC46d67W2xJ743PfuVFnttlhabv4vBEbMMIpBKzzYS1nohvrV oscJIWLVvbB+vmUJXy7vrd27oDK7xmWXmOrwe1EaDk/8LQR90TgRxNfiEYyfQC2NKmbs sUZ/1YfNRh+8oPhEp+phIh1aziL0RLACEOV/Wb+bByaoW9U1eX9RTV2Bgc8ni01ImyEV sHxXwN5g5GPn9xm1WZrx5uYGOMzP8aZ63ut4+hDmu9BRaRk1MEKxCRlyKJ01qmNG2JQo 3M8KPvdlcx3rWZWky988/lbTns8H8G6U5G5llOJxxQDC/xPcQ53OMYAWb/m3pDY5T+ba 52Cg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1757592809; x=1758197609; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=eXZ0xggp2FT+wrAsK84tQSrwXGl2KswIB/w1VgAAZAA=; b=hiLL1hsk+0h3t5p/dUgQnHoQSxdFIrz/ktG4oeXJFMpB8Rh8lbBwfeqqtXqJNthwvq sVTEpW2KTokzfkl0wqkH0rQQC4AmvIudw7LP9Vh5aG3nU8CzbtBPJ+/1+k94TMCv7Gon Z6LmpRhjGiXE0w9uhSeRyFN5Ga8GJoCy0aKUHWARtWyynOxQh+iqUT8sKZ9OTygkQ4ck O2glAf+dt7hUw3WVtMTGkVAqM0zXWChTNhLG39nQr06nI9opsCNzCohwPgpQOLcpG8na fZXfo4evUjAGp8lzEMowoBtBLL6+KTOyBz0g6lPetPknWgPC95kHIDt7ET5Ppy666ijY GTzA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUCChCaiqPRGpvLYchdRVOc7szPLf4OqaaxdCK1YjUSOKcd6uw+3Qtl6ZHI+ZsHGOYkIrVKy0/0Ohfw4Ws=@vger.kernel.org, AJvYcCWZsbWh71rvG5qULWOnQ8HYNmq1jdro0LRJbZqajX9igZ7uP0os7oojvqQBisNKLfkQnKbdV0aiFa0zpQ==@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxEB/CmFbc8QTMTjbIJiZaWzIQYk3Qpaxhac+xE+dFK4+1F/oSW k8w7CRiEGQjDfrC2wAkVVTP+ToZme+z/SQ6F1AhwPoctTY6pqHhrS9+kQQHj2w== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvpIiYEUT0GsOdC1OH7JIFJiwhwMe1aarSLrTmpSxPnyPBhUY9HeojBEaCQNnh E4SSECHK+wQc352jpv3XERLPhQJDLxPjscE2NgE39LXPTNkKWiGbeUDhrQaIC1iI6eDUtbsZ6CX xX3bhdI1NMF/N8UFXmhgOM1PGqSvS7o9yYG2jgGwEAm3bgcsm4jUgYvczJCW82aDETvMAMdQLYc CHjN6O0naXMm+ti4bZ6JimU3tvDnMNXTLVmgywVA1Q1gHoowe1ZhiAQGBnt6hODmKU9meYr3LQP 5725GH+5Bqp5asMARuxTB4Hq7MA0bt6XDRDiKl9v8VWTNUzkKXSIpCEEh0Li7ONkcY1Jv/kPCtT jNcjY7ffhHk9C2faqcijzQ0r9RA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHI15p/BSRhnfNn15WZGX4hol/fmK9dvgSsWJQzgstI5IPs2mAcKuRKwY7mOpqEm6PL2oPdYg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:33cf:b0:32b:9774:d33d with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-32d43f6658cmr24778035a91.20.1757592809145; Thu, 11 Sep 2025 05:13:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from archie.me ([103.124.138.155]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 98e67ed59e1d1-32dd9809e5asm2006870a91.3.2025.09.11.05.13.27 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 11 Sep 2025 05:13:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by archie.me (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B5F7C420A6BE; Thu, 11 Sep 2025 19:13:25 +0700 (WIB) Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2025 19:13:25 +0700 From: Bagas Sanjaya To: Stephen Rothwell , Christian Brauner Cc: Simon Schuster , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the vfs-brauner tree Message-ID: References: <20250904113334.18822d43@canb.auug.org.au> <20250908120229.7a4e6db9@canb.auug.org.au> <20250910104944.3e420e96@canb.auug.org.au> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="MRaT2zXPHw09yZSn" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250910104944.3e420e96@canb.auug.org.au> --MRaT2zXPHw09yZSn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 10:49:44AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, >=20 > On Mon, 8 Sep 2025 12:02:29 +1000 Stephen Rothwell = wrote: > > > > On Thu, 4 Sep 2025 11:33:34 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > >=20 > > > After merging the vfs-brauner tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > > > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > >=20 > > > In file included from include/rv/ltl_monitor.h:11, > > > from kernel/trace/rv/monitors/sleep/sleep.c:23: > > > include/rv/ltl_monitor.h: In function 'ltl_monitor_init': > > > include/rv/ltl_monitor.h:75:51: error: passing argument 1 of 'check_t= race_callback_type_task_newtask' from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompat= ible-pointer-types] > > > 75 | rv_attach_trace_probe(name, task_newtask, handle_task= _newtask); > > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~= ~~~~~~~~ > > > | | > > > | void (*)(vo= id *, struct task_struct *, long unsigned int) > > > include/rv/instrumentation.h:18:48: note: in definition of macro 'rv_= attach_trace_probe' > > > 18 | check_trace_callback_type_##tp(rv_handler); = \ > > > | ^~~~~~~~~~ > > > In file included from kernel/trace/rv/monitors/sleep/sleep.c:3: > > > include/linux/tracepoint.h:260:49: note: expected 'void (*)(void *, s= truct task_struct *, u64)' {aka 'void (*)(void *, struct task_struct *, lon= g long unsigned int)'} but argument is of type 'void (*)(void *, struct tas= k_struct *, long unsigned int)' > > > 260 | check_trace_callback_type_##name(void (*cb)(data_prot= o)) \ > > > | ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~= ~~ > > > include/linux/tracepoint.h:270:9: note: in expansion of macro '__DECL= ARE_TRACE_COMMON' > > > 270 | __DECLARE_TRACE_COMMON(name, PARAMS(proto), PARAMS(ar= gs), PARAMS(data_proto)) \ > > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > include/linux/tracepoint.h:481:9: note: in expansion of macro '__DECL= ARE_TRACE' > > > 481 | __DECLARE_TRACE(name, PARAMS(proto), PARAMS(args), = \ > > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > include/linux/tracepoint.h:619:9: note: in expansion of macro 'DECLAR= E_TRACE_EVENT' > > > 619 | DECLARE_TRACE_EVENT(name, PARAMS(proto), PARAMS(args)) > > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > include/trace/events/task.h:9:1: note: in expansion of macro 'TRACE_E= VENT' > > > 9 | TRACE_EVENT(task_newtask, > > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~ > > > In file included from include/asm-generic/bug.h:7, > > > from arch/x86/include/asm/bug.h:103, > > > from arch/x86/include/asm/alternative.h:9, > > > from arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h:5, > > > from include/asm-generic/bitops/generic-non-atomic.h= :7, > > > from include/linux/bitops.h:28, > > > from include/linux/kernel.h:23, > > > from include/linux/interrupt.h:6, > > > from include/linux/trace_recursion.h:5, > > > from include/linux/ftrace.h:10, > > > from kernel/trace/rv/monitors/sleep/sleep.c:2: > > > include/rv/ltl_monitor.h:75:51: error: passing argument 1 of 'registe= r_trace_task_newtask' from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointe= r-types] > > > 75 | rv_attach_trace_probe(name, task_newtask, handle_task= _newtask); > > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~= ~~~~~~~~ > > > | | > > > | void (*)(vo= id *, struct task_struct *, long unsigned int) > > > include/linux/once_lite.h:28:41: note: in definition of macro 'DO_ONC= E_LITE_IF' > > > 28 | bool __ret_do_once =3D !!(condition); = \ > > > | ^~~~~~~~~ > > > include/rv/instrumentation.h:19:17: note: in expansion of macro 'WARN= _ONCE' > > > 19 | WARN_ONCE(register_trace_##tp(rv_handler, NUL= L), \ > > > | ^~~~~~~~~ > > > include/rv/ltl_monitor.h:75:9: note: in expansion of macro 'rv_attach= _trace_probe' > > > 75 | rv_attach_trace_probe(name, task_newtask, handle_task= _newtask); > > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > include/linux/tracepoint.h:241:38: note: expected 'void (*)(void *, s= truct task_struct *, u64)' {aka 'void (*)(void *, struct task_struct *, lon= g long unsigned int)'} but argument is of type 'void (*)(void *, struct tas= k_struct *, long unsigned int)' > > > 241 | register_trace_##name(void (*probe)(data_proto), void= *data) \ > > > | ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > include/linux/tracepoint.h:270:9: note: in expansion of macro '__DECL= ARE_TRACE_COMMON' > > > 270 | __DECLARE_TRACE_COMMON(name, PARAMS(proto), PARAMS(ar= gs), PARAMS(data_proto)) \ > > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > include/linux/tracepoint.h:481:9: note: in expansion of macro '__DECL= ARE_TRACE' > > > 481 | __DECLARE_TRACE(name, PARAMS(proto), PARAMS(args), = \ > > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > include/linux/tracepoint.h:619:9: note: in expansion of macro 'DECLAR= E_TRACE_EVENT' > > > 619 | DECLARE_TRACE_EVENT(name, PARAMS(proto), PARAMS(args)) > > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > include/trace/events/task.h:9:1: note: in expansion of macro 'TRACE_E= VENT' > > > 9 | TRACE_EVENT(task_newtask, > > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~ > > > include/rv/ltl_monitor.h: In function 'ltl_monitor_destroy': > > > include/rv/ltl_monitor.h:92:51: error: passing argument 1 of 'unregis= ter_trace_task_newtask' from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-poin= ter-types] > > > 92 | rv_detach_trace_probe(name, task_newtask, handle_task= _newtask); > > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~= ~~~~~~~~ > > > | | > > > | void (*)(vo= id *, struct task_struct *, long unsigned int) > > > include/rv/instrumentation.h:28:39: note: in definition of macro 'rv_= detach_trace_probe' > > > 28 | unregister_trace_##tp(rv_handler, NULL); = \ > > > | ^~~~~~~~~~ > > > include/linux/tracepoint.h:254:40: note: expected 'void (*)(void *, s= truct task_struct *, u64)' {aka 'void (*)(void *, struct task_struct *, lon= g long unsigned int)'} but argument is of type 'void (*)(void *, struct tas= k_struct *, long unsigned int)' > > > 254 | unregister_trace_##name(void (*probe)(data_proto), vo= id *data) \ > > > | ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > include/linux/tracepoint.h:270:9: note: in expansion of macro '__DECL= ARE_TRACE_COMMON' > > > 270 | __DECLARE_TRACE_COMMON(name, PARAMS(proto), PARAMS(ar= gs), PARAMS(data_proto)) \ > > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > include/linux/tracepoint.h:481:9: note: in expansion of macro '__DECL= ARE_TRACE' > > > 481 | __DECLARE_TRACE(name, PARAMS(proto), PARAMS(args), = \ > > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > include/linux/tracepoint.h:619:9: note: in expansion of macro 'DECLAR= E_TRACE_EVENT' > > > 619 | DECLARE_TRACE_EVENT(name, PARAMS(proto), PARAMS(args)) > > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > include/trace/events/task.h:9:1: note: in expansion of macro 'TRACE_E= VENT' > > > 9 | TRACE_EVENT(task_newtask, > > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~ > > > In file included from include/rv/ltl_monitor.h:11, > > > from kernel/trace/rv/monitors/pagefault/pagefault.c:= 19: > > > include/rv/ltl_monitor.h: In function 'ltl_monitor_init': > > > include/rv/ltl_monitor.h:75:51: error: passing argument 1 of 'check_t= race_callback_type_task_newtask' from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompat= ible-pointer-types] > > > 75 | rv_attach_trace_probe(name, task_newtask, handle_task= _newtask); > > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~= ~~~~~~~~ > > > | | > > > | void (*)(vo= id *, struct task_struct *, long unsigned int) > > > include/rv/instrumentation.h:18:48: note: in definition of macro 'rv_= attach_trace_probe' > > > 18 | check_trace_callback_type_##tp(rv_handler); = \ > > > | ^~~~~~~~~~ > > > In file included from kernel/trace/rv/monitors/pagefault/pagefault.c:= 9: > > > include/linux/tracepoint.h:260:49: note: expected 'void (*)(void *, s= truct task_struct *, u64)' {aka 'void (*)(void *, struct task_struct *, lon= g long unsigned int)'} but argument is of type 'void (*)(void *, struct tas= k_struct *, long unsigned int)' > > > 260 | check_trace_callback_type_##name(void (*cb)(data_prot= o)) \ > > > | ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~= ~~ > > > include/linux/tracepoint.h:270:9: note: in expansion of macro '__DECL= ARE_TRACE_COMMON' > > > 270 | __DECLARE_TRACE_COMMON(name, PARAMS(proto), PARAMS(ar= gs), PARAMS(data_proto)) \ > > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > include/linux/tracepoint.h:481:9: note: in expansion of macro '__DECL= ARE_TRACE' > > > 481 | __DECLARE_TRACE(name, PARAMS(proto), PARAMS(args), = \ > > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > include/linux/tracepoint.h:619:9: note: in expansion of macro 'DECLAR= E_TRACE_EVENT' > > > 619 | DECLARE_TRACE_EVENT(name, PARAMS(proto), PARAMS(args)) > > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > include/trace/events/task.h:9:1: note: in expansion of macro 'TRACE_E= VENT' > > > 9 | TRACE_EVENT(task_newtask, > > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~ > > > In file included from include/asm-generic/bug.h:7, > > > from arch/x86/include/asm/bug.h:103, > > > from arch/x86/include/asm/alternative.h:9, > > > from arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h:5, > > > from include/asm-generic/bitops/generic-non-atomic.h= :7, > > > from include/linux/bitops.h:28, > > > from include/linux/kernel.h:23, > > > from include/linux/interrupt.h:6, > > > from include/linux/trace_recursion.h:5, > > > from include/linux/ftrace.h:10, > > > from kernel/trace/rv/monitors/pagefault/pagefault.c:= 2: > > > include/rv/ltl_monitor.h:75:51: error: passing argument 1 of 'registe= r_trace_task_newtask' from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointe= r-types] > > > 75 | rv_attach_trace_probe(name, task_newtask, handle_task= _newtask); > > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~= ~~~~~~~~ > > > | | > > > | void (*)(vo= id *, struct task_struct *, long unsigned int) > > > include/linux/once_lite.h:28:41: note: in definition of macro 'DO_ONC= E_LITE_IF' > > > 28 | bool __ret_do_once =3D !!(condition); = \ > > > | ^~~~~~~~~ > > > include/rv/instrumentation.h:19:17: note: in expansion of macro 'WARN= _ONCE' > > > 19 | WARN_ONCE(register_trace_##tp(rv_handler, NUL= L), \ > > > | ^~~~~~~~~ > > > include/rv/ltl_monitor.h:75:9: note: in expansion of macro 'rv_attach= _trace_probe' > > > 75 | rv_attach_trace_probe(name, task_newtask, handle_task= _newtask); > > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > include/linux/tracepoint.h:241:38: note: expected 'void (*)(void *, s= truct task_struct *, u64)' {aka 'void (*)(void *, struct task_struct *, lon= g long unsigned int)'} but argument is of type 'void (*)(void *, struct tas= k_struct *, long unsigned int)' > > > 241 | register_trace_##name(void (*probe)(data_proto), void= *data) \ > > > | ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > include/linux/tracepoint.h:270:9: note: in expansion of macro '__DECL= ARE_TRACE_COMMON' > > > 270 | __DECLARE_TRACE_COMMON(name, PARAMS(proto), PARAMS(ar= gs), PARAMS(data_proto)) \ > > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > include/linux/tracepoint.h:481:9: note: in expansion of macro '__DECL= ARE_TRACE' > > > 481 | __DECLARE_TRACE(name, PARAMS(proto), PARAMS(args), = \ > > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > include/linux/tracepoint.h:619:9: note: in expansion of macro 'DECLAR= E_TRACE_EVENT' > > > 619 | DECLARE_TRACE_EVENT(name, PARAMS(proto), PARAMS(args)) > > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > include/trace/events/task.h:9:1: note: in expansion of macro 'TRACE_E= VENT' > > > 9 | TRACE_EVENT(task_newtask, > > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~ > > > include/rv/ltl_monitor.h: In function 'ltl_monitor_destroy': > > > include/rv/ltl_monitor.h:92:51: error: passing argument 1 of 'unregis= ter_trace_task_newtask' from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-poin= ter-types] > > > 92 | rv_detach_trace_probe(name, task_newtask, handle_task= _newtask); > > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~= ~~~~~~~~ > > > | | > > > | void (*)(vo= id *, struct task_struct *, long unsigned int) > > > include/rv/instrumentation.h:28:39: note: in definition of macro 'rv_= detach_trace_probe' > > > 28 | unregister_trace_##tp(rv_handler, NULL); = \ > > > | ^~~~~~~~~~ > > > include/linux/tracepoint.h:254:40: note: expected 'void (*)(void *, s= truct task_struct *, u64)' {aka 'void (*)(void *, struct task_struct *, lon= g long unsigned int)'} but argument is of type 'void (*)(void *, struct tas= k_struct *, long unsigned int)' > > > 254 | unregister_trace_##name(void (*probe)(data_proto), vo= id *data) \ > > > | ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > include/linux/tracepoint.h:270:9: note: in expansion of macro '__DECL= ARE_TRACE_COMMON' > > > 270 | __DECLARE_TRACE_COMMON(name, PARAMS(proto), PARAMS(ar= gs), PARAMS(data_proto)) \ > > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > include/linux/tracepoint.h:481:9: note: in expansion of macro '__DECL= ARE_TRACE' > > > 481 | __DECLARE_TRACE(name, PARAMS(proto), PARAMS(args), = \ > > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > include/linux/tracepoint.h:619:9: note: in expansion of macro 'DECLAR= E_TRACE_EVENT' > > > 619 | DECLARE_TRACE_EVENT(name, PARAMS(proto), PARAMS(args)) > > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > include/trace/events/task.h:9:1: note: in expansion of macro 'TRACE_E= VENT' > > > 9 | TRACE_EVENT(task_newtask, > > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~ > > >=20 > > > Presumably caused by commit > > >=20 > > > edd3cb05c00a ("copy_process: pass clone_flags as u64 across calltre= e") > > >=20 > > > I have used the vfs-brauner tree from next-20250829 for today. =20 > >=20 > > I am still seeing this failure. >=20 > From today, I have instead just reverted these three commits: >=20 > c6ac444ff20c ("nios2: implement architecture-specific portion of sys_cl= one3") > bbc46b23af5b ("arch: copy_thread: pass clone_flags as u64") > edd3cb05c00a ("copy_process: pass clone_flags as u64 across calltree") I can't help but wondering what Linus would have to react when these commits made their way to PR to him as-is without any fix... --=20 An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara --MRaT2zXPHw09yZSn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYKAB0WIQSSYQ6Cy7oyFNCHrUH2uYlJVVFOowUCaMK84QAKCRD2uYlJVVFO o/ShAP9xqpaG8v636KcQcr6Ddn21rTqMA0S28OzFjdBF50TJKAD/bxGG3+yRlsvS YGjXA2ocI3KkLvKNnwD0uLZNJP9nwwA= =1N7L -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --MRaT2zXPHw09yZSn--