From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
To: Alexander Wilhelm <alexander.wilhelm@westermo.com>
Cc: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@gmx.de>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: tpm: SLM9670 does not work on T1023
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2025 20:06:11 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aMb2A5KzQJNx3daG@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aMLUIVjHZ6CFvd33@fue-alewi-winx>
On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 03:52:33PM +0200, Alexander Wilhelm wrote:
> Hello devs,
>
> I'm trying to bring up the SLM9670 TPM 2.0 device connected via SPI on a QorIQ
> T1023-based board. Pin control is fully configured through the RCW, so I haven't
> added any additional properties in the device tree. The SPI controller accesses
> the TPM using `#CS0`.
>
> However, the driver reads an incorrect vendor ID (0x1000000) and hangs during
> the startup sequence. A logic analyzer shows that the chip select line goes high
> immediately after transmitting 4 bytes, which, according to various forum
> discussions, does not comply with the TPM specification. Unfortunately, I
> haven't found a definitive solution to this issue.
So, at least the vendor ID is bogus meaning that TPM driver is doing
right thing.
>
> Could this be a bug in the `spi-fsl-espi` driver, or is it possibly a hardware
> limitation of the T1023? I've come across some suggestions that involve using a
> GPIO as an alternative chip select instead of the one provided by the SPI
> controller. Can anyone confirm whether this workaround is viable? I’d prefer to
> avoid a PCB redesign unless it's absolutely necessary.
My first guess would be that the firmware inside TPM actually does throw
a broken vendor ID but it is exactly a guess :-)
I'll follow this, and please cc me also to future threads but right now
I'm clueless.
>
>
> Best regards
> Alexander Wilhelm
BR, Jarkko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-14 17:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-11 13:52 tpm: SLM9670 does not work on T1023 Alexander Wilhelm
2025-09-11 14:26 ` Mark Brown
2025-09-11 14:51 ` Alexander Wilhelm
2025-09-11 15:04 ` Mark Brown
2025-09-14 17:06 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2025-09-14 17:08 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2025-09-15 5:49 ` Alexander Wilhelm
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aMb2A5KzQJNx3daG@kernel.org \
--to=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.wilhelm@westermo.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterhuewe@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox