public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
To: Alexander Wilhelm <alexander.wilhelm@westermo.com>
Cc: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@gmx.de>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: tpm: SLM9670 does not work on T1023
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2025 20:06:11 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aMb2A5KzQJNx3daG@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aMLUIVjHZ6CFvd33@fue-alewi-winx>

On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 03:52:33PM +0200, Alexander Wilhelm wrote:
> Hello devs,
> 
> I'm trying to bring up the SLM9670 TPM 2.0 device connected via SPI on a QorIQ
> T1023-based board. Pin control is fully configured through the RCW, so I haven't
> added any additional properties in the device tree. The SPI controller accesses
> the TPM using `#CS0`.
> 
> However, the driver reads an incorrect vendor ID (0x1000000) and hangs during
> the startup sequence. A logic analyzer shows that the chip select line goes high
> immediately after transmitting 4 bytes, which, according to various forum
> discussions, does not comply with the TPM specification. Unfortunately, I
> haven't found a definitive solution to this issue.

So, at least the vendor ID is bogus meaning that TPM driver is doing
right thing.

> 
> Could this be a bug in the `spi-fsl-espi` driver, or is it possibly a hardware
> limitation of the T1023? I've come across some suggestions that involve using a
> GPIO as an alternative chip select instead of the one provided by the SPI
> controller. Can anyone confirm whether this workaround is viable? I’d prefer to
> avoid a PCB redesign unless it's absolutely necessary.

My first guess would be that the firmware inside TPM actually does throw
a broken vendor ID but it is exactly a guess :-)

I'll follow this, and please cc me also to future threads but right now
I'm clueless.

> 
> 
> Best regards
> Alexander Wilhelm


BR, Jarkko

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-09-14 17:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-11 13:52 tpm: SLM9670 does not work on T1023 Alexander Wilhelm
2025-09-11 14:26 ` Mark Brown
2025-09-11 14:51   ` Alexander Wilhelm
2025-09-11 15:04     ` Mark Brown
2025-09-14 17:06 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2025-09-14 17:08   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2025-09-15  5:49   ` Alexander Wilhelm

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aMb2A5KzQJNx3daG@kernel.org \
    --to=jarkko@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexander.wilhelm@westermo.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterhuewe@gmx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox