From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>
Cc: will@kernel.org, broonie@kernel.org, maz@kernel.org,
oliver.upton@linux.dev, joey.gouly@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com,
ardb@kernel.org, scott@os.amperecomputing.com,
suzuki.poulose@arm.com, yuzenghui@huawei.com,
mark.rutland@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v7 4/6] arm64: futex: refactor futex atomic operation
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2025 20:40:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aMhrscd1gz_syMtL@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aMfrR0vserl/hfZ3@e129823.arm.com>
On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 11:32:39AM +0100, Yeoreum Yun wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 16, 2025 at 04:19:27PM +0100, Yeoreum Yun wrote:
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/futex.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/futex.h
> > > index bc06691d2062..ab7003cb4724 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/futex.h
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/futex.h
> > > @@ -7,17 +7,21 @@
> > >
> > > #include <linux/futex.h>
> > > #include <linux/uaccess.h>
> > > +#include <linux/stringify.h>
> > >
> > > #include <asm/errno.h>
> > >
> > > -#define FUTEX_MAX_LOOPS 128 /* What's the largest number you can think of? */
> > > +#define LLSC_MAX_LOOPS 128 /* What's the largest number you can think of? */
> >
> > I just noticed - you might as well leave the name as is here, especially
> > if in patch 6 you align down address and use CAS on a 64-bit value as
> > per Will's comment (and it's no longer LLSC). I think renaming this is
> > unnecessary.
>
> Okay. I'll restore to use origin name.
> But I think LSUI wouldn't be used with CAS according to patch 6's
> comments from you and additionally i think
> chaning the CAS would make a failure because of
> change of unrelated field. i.e)
>
> struct user_structure{
> uint32 futex;
> uint32 some_value;
> };
>
> In this case, the change of some_value from user side could make a
> failure of futex atomic operation.
Yes but the loop would read 'some_value' again, fold in 'futex' and
retry. It would eventually succeed or fail after 128 iterations if the
user keeps changing that location. Note that's also the case with LL/SC,
the exclusive monitor would be cleared by some store in the same cache
line (well, depending on the hardware implementation) and the STXR fail.
From this perspective, CAS has better chance of succeeding.
> So I think it would be better to keep the current LLSC implementation
> in LSUI.
I think the code would look simpler with LL/SC but you can give it a try
and post the code sample here (not in a new series).
BTW, is there a test suite for all the futex operations? The cover
letter did not mention any.
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-15 19:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-16 15:19 [PATCH RESEND v7 0/6] support FEAT_LSUI and apply it on futex atomic ops Yeoreum Yun
2025-08-16 15:19 ` [PATCH RESEND v7 1/6] arm64: cpufeature: add FEAT_LSUI Yeoreum Yun
2025-09-12 16:12 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-08-16 15:19 ` [PATCH RESEND v7 2/6] KVM: arm64: expose FEAT_LSUI to guest Yeoreum Yun
2025-09-12 16:25 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-08-16 15:19 ` [PATCH RESEND v7 3/6] arm64: Kconfig: add LSUI Kconfig Yeoreum Yun
2025-09-12 16:24 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-09-15 10:42 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-09-15 11:32 ` Will Deacon
2025-09-15 11:41 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-08-16 15:19 ` [PATCH RESEND v7 4/6] arm64: futex: refactor futex atomic operation Yeoreum Yun
2025-09-11 15:38 ` Will Deacon
2025-09-11 16:04 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-09-12 16:44 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-09-12 17:01 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-09-15 10:39 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-09-12 16:53 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-09-15 10:32 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-09-15 19:40 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2025-09-15 20:35 ` Will Deacon
2025-09-16 7:02 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-09-16 9:15 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-09-16 9:24 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-09-16 10:02 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-09-16 10:16 ` Will Deacon
2025-09-16 12:50 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-09-17 9:32 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-09-16 12:47 ` Mark Rutland
2025-09-16 13:27 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-09-16 13:45 ` Mark Rutland
2025-09-16 13:58 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-09-16 14:07 ` Mark Rutland
2025-09-16 14:15 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-09-15 22:34 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-09-16 12:53 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-08-16 15:19 ` [PATCH v7 RESEND 5/6] arm64: futex: small optimisation for __llsc_futex_atomic_set() Yeoreum Yun
2025-09-11 15:28 ` Will Deacon
2025-09-11 16:19 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-09-12 16:36 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-09-15 10:41 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-08-16 15:19 ` [PATCH RESEND v7 6/6] arm64: futex: support futex with FEAT_LSUI Yeoreum Yun
2025-09-11 15:22 ` Will Deacon
2025-09-11 16:45 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-09-12 17:16 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-09-15 9:15 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-09-12 17:09 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-09-15 8:24 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-09-01 10:06 ` [PATCH RESEND v7 0/6] support FEAT_LSUI and apply it on futex atomic ops Yeoreum Yun
2025-09-11 15:09 ` Will Deacon
2025-09-11 16:22 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-09-15 20:37 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aMhrscd1gz_syMtL@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=scott@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yeoreum.yun@arm.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox