From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>
Cc: brauner@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, josef@toxicpanda.com,
oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
ltp@lists.linux.it, oliver.sang@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] f2fs: don't call iput() from f2fs_drop_inode()
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2025 15:39:31 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aN1LM3C3Dc1TrQTq@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250930232957.14361-1-mjguzik@gmail.com>
On 10/01, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> iput() calls the problematic routine, which does a ->i_count inc/dec
> cycle. Undoing it with iput() recurses into the problem.
>
> Note f2fs should not be playing games with the refcount to begin with,
> but that will be handled later. Right now solve the immediate
> regression.
>
> Fixes: bc986b1d756482a ("fs: stop accessing ->i_count directly in f2fs and gfs2")
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202509301450.138b448f-lkp@intel.com
> Signed-off-by: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/super.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> index 2619cbbd7d2d..26ec31eb8c80 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> @@ -1769,7 +1769,7 @@ static int f2fs_drop_inode(struct inode *inode)
> sb_end_intwrite(inode->i_sb);
>
> spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
> - iput(inode);
> + atomic_dec(&inode->i_count);
It seems this was applied by Josef [1], added in 6.18-rc1. Let me apply this fix
after my f2fs pull request, since I don't have this issue in my -next tree yet.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/b8e6eb8a3e690ce082828d3580415bf70dfa93aa.1755806649.git.josef@toxicpanda.com/
> }
> trace_f2fs_drop_inode(inode, 0);
> return 0;
> --
> 2.43.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-01 15:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-30 6:41 [linus:master] [fs] bc986b1d75: Kernel_panic-not_syncing:softlockup:hung_tasks kernel test robot
2025-09-30 23:29 ` [PATCH] f2fs: don't call iput() from f2fs_drop_inode() Mateusz Guzik
2025-10-01 15:39 ` Jaegeuk Kim [this message]
2025-10-06 18:00 ` [f2fs-dev] " patchwork-bot+f2fs
2025-10-09 3:34 ` Chao Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aN1LM3C3Dc1TrQTq@google.com \
--to=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
--cc=mjguzik@gmail.com \
--cc=oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox