public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
To: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
Cc: <jgg@nvidia.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<robin.murphy@arm.com>, <will@kernel.org>, <joro@8bytes.org>,
	<kevin.tian@intel.com>, <jsnitsel@redhat.com>,
	<vasant.hegde@amd.com>, <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
	<santosh.shukla@amd.com>, <sairaj.arunkodilkar@amd.com>,
	<jon.grimm@amd.com>, <prashanthpra@google.com>, <wvw@google.com>,
	<wnliu@google.com>, <gptran@google.com>, <kpsingh@google.com>,
	<joao.m.martins@oracle.com>, <alejandro.j.jimenez@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/12] iommu/amd: Add support for nested domain attach/detach
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2025 12:04:53 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aN7M1QfaXG3YA7Xz@Asurada-Nvidia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251001060954.5030-12-suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>

On Wed, Oct 01, 2025 at 06:09:53AM +0000, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
>  /* sets a specific bit in the device table entry. */
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/amd/nested.c b/drivers/iommu/amd/nested.c
> index 11a0237174bb..5a0c369ba283 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/amd/nested.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/amd/nested.c
> @@ -11,9 +11,7 @@
>  #include "amd_iommu.h"
>  #include "amd_iommu_types.h"
>  
> -static const struct iommu_domain_ops nested_domain_ops = {
> -	.free = amd_iommu_domain_free,
> -};

Oh no, amd_iommu_domain_free() with to_pdomain() won't work. So
you should move the nested_domain_free() to the previous patch,
pairing with amd_iommu_alloc_domain_nested().

> +static void set_dte_nested(struct amd_iommu *iommu,
> +			   struct dev_table_entry *gdte,
> +			   struct nested_domain *ndom,
> +			   struct iommu_dev_data *dev_data)
> +{
> +	struct dev_table_entry *initial_dte;
> +	struct dev_table_entry new = {0};
> +	struct protection_domain *pdom = dev_data->parent;
> +
> +	if (WARN_ON(!ndom || !pdom || (pdom->iop.mode == PAGE_MODE_NONE)))
> +		return;
> +
> +	amd_iommu_make_clear_dte(dev_data, &new);
> +
> +	new.data[0] |= iommu_virt_to_phys(pdom->iop.root);
> +	new.data[0] |= FIELD_PREP(DTE_MODE_MASK, pdom->iop.mode);
> +	new.data[0] |= DTE_FLAG_IR | DTE_FLAG_IW | DTE_FLAG_TV;
> +	new.data[0] |= (DTE_FLAG_PPR & gdte->data[0]);

	new.data[0] |= DTE_FLAG_PPR & gdte->data[0];

> +	/* Guest translation stuff */
> +	new.data[0] |= (gdte->data[0] & (DTE_GLX | DTE_FLAG_GV | DTE_FLAG_GIOV));

	new.data[0] |= gdte->data[0] & (DTE_GLX | DTE_FLAG_GV | DTE_FLAG_GIOV);
> +
> +	/* GCR3 table */
> +	new.data[0] |= (gdte->data[0] & DTE_GCR3_14_12);
> +	new.data[1] |= (gdte->data[1] & (DTE_GCR3_30_15 | DTE_GCR3_51_31));
> +
> +	/* Guest paging mode */
> +	new.data[2] |= (gdte->data[2] & DTE_GPT_LEVEL_MASK);

All these outer parentheses are redundant.

> +static int nested_attach_device(struct iommu_domain *dom, struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct iommu_dev_data *dev_data = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
> +	struct amd_iommu *iommu = get_amd_iommu_from_dev_data(dev_data);
> +	struct nested_domain *ndom = to_ndomain(dom);
> +	struct dev_table_entry *gdte = &ndom->guest_dte;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	if (dev_data->ndom == ndom)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	if (!dev_is_pci(dev))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	/* Currently only support GCR3TRPMode with nested translation */
> +	if (!check_feature2(FEATURE_GCR3TRPMODE))
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;

The amd_iommu_alloc_domain_nested() should probably validate this
feature, so !FEATURE_GCR3TRPMODE wouldn't allocate a nested domain
at the first place, and then no need to revalidate it in attach().

> +
> +	/* We need to check host capability before setting the mode */
> +	if ((FIELD_GET(DTE_GPT_LEVEL_MASK, gdte->data[2]) == GUEST_PGTABLE_5_LEVEL) &&
> +	    (amd_iommu_gpt_level < PAGE_MODE_5_LEVEL))
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;

Ditto.

The attach callback function should only check things related to
the compatibility between a device and a domain, while this is a
domain specific validation. Better do it in alloc() IMHO.

> +	WARN_ON(dev_data->ndom);

	return -EBUSY;
?

With these fixed,

Reviewed-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-02 19:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-01  6:09 [PATCH v2 00/12] iommu/amd: Introduce Nested Translation support Suravee Suthikulpanit
2025-10-01  6:09 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] iommu/amd: Rename DEV_DOMID_MASK to DTE_DOMID_MASK Suravee Suthikulpanit
2025-10-02 17:12   ` Nicolin Chen
2025-10-06 14:36   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-01  6:09 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] iommu/amd: Make amd_iommu_pdom_id_alloc() non-static Suravee Suthikulpanit
2025-10-02 17:12   ` Nicolin Chen
2025-10-01  6:09 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] iommu/amd: Make amd_iommu_pdom_id_free() non-static Suravee Suthikulpanit
2025-10-02 17:13   ` Nicolin Chen
2025-10-06 14:37   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-01  6:09 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] iommu/amd: Make amd_iommu_device_flush_dte() non-static Suravee Suthikulpanit
2025-10-02 17:14   ` Nicolin Chen
2025-10-06 14:37   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-01  6:09 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] iommu/amd: Make amd_iommu_update_dte256() non-static Suravee Suthikulpanit
2025-10-02 17:15   ` Nicolin Chen
2025-10-01  6:09 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] iommu/amd: Make amd_iommu_make_clear_dte() non-static inline Suravee Suthikulpanit
2025-10-02 17:17   ` Nicolin Chen
2025-10-01  6:09 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] iommu/amd: Make amd_iommu_completion_wait() non-static Suravee Suthikulpanit
2025-10-02 17:24   ` Nicolin Chen
2025-10-01  6:09 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] iommufd: Introduce data struct for AMD nested domain allocation Suravee Suthikulpanit
2025-10-02 17:31   ` Nicolin Chen
2025-10-01  6:09 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] iommu/amd: Add support for nest parent " Suravee Suthikulpanit
2025-10-02 18:00   ` Nicolin Chen
2025-10-06 14:43     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-08 14:16     ` Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2025-10-01  6:09 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] iommu/amd: Add support for nested " Suravee Suthikulpanit
2025-10-02 18:29   ` Nicolin Chen
2025-10-06 14:49   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-07 20:36     ` Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2025-10-07 23:39       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-09  6:22         ` Sairaj Kodilkar
2025-10-09  9:16           ` Sairaj Kodilkar
2025-10-09 14:34           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-01  6:09 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] iommu/amd: Add support for nested domain attach/detach Suravee Suthikulpanit
2025-10-02 19:04   ` Nicolin Chen [this message]
2025-10-06 14:59   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-07 19:22     ` Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2025-10-07 23:43       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-09  7:18         ` Sairaj Kodilkar
2025-10-09 14:35           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-01  6:09 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] iommu/amd: Introduce IOMMUFD vIOMMU support for AMD Suravee Suthikulpanit
2025-10-02 20:05   ` Nicolin Chen
2025-10-06 15:01     ` Jason Gunthorpe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aN7M1QfaXG3YA7Xz@Asurada-Nvidia \
    --to=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=alejandro.j.jimenez@oracle.com \
    --cc=gptran@google.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
    --cc=jon.grimm@amd.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=jsnitsel@redhat.com \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=prashanthpra@google.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=sairaj.arunkodilkar@amd.com \
    --cc=santosh.shukla@amd.com \
    --cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --cc=vasant.hegde@amd.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=wnliu@google.com \
    --cc=wvw@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox