From: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>,
Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sched-ext@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] sched_ext: Fix stray scx_root usage in task_can_run_on_remote_rq()
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2025 09:22:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aNJKsO4vv_FnBSOe@gpd4> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250922013246.275031-3-tj@kernel.org>
On Sun, Sep 21, 2025 at 03:32:42PM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> task_can_run_on_remote_rq() takes @sch but it is using scx_root when
> incrementing SCX_EV_DISPATCH_LOCAL_DSQ_OFFLINE, which is inconsistent and
> gets in the way of implementing multiple scheduler support. Use @sch
> instead. As currently scx_root is the only possible scheduler instance, this
> doesn't cause any behavior changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Good catch.
Acked-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/ext.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext.c
> index df433f6fab4b..5801ac676d59 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/ext.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/ext.c
> @@ -1622,8 +1622,7 @@ static bool task_can_run_on_remote_rq(struct scx_sched *sch,
>
> if (!scx_rq_online(rq)) {
> if (enforce)
> - __scx_add_event(scx_root,
> - SCX_EV_DISPATCH_LOCAL_DSQ_OFFLINE, 1);
> + __scx_add_event(sch, SCX_EV_DISPATCH_LOCAL_DSQ_OFFLINE, 1);
> return false;
> }
>
> --
> 2.51.0
>
-Andrea
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-23 7:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-22 1:32 [PATCH 1/7] sched_ext: Use rhashtable_lookup() instead of rhashtable_lookup_fast() Tejun Heo
2025-09-22 1:32 ` [PATCH 2/7] sched_ext: Improve SCX_KF_DISPATCH comment Tejun Heo
2025-09-23 7:20 ` Andrea Righi
2025-09-22 1:32 ` [PATCH 3/7] sched_ext: Fix stray scx_root usage in task_can_run_on_remote_rq() Tejun Heo
2025-09-23 7:22 ` Andrea Righi [this message]
2025-09-22 1:32 ` [PATCH 4/7] sched_ext: Use bitfields for boolean warning flags Tejun Heo
2025-09-23 7:45 ` Andrea Righi
2025-09-23 16:00 ` Tejun Heo
2025-09-23 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 " Tejun Heo
2025-09-23 18:45 ` Andrea Righi
2025-09-22 1:32 ` [PATCH 5/7] sched_ext: Add SCX_EFLAG_INITIALIZED to indicate successful ops.init() Tejun Heo
2025-09-23 8:08 ` Andrea Righi
2025-09-22 1:32 ` [PATCH 6/7] sched_ext: Make qmap dump operation non-destructive Tejun Heo
2025-09-23 8:09 ` Andrea Righi
2025-09-22 1:32 ` [PATCH 7/7] tools/sched_ext: scx_qmap: Make debug output quieter by default Tejun Heo
2025-09-23 8:11 ` Andrea Righi
2025-09-23 7:18 ` [PATCH 1/7] sched_ext: Use rhashtable_lookup() instead of rhashtable_lookup_fast() Andrea Righi
2025-09-23 15:59 ` Tejun Heo
2025-09-23 18:47 ` Andrea Righi
2025-09-23 19:13 ` Tejun Heo
2025-09-24 6:14 ` Andrea Righi
2025-09-24 6:38 ` Tejun Heo
2025-09-24 8:26 ` Andrea Righi
2025-09-24 18:00 ` Tejun Heo
2025-10-22 21:37 ` Andrea Righi
2025-10-22 21:56 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aNJKsO4vv_FnBSOe@gpd4 \
--to=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox