From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B83C8C11 for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2025 15:33:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758728033; cv=none; b=EJVahsk1xwRsWTVTBOLeE69R+XKKzxniYb3m3r/DgKn5uJ8vheROdebXMar0q0+DjenyrQa3RIaEaRbO3U9PBa/u10+UYBS6ezeTWUSjMQ2AhbwFwizjNitkOIsSBVYtqaYIbLBKoEYJBwCrFxvt9cZWufM5jlncQ9OCNxta/+Q= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758728033; c=relaxed/simple; bh=wRch98PTr07OsPbOEWFR6ZR70W6lFXly25dnPdzBGHc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Dn8pbvA9z3iu6JC3/VeNR39PARtAoXeWjEgU23g2lALwO1wY/+VSNI3IjRvW1GQYcku8InbP/K1iK0kVOQ5hjehEPL8xYaGFpFmoB5vPibrpwvksML61FfAoDq8vuzkXXMm/G3oC7pCThYQnnie186dggxvscJdFGIzcM/2I9Ww= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=FrVbhAZj; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="FrVbhAZj" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1758728030; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ic7zvcyBVtaZcEmsf3hW05wAfmOMNZ5JL2VpkYQoXsc=; b=FrVbhAZjnj+3afecM9iyrE8dm4m7eM3bO9kNMWMYSajELoQ3LWp+5t/KXwf0DRetEtgIYJ 9tvyr63oCjkhBxIpB7FEQtNngbjeciwlUJtVZXsW0/6ERUDfM5c3Mh7rIcDIR9VY98+h3q XauT2v1//eTopNsr1NuRTAn9tnroQxk= Received: from mail-qk1-f200.google.com (mail-qk1-f200.google.com [209.85.222.200]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-478-S01iI5OnPhaUToRvpcGc6w-1; Wed, 24 Sep 2025 11:33:48 -0400 X-MC-Unique: S01iI5OnPhaUToRvpcGc6w-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: S01iI5OnPhaUToRvpcGc6w_1758728028 Received: by mail-qk1-f200.google.com with SMTP id af79cd13be357-81ea2cb6f13so4961685a.0 for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2025 08:33:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1758728028; x=1759332828; h=user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ic7zvcyBVtaZcEmsf3hW05wAfmOMNZ5JL2VpkYQoXsc=; b=Dt6iyK/gDKGDmOxlwPpDRjY5JXC/mUvkQm4/UZbchQbSRp8ZkVskYmork/aAbaAhMG U9p6Tly0mjChB0v0aUdaSpxIGmEZebnaP8YiixBuB+lu7YRTXfKhxmdglD0HBoDdatf/ 6tjzHySU571KZ5X0Og4EV9EAa0Q/XmQKjcUreKbagEYIjcVQCk57M90TKMkpMoO/sv6T TOuOUvflNtzD3sbqNrCABGYzN4+ilWab1bQD4a6W6MQYD0xnjRhhWuriuRJVvfFFXNtt RcolfrwxAY1fsRg+zPlvuC1R/oaXzyKCVea7EV3qP9YZWHMN1W7M76do0ciVVoDLxYVS lCEw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWmFrP50hTqUFy+2m5L1Px2vjdmRhYfoSbvbq4auJ8Sq0JHIymA5MOAS0z5/cT0XR6EJ2J/8QcPn77hQL0=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzHkMDFOSgHRtWaLVano8iDGO458rt9PijCfkjSnCF4KjFKyOWV MUV5lO3VtrCGlUYylldh+aifXIKeqivgQyNnu0M6VEAgbTJpFDg/2Qa0mOOAeAatojHrSuMZ3qF ExwNii4wbXGL3PZx3tdBhdGaCihk8COgqnPSim0zmtKv9QnEPhPFFgdqAzZrJ/8mUwA== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctf956zkNAHjphFJIjOvAco4pms+fkEIMjwz8zG936rT1fOhkDpORYesz57mfb u6IKiKcbjuM9F5gakbA4gEcWskYQcb1X4Kob/Kajl63+QPqQL2KGxU0fF9MTwXGCo04QpipcELq cGKpZ7udntPx8vIlChYHYW4QFNwENZ/LLwaJvYoNp3njTgOYyy9HlzzrH87J/6dtc3X+R4Ksfvx NTGY4UIyTk51aJaO8bSyVS3VIYTbPmBrUAu5368VLcvW9AGrqOUtHy6++ytPSDNZvUaETR5zypJ YNWUEu/+2f7Hbm/jiq9Uqh9P/c9TnPqqE5YGNDfHdH9zYH/YzrZq/Gbgj+RHxP5A3szr4g== X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:1a89:b0:828:1529:d028 with SMTP id af79cd13be357-85ae7cd4ac1mr7326885a.61.1758728028087; Wed, 24 Sep 2025 08:33:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE7m0/cbnvCoTKElfyKlC9Akk8QQ848roxwkCAlIQudXokrBobnZdaunrFKeYAlTGXQPxdHhg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:1a89:b0:828:1529:d028 with SMTP id af79cd13be357-85ae7cd4ac1mr7322385a.61.1758728027583; Wed, 24 Sep 2025 08:33:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from redhat.com ([2600:382:8504:5608:ca95:838:d4f0:316f]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id af79cd13be357-8363198b0fbsm1167921585a.50.2025.09.24.08.33.45 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 24 Sep 2025 08:33:46 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2025 11:33:44 -0400 From: Brian Masney To: Peng Fan Cc: Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Sudeep Holla , Cristian Marussi , Marco Felsch , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Dan Carpenter , Geert Uytterhoeven , "linux-clk@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] clk: Support spread spectrum and use it in clk-scmi Message-ID: References: <20250915-clk-ssc-version1-v4-0-5a2cee2f0351@nxp.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/2.2.14 (2025-02-20) On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 02:44:21PM +0000, Peng Fan wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > > Subject: [PATCH v4 0/5] clk: Support spread spectrum and use it in clk- > > scmi > > Since clk-scmi.c for spread spectrum support needs some big changes, > we may need to change scmi framework to make OEM extension > in an elegant way. This will needs some time. > > To patch 1-4, do you think is it ok to be in linux tree without patch 5? > If yes, I will post V5 soon with your comments in patch 2 addressed. > Otherwise I have to carry patch 1-4 in future clk-scmi patches. This adds a new API, and there wouldn't be any users of it at this point. Personally, I think it should probably wait and be merged as one series. Unless there's another vendor that's ready to use this. Brian