From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.zeus03.de (zeus03.de [194.117.254.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D12F719D087 for ; Sat, 27 Sep 2025 22:28:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1759012103; cv=none; b=f9YxRpBRIrfRGpmVtADYc1eQBuw6Kb6a4b7J7hOW4c56JojSjzeU83k9GCkQrgUreLYNPgluzkqWHjPFnWAZQ8loeY7QZNl1EvfUqxyK6RZimMU1S3jP0HIN5L5PyxhLAvYpm2mNk+MnbHQM/MeVQVWl39dxh28nHd5jw7x9qr8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1759012103; c=relaxed/simple; bh=5OLTzPxIdYsUVeiOoZUF189rauKtei7+nmPm7dDIojY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Bx7aAd36bZcPPhcE2Eatm6WSjToE5gWjzNDQLAmwxGF09w5uL/LcHyZtNsUHI4xGSw5R+PdXy2/5bVZsJqBZxyKyp9ccQskwKhnXmtD+TpZgkqCGRdSsKIksiyn//QsKa29JMnWU7I8+K0eSybPAO0Oi5a+qCth6BeMDbU1wNmA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b=jIpGYNmE; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b="jIpGYNmE" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= sang-engineering.com; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=k1; bh=briJ +qeic7cY6iPJ4hQ23iKjWHUKZaedrPOQzDcbuvM=; b=jIpGYNmEmhKy6dAwDw2x lZhl4atgdndfmdjjy8/8VtkJ3TrSnWiZmGFxnb9dN4yfV7tn0puEq8KJYld+NrAD 5vlL8ymHOmS69l7lVXtKNNC//K9onlqgdBMsq0O4oP6kkySY2w5PzfzU94JzqVtf P8VDxiCVD27mbtaJ7MdaxkXacrVDHThoxLfsNiYlYJhQBIksTJ2FN/8lF1zPHb4Q MQz2iSS6Ym7nckR2jeJUd4dohOG7XR5+//uiSa/q44Uejev9v+HEs7Mciocsav41 Ptqv1MoHv6I4dc/FP1ZpRxkCvJH1Z+l4g7db3UTFut6Vuj2RxwfXUpX2xfAZqoip /Q== Received: (qmail 2702438 invoked from network); 28 Sep 2025 00:28:19 +0200 Received: by mail.zeus03.de with UTF8SMTPSA (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted, authenticated); 28 Sep 2025 00:28:19 +0200 X-UD-Smtp-Session: l3s3148p1@9ZdY688/Bowujnsw Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2025 00:28:19 +0200 From: Wolfram Sang To: Sven Eckelmann Cc: Chris Packham , Andi Shyti , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jonas Jelonek , Harshal Gohel , Simon Wunderlich , stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH i2c-host-fixes i2c-host v7 1/2] i2c: rtl9300: Drop unsupported I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_BLOCK_DATA Message-ID: References: <20250927-i2c-rtl9300-multi-byte-v7-0-c0fd0e78b818@narfation.org> <20250927-i2c-rtl9300-multi-byte-v7-1-c0fd0e78b818@narfation.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250927-i2c-rtl9300-multi-byte-v7-1-c0fd0e78b818@narfation.org> On Sat, Sep 27, 2025 at 11:52:16AM +0200, Sven Eckelmann wrote: > While applying the patch for commit ede965fd555a ("i2c: rtl9300: remove > broken SMBus Quick operation support"), a conflict was incorrectly solved > by adding the I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_I2C_BLOCK feature flag. But the code to handle > I2C_SMBUS_I2C_BLOCK_DATA requests will be added by a separate commit. > > Fixes: ede965fd555a ("i2c: rtl9300: remove broken SMBus Quick operation support") > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v6.13+ > Signed-off-by: Sven Eckelmann Applied to for-current with $subject fixed to match the correct FUNC flag, thanks!