From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.ilvokhin.com (mail.ilvokhin.com [178.62.254.231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CF4E31A7F5 for ; Wed, 15 Oct 2025 09:36:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=178.62.254.231 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1760520983; cv=none; b=mp5Z5R+CsVYseMt6XrISl7bIH8kcS1Ag7xMsSutREJLGYIOodwycup5ML5JCD1KgNuOjUU/khRIViJJc+Db5SekifpmdrmudhaW1GaGReoted6Qd8+vH0ZSQ1U5PQgprBZrKiQlIVOOUTbWKpZyx12M3t6L6shuT1OilTqZBujU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1760520983; c=relaxed/simple; bh=444rF87rbwnL1HPCf4I+2dUp9e+GDDNxSUd1IzYBqKA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=YjEpYwAnwGegEpyYAv71oxCuRNUBziwec3KNBcbbZQuH9gLfBUCxokHpI3gucytwT2KnLYVqgOcnvkTwKj37Dk3gQw7Ph3z5NbofL2Kv3Z5tmw38O/zXte5BbxI5U5rHiHITAAEuudrwzmGQ87P6VzNeZoEMemiY0Ucvk5r2q7w= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=ilvokhin.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ilvokhin.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ilvokhin.com header.i=@ilvokhin.com header.b=ohd2jmWa; arc=none smtp.client-ip=178.62.254.231 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=ilvokhin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ilvokhin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ilvokhin.com header.i=@ilvokhin.com header.b="ohd2jmWa" Received: from shell.ilvokhin.com (shell.ilvokhin.com [138.68.190.75]) (Authenticated sender: d@ilvokhin.com) by mail.ilvokhin.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6DCB393278; Wed, 15 Oct 2025 09:36:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ilvokhin.com; s=mail; t=1760520973; bh=444rF87rbwnL1HPCf4I+2dUp9e+GDDNxSUd1IzYBqKA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=ohd2jmWaAkpvBv9pZqM52/48kSusnuBNByZ8gZ0W8u6RbLJXO+uP9tJRc7aT8vU/Q ektic11TqmL8DSww6OD5HHXkeE+XCeSkVH41KTDC61cgSQ8yOEOU9QgLCuP2OpgmQO hDTzDBja3DueDoLqVdQEAhnTu4SHk8A9q8ZXuG4M= Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2025 09:36:09 +0000 From: Dmitry Ilvokhin To: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/irq: Optimize interrupts decimals printing Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Hello everyone, Just want to follow up on this patch. Does this change looks reasonable to you? I would appreciate any feedback, and thank you in advance for the time spent reviewing it. Best regards, Dmitry