From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-yw1-f175.google.com (mail-yw1-f175.google.com [209.85.128.175]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 646842E172B for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2025 16:06:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.175 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1759853176; cv=none; b=UJHN9S3WWAgYZkldH4duwjljACzMcSMlTqXxHr5Y15NvlQL1r79L0EjqFwas80/FFo6zo024Fs7VPjtNVRALvnzli3awwRfnNzsVfe0xawN0WzW0BEMuFEv43eDxQWBlqQwiO9VdE6U92R8P0yr2BeY9jXhZF5U7JI3V4D+vp80= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1759853176; c=relaxed/simple; bh=X65wHkpJhWZgne4Ag70cATb79P5sdfgFOkB+4Mn2Nac=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=nf4IbR8InJ/6NNBIX56QExoHoEheR1u1fnhHPCaxrerSNjjkWadfNseUQqg1F5cgv/VTDHZHTm4VUdPYV+cPspqU/n/sAsP9+SemQj2G2NLh7sW/VqkH5FlqOlSPWxx2aYPNlqoc7pistNo24o25/yC08qTrW+R7SDwQvyUOU8E= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=IcDmNlNO; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.175 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="IcDmNlNO" Received: by mail-yw1-f175.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-73f20120601so77724957b3.2 for ; Tue, 07 Oct 2025 09:06:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1759853174; x=1760457974; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=zxd7w+3c/2swwtIgYgecKNq0yqsZikLr6MYY6N0WKtE=; b=IcDmNlNOx475w5C0sVAVePxq0u6fsTmLL3QtWE3svilGouWVyUnqengbFDXxntl+3Y jKbxQF+dpQc/b0wqBsSGO1eAhpPbPY7Gi/3HfX1ABB4PUKzdtVKXg7t0MHBhVjG+TiKa dtDDSE21te6Z3AsjhU1uOtRufxvYvbBLCMEylUKM5jylHvW3fl8Ojezh08uutLJqIoE1 UPhOvQuEJT+IMw4TvU4OYp1CfWGFtsSr4F9i+1bC19KoW4TTz5qU24/CIHAdR2nFVnj9 NzTCLzMA8kYAuAAyBa4EFWh9iYa9Sso2FjEfTo7qFuSRmTUDyUp1ZdEUGENQGsmi8PK9 kJ1g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1759853174; x=1760457974; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=zxd7w+3c/2swwtIgYgecKNq0yqsZikLr6MYY6N0WKtE=; b=QacFGzWQDphjFjhexsKkl42xvhWES3TU5Sm01n6nGPFh2URJfpF9aRtV/3TNUrc4bi woon5cVvZh7WnY8GtzfEC4ArkrH+i6kPMjw0N9uMaAu6/U8tcE/1AzRfObc+B0qugRW2 gw2PUsWiFOy1Uz9dltJDdNmHogB527sjqHnjXo5U8x4AYEjpVW7z/0dNk/f3C85E1scy nzIFfJl0TRcDlh9CsaJL5NBZCoIeb5KLEOgQszMuYYty1QCvB1Q5bOr3AKGmEwJJyRSQ v7VDZaA2B4+ILMYfqSW5tV4zYrfUWc2nvNwiVkq7uQXTEDZzCbv1AKYMdZZ7MfevO9at sBdw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCW6D7cLbVBfrc2boAX14Aoel1jcioJ+snMng//WYQ/JKuYWLS+290VPLQIAt3hPjza1HdkV1HtnfsAE7WA=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwDzbE+vGrn2zevq143ZIQEKCkmCI/62mcaLi/9T0/VBzkANkrd YT/Ibd1E1oxOd7M5AwQWoXUeukVypOHCzoZEnPBP/Onm3db8EsebWarg X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncseVWvoqLFb5tPOjQXb72CmJRy7+3sQj7I564TuwxiO+ekuZagP0wH3hQ2EIt3 x+ZXHnu80JOGI8HjR8XhHqi8KdA2WvNZ6EzPznaIhncRGkfszPRjwPVoJSV4m9Fx7TCTGCuBrGI Ml5lSoyK5zHjQech5soJODupKkjE9i3f+Flc7S1kYasoLsLUjnNP5BbdReDS07RxNhLimi+LztJ BLwA7E8QsaEeqLF4EF/DF8NHzFhTqLPZLddhKYVE4lUMsGo/2kWHOTunrkpFJ9TRXsHQEcWxnqc ISOLEgNPryqbRk4xa2e2n/ZZynSvI/FslQHZtuskKX/T93ZPTuIjs5aYO3DnzpJuKl4TOcu9B1W erEuyA9iRtNWtR4SeUkW4Ff8T1QXgN4mSn4v6l2ulBqw6D9xIVm6r4+r2bqs8XB1VRNGXN7tPL6 yC6Xo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGOfFA9QkKleZeWTFtFw7q0cnvtzA4e283IrCuPbzkVclh+0FUFO6eeZ9qg2IcZjjtJmEaW9Q== X-Received: by 2002:a05:690c:4a05:b0:77f:a301:4634 with SMTP id 00721157ae682-780e17aa12dmr3158717b3.45.1759853173810; Tue, 07 Oct 2025 09:06:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (c-73-105-0-253.hsd1.fl.comcast.net. [73.105.0.253]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 00721157ae682-77f81c0c2cesm54284547b3.11.2025.10.07.09.06.12 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 07 Oct 2025 09:06:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2025 12:06:12 -0400 From: Yury Norov To: Alexandre Courbot Cc: Miguel Ojeda , Joel Fernandes , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, dakr@kernel.org, Alistair Popple , Miguel Ojeda , Alex Gaynor , Boqun Feng , Gary Guo , bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com, Benno Lossin , Andreas Hindborg , Alice Ryhl , Trevor Gross , David Airlie , Simona Vetter , Maarten Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard , Thomas Zimmermann , John Hubbard , Timur Tabi , joel@joelfernandes.org, Elle Rhumsaa , Daniel Almeida , Andrea Righi , nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] Introduce bitfield and move register macro to rust/kernel/ Message-ID: References: <20251003154748.1687160-1-joelagnelf@nvidia.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Tue, Oct 07, 2025 at 10:20:54PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote: > On Tue Oct 7, 2025 at 7:42 PM JST, Miguel Ojeda wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 7, 2025 at 12:36 PM Alexandre Courbot wrote: > >> > >> We can assume maintainership of this of course, but is there a problem > >> if this falls under the core Rust umbrella? As this is a pretty core > >> functionality. Miguel and other core folks, WDYT? > > > > I think what Yury may mean is that this should get an explicit > > `MAINTAINERS` subentry even if it falls under `rust/kernel/` -- I > > agree that is a good idea. Exactly. Otherwise we'll end up with a single maintainer for a huge codebase written by different people for different reasons. This is how lib/ is maintained now. Not very effective. > Ack - how do you expect things to work in terms of code flow? Do we need > to have a dedicated tree and send you pull requests? If so, should we > host it under the Rust-for-Linux Github org? (Not sure you've asked me but anyways) For maintenance hierarchy I'd suggest a structure where an author of the new subsystem obviously becomes a maintainer, then some acknowledged Rust person co-maintains it, and lately some non-rust person from a related kernel subsystem becomes a reviewer or co-maintainer. In 6.18 we did this for bitmaps, and the maintenance entry looks like: BITMAP API [RUST] M: Alice Ryhl M: Burak Emir R: Yury Norov S: Maintained F: rust/kernel/bitmap.rs Check 11eca92a2cae ("rust: add bitmap API"). Thanks, Yury