public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
To: Francesco Lavra <flavra@baylibre.com>
Cc: "Jonathan Cameron" <jic23@kernel.org>,
	"David Lechner" <dlechner@baylibre.com>,
	"Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
	"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: Decouple sensor ODR from FIFO batch data rate
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2025 00:30:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aOg3dg21aWNTF47x@lore-desk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251009173609.992452-3-flavra@baylibre.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 9234 bytes --]

> The rate at which accelerometer or gyroscope sensor samples are fed
> to the hardware FIFO (batch data rate, or BDR) does not have to
> coincide with the sensor sampling frequency (output data rate, or
> ODR); the only requirement is for the BDR to not be greater than
> the ODR. Having a BDR lower than the ODR is useful in cases where
> an application requires a high sampling rate for accurate detection
> of motion events (e.g. wakeup events), but wants to read sensor
> sample values from the device buffer at a lower data rate.

can you please provide more details here? Are you using the hw fifo to read
data? If we configure the hw fifo according to the BDR (even assuming the
watermark is set 1) the hw will generate interrupts according to the BDR
(bdr < odr).

> To support the above use case, add a sampling_frequency sysfs
> attribute to the buffer directory of st_lsm6dsx IIO devices, which
> controls the BDR for a given sensor independently from the "main"
> sampling_frequency attribute (which controls the ODR); introduce a
> new `bdr` field in struct st_lsm6dsx_sensor to keep track of the
> current BDR value, and use this field instead of the `odr` field in
> the code that deals with the FIFO data rate. In the sensor hub
> driver, make the bdr value always mirror the odr value, since there
> is no separate configuration setting to control the BDR for data
> produced by the sensor hub functionality.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Francesco Lavra <flavra@baylibre.com>
> ---
>  drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx.h       |  2 +
>  .../iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_buffer.c    | 64 ++++++++++++++++---
>  drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_core.c  |  9 ++-
>  drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_shub.c  |  4 +-
>  4 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx.h b/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx.h
> index bd366c6e282a..dc4aeea3a3b8 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx.h
> +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx.h
> @@ -366,6 +366,7 @@ enum st_lsm6dsx_fifo_mode {
>   * @hw: Pointer to instance of struct st_lsm6dsx_hw.
>   * @gain: Configured sensor sensitivity.
>   * @odr: Output data rate of the sensor [mHz].
> + * @bdr: Batch data rate [mHz]
>   * @samples_to_discard: Number of samples to discard for filters settling time.
>   * @watermark: Sensor watermark level.
>   * @decimator: Sensor decimation factor.
> @@ -380,6 +381,7 @@ struct st_lsm6dsx_sensor {
>  
>  	u32 gain;
>  	u32 odr;
> +	u32 bdr;
>  
>  	u16 samples_to_discard;
>  	u16 watermark;
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_buffer.c b/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_buffer.c
> index 8a9d2593576a..5912ea76d493 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_buffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_buffer.c
> @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@
>  #include <linux/iio/kfifo_buf.h>
>  #include <linux/iio/iio.h>
>  #include <linux/iio/buffer.h>
> +#include <linux/iio/sysfs.h>
>  #include <linux/regmap.h>
>  #include <linux/bitfield.h>
>  
> @@ -105,7 +106,7 @@ static int
>  st_lsm6dsx_get_decimator_val(struct st_lsm6dsx_sensor *sensor, u32 max_odr)
>  {
>  	const int max_size = ARRAY_SIZE(st_lsm6dsx_decimator_table);
> -	u32 decimator =  max_odr / sensor->odr;
> +	u32 decimator =  max_odr / sensor->bdr;
>  	int i;
>  
>  	if (decimator > 1)
> @@ -136,14 +137,14 @@ static void st_lsm6dsx_get_max_min_odr(struct st_lsm6dsx_hw *hw,
>  		if (!(hw->enable_mask & BIT(sensor->id)))
>  			continue;
>  
> -		*max_odr = max_t(u32, *max_odr, sensor->odr);
> -		*min_odr = min_t(u32, *min_odr, sensor->odr);
> +		*max_odr = max_t(u32, *max_odr, sensor->bdr);
> +		*min_odr = min_t(u32, *min_odr, sensor->bdr);
>  	}
>  }
>  
>  static u8 st_lsm6dsx_get_sip(struct st_lsm6dsx_sensor *sensor, u32 min_odr)
>  {
> -	u8 sip = sensor->odr / min_odr;
> +	u8 sip = sensor->bdr / min_odr;
>  
>  	return sip > 1 ? round_down(sip, 2) : sip;
>  }
> @@ -231,7 +232,7 @@ static int st_lsm6dsx_set_fifo_odr(struct st_lsm6dsx_sensor *sensor,
>  		if (enable) {
>  			int err;
>  
> -			err = st_lsm6dsx_check_odr(sensor, sensor->odr,
> +			err = st_lsm6dsx_check_odr(sensor, sensor->bdr,
>  						   &data);
>  			if (err < 0)
>  				return err;
> @@ -713,7 +714,7 @@ st_lsm6dsx_update_samples_to_discard(struct st_lsm6dsx_sensor *sensor)
>  
>  	data = &hw->settings->samples_to_discard[sensor->id];
>  	for (i = 0; i < ST_LSM6DSX_ODR_LIST_SIZE; i++) {
> -		if (data->val[i].milli_hz == sensor->odr) {
> +		if (data->val[i].milli_hz == sensor->bdr) {
>  			sensor->samples_to_discard = data->val[i].samples;
>  			return;
>  		}
> @@ -799,6 +800,52 @@ static const struct iio_buffer_setup_ops st_lsm6dsx_buffer_ops = {
>  	.postdisable = st_lsm6dsx_buffer_postdisable,
>  };
>  
> +static ssize_t st_lsm6dsx_bdr_show(struct device *dev,
> +				   struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> +{
> +	struct st_lsm6dsx_sensor *sensor = iio_priv(dev_to_iio_dev(dev));
> +	u32 bdr = sensor->bdr;
> +
> +	return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d.%03d\n", bdr / 1000, bdr % 1000);
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t st_lsm6dsx_bdr_store(struct device *dev,
> +				    struct device_attribute *attr,
> +				    const char *buf, size_t len)
> +{
> +	struct iio_dev *iio_dev = dev_to_iio_dev(dev);
> +	struct st_lsm6dsx_sensor *sensor = iio_priv(iio_dev);
> +	int integer, fract;
> +	int ret;
> +	u32 bdr;
> +	u8 data;
> +
> +	ret = iio_str_to_fixpoint(buf, 100, &integer, &fract);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
nit: new line here.

> +	bdr = integer * 1000 + fract;
> +	ret = st_lsm6dsx_check_odr(sensor, bdr, &data);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;

nit: new line here.

> +	bdr = ret;
> +	if (!iio_device_claim_direct(iio_dev))
> +		return -EBUSY;

I guess you can check it at the beginning of the routine.

> +	/* the batch data rate must not exceed the sensor output data rate */
> +	if (bdr <= sensor->odr)
> +		sensor->bdr = bdr;
> +	else
> +		ret = -EINVAL;

nit: new line here.

> +	iio_device_release_direct(iio_dev);

nit: new line here.

> +	return (ret < 0) ? ret : len;

nit: we do not need brackets here.

> +}
> +
> +static IIO_DEV_ATTR_SAMP_FREQ(0664, st_lsm6dsx_bdr_show, st_lsm6dsx_bdr_store);
> +
> +static const struct iio_dev_attr *st_lsm6dsx_buffer_attrs[] = {
> +	&iio_dev_attr_sampling_frequency,
> +	NULL
> +};
> +
>  int st_lsm6dsx_fifo_setup(struct st_lsm6dsx_hw *hw)
>  {
>  	int i, ret;
> @@ -807,8 +854,9 @@ int st_lsm6dsx_fifo_setup(struct st_lsm6dsx_hw *hw)
>  		if (!hw->iio_devs[i])
>  			continue;
>  
> -		ret = devm_iio_kfifo_buffer_setup(hw->dev, hw->iio_devs[i],
> -						  &st_lsm6dsx_buffer_ops);
> +		ret = devm_iio_kfifo_buffer_setup_ext(hw->dev, hw->iio_devs[i],
> +						      &st_lsm6dsx_buffer_ops,
> +						      st_lsm6dsx_buffer_attrs);
>  		if (ret)
>  			return ret;
>  	}
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_core.c b/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_core.c
> index c65ad49829e7..e4922578329e 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_core.c
> @@ -1847,10 +1847,13 @@ static int st_lsm6dsx_write_raw(struct iio_dev *iio_dev,
>  
>  		val = val * 1000 + val2 / 1000;
>  		val = st_lsm6dsx_check_odr(sensor, val, &data);
> -		if (val < 0)
> +		if (val < 0) {
>  			err = val;
> -		else
> +		} else {
>  			sensor->odr = val;
> +			/* the batch data rate must not exceed the sensor ODR */
> +			sensor->bdr = min_t(u32, sensor->bdr, sensor->odr);
> +		}
>  		break;
>  	}
>  	default:
> @@ -2383,7 +2386,7 @@ static struct iio_dev *st_lsm6dsx_alloc_iiodev(struct st_lsm6dsx_hw *hw,
>  	sensor = iio_priv(iio_dev);
>  	sensor->id = id;
>  	sensor->hw = hw;
> -	sensor->odr = hw->settings->odr_table[id].odr_avl[0].milli_hz;
> +	sensor->odr = sensor->bdr = hw->settings->odr_table[id].odr_avl[0].milli_hz;

please add a new line to set sensor->bdr here.

>  	sensor->gain = hw->settings->fs_table[id].fs_avl[0].gain;
>  	sensor->watermark = 1;
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_shub.c b/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_shub.c
> index 3c5e65dc0f97..01d73002e888 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_shub.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_shub.c
> @@ -639,7 +639,7 @@ __st_lsm6dsx_shub_write_raw(struct iio_dev *iio_dev,
>  			return odr;
>  
>  		sensor->ext_info.slv_odr = val;
> -		sensor->odr = odr;
> +		sensor->odr = sensor->bdr = odr;
>  		return 0;
>  	}
>  	case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE:
> @@ -745,7 +745,7 @@ st_lsm6dsx_shub_alloc_iiodev(struct st_lsm6dsx_hw *hw,
>  	sensor = iio_priv(iio_dev);
>  	sensor->id = id;
>  	sensor->hw = hw;
> -	sensor->odr = hw->settings->odr_table[ref_id].odr_avl[0].milli_hz;
> +	sensor->odr = sensor->bdr = hw->settings->odr_table[ref_id].odr_avl[0].milli_hz;

please add a new line to set sensor->bdr here.

>  	sensor->ext_info.slv_odr = info->odr_table.odr_avl[0].milli_hz;
>  	sensor->gain = info->fs_table.fs_avl[0].gain;
>  	sensor->ext_info.settings = info;
> -- 
> 2.39.5
> 

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-09 22:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-09 17:36 [PATCH 0/2] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: Decouple sensor ODR from FIFO batch data rate Francesco Lavra
2025-10-09 17:36 ` [PATCH 1/2] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: Fix measurement unit for odr struct member Francesco Lavra
2025-10-09 20:40   ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2025-10-09 17:36 ` [PATCH 2/2] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: Decouple sensor ODR from FIFO batch data rate Francesco Lavra
2025-10-09 22:30   ` Lorenzo Bianconi [this message]
2025-10-10  7:12     ` Francesco Lavra
2025-10-10  8:13       ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2025-10-10  9:28         ` Francesco Lavra
2025-10-10 13:15           ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2025-10-10 15:50             ` David Lechner
2025-10-10 16:22               ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2025-10-10 16:23                 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-10-10 18:35                   ` Francesco Lavra
2025-10-10 14:55   ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-10-10 18:44     ` Francesco Lavra
2025-10-15 14:34       ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-10-10 17:44   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-10-10 18:50     ` Francesco Lavra
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-10-16 17:21 [PATCH v2 0/2] " Francesco Lavra
2025-10-16 17:21 ` [PATCH 2/2] " Francesco Lavra
2025-10-16 20:22   ` Lorenzo Bianconi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aOg3dg21aWNTF47x@lore-desk \
    --to=lorenzo@kernel.org \
    --cc=andy@kernel.org \
    --cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
    --cc=flavra@baylibre.com \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox