From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 619B52FB098; Mon, 13 Oct 2025 09:01:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1760346080; cv=none; b=kpBG/uXz+Ovot2p2mBrwmpsL/IBR6xJzdNaA+MaEchZi40tCgqGfWruS2CBQKLbGRqpnyIPBFlzUxQbOQ+OIIZZ631P98n4A3FF8YcmqYnqPoIsrag3VcFMLkxId9q3IeAlP/G4SYk/A7T3DIWdOixuVAYDGeHhiLGMas0W97Z8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1760346080; c=relaxed/simple; bh=3yfCTkEF2K27TRpkTh8vXfseBxxmeQwlUPMMM0DwyN4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ksbUcx3X9aaLcWCeZyQfhMNNSVVnmHtfgk9IH7sVhhHWgBoIhXAp5kLQBgNmdh5rxxChKe3NVfcvxsItlYEZxKs5k+MVKO4zixpxniAZO7hccI/xo7RiIG0ztKhkqulhWzyDLZeVTnqBqkhjwVnNTZs2LduYkq9wpLQWDADYKTI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=AEPfmbhk; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="AEPfmbhk" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1AE36C4CEFE; Mon, 13 Oct 2025 09:01:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1760346079; bh=3yfCTkEF2K27TRpkTh8vXfseBxxmeQwlUPMMM0DwyN4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=AEPfmbhk1vbe2dRsycUI8cBPNCBaXo5BpLwpsbcN2rkrx0+Okk6XUAz0I+6XFiH8I lt4xeXAcGTZSn0mWTxYvtH5tDTZ0d+itePReAJkDVV5YNwQG0myIiJr+NJ8DIUyCn+ JVzhMBVrz+lz6hpVbmJ5VFJXceb6CAumdo2Fkxt0OW09CwYQ0e8L+cvDlfiNRuwQmW yqLQPDxKpp3D7WM8ZU7flmUJtQ0VF2cCbwOET+YIHSDiXU/wvqd7CGQu9JvXxAYpgr SqucBiGva3uzG/ZgR0U+s5FFba8ZqY/jb2Z5/NjgUWOn7y4UgO2aTwRaewC3FFiR1G Rm00uk4LNslgA== Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2025 11:01:14 +0200 From: Niklas Cassel To: Frank Li Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam , Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Wilczy=C5=84ski?= , Kishon Vijay Abraham I , Bjorn Helgaas , Jon Mason , Dave Jiang , Allen Hubbe , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ntb@lists.linux.dev, imx@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] PCI: endpoint: Rename aligned_size to mem_size Message-ID: References: <20251009-vntb_msi_doorbell-v5-0-4cfb7b6c4be1@nxp.com> <20251009-vntb_msi_doorbell-v5-1-4cfb7b6c4be1@nxp.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251009-vntb_msi_doorbell-v5-1-4cfb7b6c4be1@nxp.com> On Thu, Oct 09, 2025 at 04:54:35PM -0400, Frank Li wrote: > Rename the variable aligned_size to mem_size to better reflect its purpose. > 'aligned_size' was misleading, as it actually represents the backing memory > size allocated for the BAR rather than an alignment value. > > Signed-off-by: Frank Li Reviewed-by: Niklas Cassel