From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Zecheng Li <zecheng@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Xu Liu <xliuprof@google.com>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 8/9] perf annotate: Improve type comparison from different scopes
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2025 10:46:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aP0M95FMF0fB48x9@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251013181607.2745653-9-zecheng@google.com>
On Mon, Oct 13, 2025 at 06:16:05PM +0000, Zecheng Li wrote:
> When comparing types from different scopes, first compare their type
> offsets. A larger offset means the field belongs to an outer
> (enclosing) struct. This helps resolve cases where a pointer is found
> in an inner scope, but a struct containing that pointer exists in an
> outer scope. Previously, is_better_type would prefer the pointer type,
> but the struct type is actually more complete and should be chosen.
Wouldn't the size check be sufficient? I think we need to get read of
the pointer preference.
>
> Prefer types from outer scopes when is_better_type cannot determine
> a better type. This sometimes helps pick a more complete type.
This code has a loop for the scopes so detecting larger struct would
work well?
Thanks,
Namhyung
>
> Signed-off-by: Zecheng Li <zecheng@google.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/util/annotate-data.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate-data.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate-data.c
> index 4b08331b9dd3..4b510eb29a5f 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/annotate-data.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate-data.c
> @@ -1629,7 +1629,9 @@ static int find_data_type_die(struct data_loc_info *dloc, Dwarf_Die *type_die)
> pr_debug_dtp("type_offset=%#x\n", type_offset);
> }
>
> - if (!found || is_better_type(type_die, &mem_die)) {
> + if (!found || dloc->type_offset < type_offset ||
> + (dloc->type_offset == type_offset &&
> + !is_better_type(&mem_die, type_die))) {
> *type_die = mem_die;
> dloc->type_offset = type_offset;
> found = true;
> --
> 2.51.0.788.g6d19910ace-goog
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-25 17:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-13 18:15 [PATCH v4 0/9] perf tools: Some improvements on data type profiler Zecheng Li
2025-10-13 18:15 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] perf annotate: Skip annotating data types to lea instructions Zecheng Li
2025-10-14 18:40 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2025-10-20 4:29 ` Namhyung Kim
2025-10-13 18:15 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] perf annotate: Track address registers via TSR_KIND_POINTER Zecheng Li
2025-10-13 18:16 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] perf annotate: Track arithmetic instructions on pointers Zecheng Li
2025-10-13 18:16 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] perf annotate: Save pointer offset in stack state Zecheng Li
2025-10-13 18:16 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] perf annotate: Invalidate register states for untracked instructions Zecheng Li
2025-10-13 18:16 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] perf dwarf-aux: Skip check_variable for die_find_variable_by_reg Zecheng Li
2025-10-13 18:16 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] perf dwarf-aux: Preserve typedefs in match_var_offset Zecheng Li
2025-10-25 17:40 ` Namhyung Kim
2025-10-13 18:16 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] perf annotate: Improve type comparison from different scopes Zecheng Li
2025-10-25 17:46 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2025-10-13 18:16 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] perf dwarf-aux: Support DW_OP_piece expressions Zecheng Li
2025-10-25 17:57 ` Namhyung Kim
2025-10-22 0:41 ` [PATCH v4 0/9] perf tools: Some improvements on data type profiler Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aP0M95FMF0fB48x9@google.com \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=xliuprof@google.com \
--cc=zecheng@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox