From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Ciju Rajan K <crajank@nvidia.com>
Cc: hdegoede@redhat.com, ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr,
platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, vadimp@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH platform-next v3 1/1] [PATCH platform-next] platform/mellanox: mlxreg-hotplug: Add support for handling interrupt storm
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2025 14:06:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aP9gWId8aav-LjA-@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250923134954.3016697-1-crajank@nvidia.com>
On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 04:49:54PM +0300, Ciju Rajan K wrote:
> In case of broken hardware, it is possible that broken device will
> flood interrupt handler with false events. For example, if fan or
> power supply has damaged presence pin, it will cause permanent
> generation of plugged in / plugged out events. As a result, interrupt
> handler will consume a lot of CPU resources and will keep raising
> "UDEV" events to the user space.
>
> This patch provides a mechanism to detect device causing interrupt
> flooding and mask interrupt for this specific device, to isolate
> from interrupt handling flow. Use the following criteria: if the
> specific interrupt was generated 'N' times during 'T' seconds,
> such device is to be considered as broken and will be closed for
> getting interrupts. User will be notified through the log error
> and will be instructed to replace broken device.
>
> Add fields for interrupt storm handling.
> Extend structure mlxreg_core_data with the following fields:
> 'wmark_cntr' - interrupt storm counter.
> 'wmark_window' - time window to count interrupts to check for storm.
>
> Extend structure mlxreg_core_item with the following field:
> 'storming_bits' - interrupt storming bits mask.
...
> for_each_set_bit(bit, &asserted, 8) {
> int pos;
>
> + /* Skip already marked storming bit. */
> + if (item->storming_bits & BIT(bit))
> + continue;
Instead, just mask "asserted" correspondingly before for-loop.
...
> struct mlxreg_core_data {
> u8 regnum;
> u8 slot;
> u8 secured;
> + unsigned int wmark_cntr;
> + unsigned long wmark_window;
Is it okay to use variadic (arch-dependent) types? The context suggests that
this data sturcture has fixed-width fields.
> };
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-27 12:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-23 13:49 [PATCH platform-next v3 1/1] [PATCH platform-next] platform/mellanox: mlxreg-hotplug: Add support for handling interrupt storm Ciju Rajan K
2025-10-27 12:06 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aP9gWId8aav-LjA-@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=crajank@nvidia.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vadimp@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox