From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
To: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
Cc: "Michael Hennerich" <Michael.Hennerich@analog.com>,
"Jonathan Cameron" <jic23@kernel.org>,
"Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iio: adc: ad7124: change setup reg allocation strategy
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2025 14:15:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aP9ifk-ms8RJi5ff@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250923-iio-adc-ad7124-change-setup-reg-allocation-strategy-v2-1-d9bf01bb3ad8@baylibre.com>
On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 04:48:04PM -0500, David Lechner wrote:
> Change the allocation strategy of the 8 SETUP registers from a least-
> recently-used (LRU) to a first-come-first-served basis.
>
> The AD7124 chips can have up to 16 channels enabled at a time in the
> sequencer for buffered reads, but only have 8 SETUP configurations
> (namely the OFFSET, GAIN, CONFIG and FILTER registers) that must be
> shared among the 16 channels. This means some of the channels must use
> the exact same configuration parameters so that they can share a single
> SETUP group of registers. The previous LRU strategy did not keep track
> of how many different configurations were requested at the same time,
> so if there were more than 8 different configurations requested, some
> channels would end up using the incorrect configuration because the slot
> assigned to them would also be assigned to a different configuration
> that wrote over it later.
>
> Adding such tracking to solve this would make an already complex
> algorithm even more complex. Instead we can replace it with a simpler
> first-come-first-serve strategy. This makes it easy to track how many
> different configurations are being requested at the same time. This
> comes at the expense of slightly longer setup times for buffered reads
> since all setup registers must be written each time when a buffered read
> is enabled. But this is generally not considered a hot path where
> performance is critical, so should be acceptable.
>
> This new strategy also makes hardware debugging easier since SETUPs are
> now assigned in a deterministic manner and in a logical order.
...
> +#define AD7124_CFG_SLOT_UNASSIGNED ~0U
Perhaps one of Uxx_MAX should be used instead?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-27 12:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-23 21:48 [PATCH v2] iio: adc: ad7124: change setup reg allocation strategy David Lechner
2025-09-26 12:27 ` Nuno Sá
2025-09-27 18:25 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-10-27 12:15 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aP9ifk-ms8RJi5ff@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
--cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox