From: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>
To: Pierre Barre <pierre@barre.sh>
Cc: Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@crudebyte.com>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
v9fs@lists.linux.dev, ericvh@kernel.org, lucho@ionkov.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] 9p: Use kvmalloc for message buffers on supported transports
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2025 16:26:22 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aPCeHj4vrDnc8R8v@codewreck.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7005d8d9-d42d-409f-b8e3-cd7207059eee@app.fastmail.com>
Pierre Barre wrote on Thu, Oct 16, 2025 at 09:01:56AM +0200:
> While developing a 9P server (https://github.com/Barre/ZeroFS) and
> testing it under high-load, I was running into allocation failures.
> The failures occur even with plenty of free memory available because
> kmalloc requires contiguous physical memory.
>
> This results in errors like:
> ls: page allocation failure: order:7, mode:0x40c40(GFP_NOFS|__GFP_COMP)
>
> This patch introduces a transport capability flag (supports_vmalloc)
> that indicates whether a transport can work with vmalloc'd buffers
> (non-physically contiguous memory). Transports requiring DMA should
> leave this flag as false.
>
> The fd-based transports (tcp, unix, fd) set this flag to true, and
> p9_fcall_init will use kvmalloc instead of kmalloc for these
> transports. This allows the allocator to fall back to vmalloc when
> contiguous physical memory is not available.
>
> Additionally, if kmem_cache_alloc fails, the code falls back to
> kvmalloc for transports that support it.
Looks good to me, I'll pick this up for -next when time allows and it'll
get in 6.19 in a few months
Now to get someone to make this work with virtio... :)
> @@ -252,7 +259,7 @@ void p9_fcall_fini(struct p9_fcall *fc)
> if (fc->cache)
> kmem_cache_free(fc->cache, fc->sdata);
> else
> - kfree(fc->sdata);
> + kvfree(fc->sdata);
(Oh, it's ok to kvfree() something allocated with either kmalloc
or kvmalloc, neat.)
--
Dominique Martinet | Asmadeus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-16 7:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-30 15:08 [PATCH] 9p: Use kvmalloc for message buffers Pierre Barre
2025-07-30 16:08 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2025-07-30 16:19 ` Pierre Barre
2025-07-30 17:28 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2025-07-30 20:16 ` Pierre Barre
2025-07-30 22:07 ` asmadeus
2025-07-31 0:36 ` Pierre Barre
2025-08-06 15:50 ` Pierre Barre
2025-08-06 21:44 ` Dominique Martinet
2025-08-08 11:12 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2025-10-16 7:01 ` [PATCH v2] 9p: Use kvmalloc for message buffers on supported transports Pierre Barre
2025-10-16 7:26 ` Dominique Martinet [this message]
2025-10-16 13:06 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2025-10-16 13:58 ` [PATCH v3] " Pierre Barre
2025-10-17 5:49 ` Christophe JAILLET
2025-11-03 7:52 ` asmadeus
2025-11-03 10:16 ` Pierre Barre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aPCeHj4vrDnc8R8v@codewreck.org \
--to=asmadeus@codewreck.org \
--cc=ericvh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux_oss@crudebyte.com \
--cc=lucho@ionkov.net \
--cc=pierre@barre.sh \
--cc=v9fs@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox