From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FE561E1C22; Thu, 16 Oct 2025 15:16:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1760627779; cv=none; b=reJi2NQ2YGJvMLMEWb/9h53Trw4Yg4P0E6GpWNthKhraO/beAVZEZ25Zi1iuEUaumYrrAvY3gTDdhK8FeNM2W3bgfeNmnJTDemWVh2rLHjtkcWyxC4hizbcU12vTT+cJiPMWyH1TP3kELHWhh9Dm5t7kCPVam++BK+jMqt4vBhM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1760627779; c=relaxed/simple; bh=c6jBR8EJqt9K3r1V0mUxxAx+8Q24oK/BcmBCgypzn3I=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=qnQLWmENe+StXE+KdGbg3PhkmfFsJg/D5uEq9WdgsTgseXT5kcvnACzQRCtg18myEMV1MnAxG1mP9dYeoaTbb5nrIo0JAqBOCcyfOfD+t2Q+a6nJTxpABcEsFmR9BDaGVFQsil87x1FgAN+SdDcyCupnO9vwvV55yH3c23It7K0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=FhxVMjnd; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="FhxVMjnd" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 02839C4CEF1; Thu, 16 Oct 2025 15:16:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1760627779; bh=c6jBR8EJqt9K3r1V0mUxxAx+8Q24oK/BcmBCgypzn3I=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=FhxVMjndmyBeuDMGBXVK/HalxbOtc0jP3Iio5LkWu2XztV5ZNQ2yLbS4xbmEPDnUu MAQSt2Vfyw37q5/V+3ouspJDX9XlL39rziB+wSbAEORMzeiv0RjgbXSBoHYNU1AqYV 5lWts9o6gVY7DzDiGWgSdgip4IMb1s9BlPGTgzjujVWzbL/asMaHoiA4LK1DdsQTzx NZj5uISnSA04cIP1o8s10AOKrmxveuRTI0l6ZnTn0kUmFIqDEuuQPms0xpQ1HhcU6e n9TddO8ixXzmKmAlZD3EUOxD09PuZspg2omExdX2b5N7IcS7HvDRSI2R+pV1dlCgwU 4fLBjIBhmDeaw== Received: from johan by xi.lan with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1v9PiG-000000006kJ-2Lct; Thu, 16 Oct 2025 17:16:21 +0200 Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2025 17:16:20 +0200 From: Johan Hovold To: kernel test robot , Thomas Gleixner Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, Florian Fainelli , Changhuang Liang Subject: Re: [tip:irq/drivers 11/18] drivers/irqchip/irq-imx-mu-msi.c:419:16: error: implicit declaration of function 'imx_mu_probe'; did you mean 'imx_mu_write'? Message-ID: References: <202510162257.g1RUy0bT-lkp@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <202510162257.g1RUy0bT-lkp@intel.com> On Thu, Oct 16, 2025 at 10:47:56PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: > tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git irq/drivers > head: 45f8fdcfbf4e49075172cf1a3fd812b90160e903 > commit: 4265aed28d7de2a643b8e441bc25344f421f2f78 [11/18] irqchip: Pass platform device to platform drivers > config: arm-randconfig-004-20251016 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251016/202510162257.g1RUy0bT-lkp@intel.com/config) > compiler: arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (GCC) 14.3.0 > reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251016/202510162257.g1RUy0bT-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) > > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of > the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags > | Reported-by: kernel test robot > | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202510162257.g1RUy0bT-lkp@intel.com/ > > All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): > > drivers/irqchip/irq-imx-mu-msi.c: In function 'imx_mu_imx7ulp_probe': > >> drivers/irqchip/irq-imx-mu-msi.c:419:16: error: implicit declaration of function 'imx_mu_probe'; did you mean 'imx_mu_write'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] > 419 | return imx_mu_probe(pdev, parent, &imx_mu_cfg_imx7ulp); > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ > | imx_mu_write > drivers/irqchip/irq-imx-mu-msi.c: At top level: > >> drivers/irqchip/irq-imx-mu-msi.c:299:12: warning: 'imx_mu_of_init' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] > 299 | static int imx_mu_of_init(struct platform_device *pdev, struct device_node *parent, > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Thomas, this looks like a bad edit on your part where you renamed imx_mu_probe() back to imx_mu_init() when you removed a line break from the function header. Johan