From: Vaibhav Gupta <vaibhavgupta40@gmail.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: Michael Buesch <m@bues.ch>, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] gpio: bt8xx: use generic PCI PM
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2025 16:37:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aPEfR_lwO1i2wGYb@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251013174319.GA847155@bhelgaas>
On Mon, Oct 13, 2025 at 12:43:19PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2025 at 03:52:59PM +0000, Vaibhav Gupta wrote:
> > Switch to the new generic PCI power management framework and remove legacy
> > callbacks like .suspend() and .resume(). With the generic framework, the
> > standard PCI related work like:
> > - pci_save/restore_state()
> > - pci_enable/disable_device()
> > - pci_set_power_state()
> > is handled by the PCI core and this driver should implement only gpio-bt8xx
> > specific operations in its respective callback functions.
>
> Tiny nits:
>
> s/use generic PCI PM/use generic power management/ # subject; not PCI
> s/new generic PCI power/generic power management/ # no longer "new" :)
>
> > Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Gupta <vaibhavgupta40@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpio/gpio-bt8xx.c | 29 +++++++----------------------
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-bt8xx.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-bt8xx.c
> > index 05401da03ca3..70b49c385b43 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-bt8xx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-bt8xx.c
> > @@ -52,10 +52,8 @@ struct bt8xxgpio {
> > struct pci_dev *pdev;
> > struct gpio_chip gpio;
> >
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> > u32 saved_outen;
> > u32 saved_data;
> > -#endif
> > };
> >
> > #define bgwrite(dat, adr) writel((dat), bg->mmio+(adr))
> > @@ -224,9 +222,9 @@ static void bt8xxgpio_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > pci_disable_device(pdev);
> > }
> >
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> > -static int bt8xxgpio_suspend(struct pci_dev *pdev, pm_message_t state)
> > +static int __maybe_unused bt8xxgpio_suspend(struct device *dev)
>
> I think __maybe_unused is unnecessary because of this path:
>
> DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS
> _DEFINE_DEV_PM_OPS
> SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS
> pm_sleep_ptr
> PTR_IF(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PM_SLEEP), (_ptr))
>
> Detailed explanation here:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/include/linux/util_macros.h?id=v6.17#n86
>
Fixed them in v6.
> > {
> > + struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> > struct bt8xxgpio *bg = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> >
> > scoped_guard(spinlock_irqsave, &bg->lock) {
>
> Unrelated to this patch, but it's not clear to me why bg->lock is
> needed here (or maybe anywhere).
>
> $ git grep -l "static int.*_suspend" drivers/gpio | wc -l
> 26
> $ git grep -W "static int.*_suspend" drivers/gpio | grep lock | grep -v unlock | wc -l
>
> It looks like only about 8 of the 26 gpio drivers that implement
> .suspend() protect it with a lock. I would expect a lock to be needed
> in all of them or none of them.
>
I can have a look at them.
regards,
Vaibhav
> > @@ -238,23 +236,13 @@ static int bt8xxgpio_suspend(struct pci_dev *pdev, pm_message_t state)
> > bgwrite(0x0, BT848_GPIO_OUT_EN);
> > }
> >
> > - pci_save_state(pdev);
> > - pci_disable_device(pdev);
> > - pci_set_power_state(pdev, pci_choose_state(pdev, state));
> > -
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > -static int bt8xxgpio_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > +static int __maybe_unused bt8xxgpio_resume(struct device *dev)
> > {
> > + struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> > struct bt8xxgpio *bg = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > - int err;
> > -
> > - pci_set_power_state(pdev, PCI_D0);
> > - err = pci_enable_device(pdev);
> > - if (err)
> > - return err;
> > - pci_restore_state(pdev);
> >
> > guard(spinlock_irqsave)(&bg->lock);
> >
> > @@ -267,10 +255,8 @@ static int bt8xxgpio_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> >
> > return 0;
> > }
> > -#else
> > -#define bt8xxgpio_suspend NULL
> > -#define bt8xxgpio_resume NULL
> > -#endif /* CONFIG_PM */
> > +
> > +static DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(bt8xxgpio_pm_ops, bt8xxgpio_suspend, bt8xxgpio_resume);
> >
> > static const struct pci_device_id bt8xxgpio_pci_tbl[] = {
> > { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_BROOKTREE, PCI_DEVICE_ID_BT848) },
> > @@ -286,8 +272,7 @@ static struct pci_driver bt8xxgpio_pci_driver = {
> > .id_table = bt8xxgpio_pci_tbl,
> > .probe = bt8xxgpio_probe,
> > .remove = bt8xxgpio_remove,
> > - .suspend = bt8xxgpio_suspend,
> > - .resume = bt8xxgpio_resume,
> > + .driver.pm = &bt8xxgpio_pm_ops,
> > };
> >
> > module_pci_driver(bt8xxgpio_pci_driver);
> > --
> > 2.51.0
> >
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-16 16:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-10 10:53 [PATCH v1] driver: gpio-bt8xx: use generic PCI PM Vaibhav Gupta
2025-10-11 1:43 ` kernel test robot
2025-10-11 10:26 ` Michael Büsch
2025-10-11 11:32 ` Vaibhav Gupta
2025-10-11 12:31 ` Michael Büsch
2025-10-11 12:37 ` Vaibhav Gupta
2025-10-11 12:57 ` [PATCH v3] " Vaibhav Gupta
2025-10-13 11:04 ` [PATCH v4] driver: gpio: bt8xx: " Vaibhav Gupta
2025-10-11 12:32 ` [PATCH v2] driver: gpio-bt8xx: " Vaibhav Gupta
2025-10-13 9:41 ` [PATCH v1] " Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-10-13 11:03 ` Vaibhav Gupta
2025-10-13 15:36 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-10-13 15:51 ` Vaibhav Gupta
2025-10-13 15:52 ` [PATCH v5] gpio: bt8xx: " Vaibhav Gupta
2025-10-13 17:43 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-10-16 16:36 ` [PATCH v6] gpio: bt8xx: use generic power management Vaibhav Gupta
2025-10-21 8:48 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-10-22 19:29 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-10-23 7:49 ` Vaibhav Gupta
2025-10-23 7:55 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-10-23 7:58 ` Vaibhav Gupta
2025-10-23 7:59 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-10-16 16:37 ` Vaibhav Gupta [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aPEfR_lwO1i2wGYb@gmail.com \
--to=vaibhavgupta40@gmail.com \
--cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m@bues.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox