From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>, <will@kernel.org>,
<oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev>, <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
<robin.murphy@arm.com>, <joro@8bytes.org>, <balbirs@nvidia.com>,
<miko.lenczewski@arm.com>, <peterz@infradead.org>,
<kevin.tian@intel.com>, <praan@google.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Populate smmu_domain->invs when attaching masters
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 12:05:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aPaIB7yJvlHba/9m@Asurada-Nvidia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251020121225.GK316284@nvidia.com>
On Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 09:12:25AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2025 at 02:11:34PM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 18, 2025 at 12:03:27AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> > > sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
> > > >> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c:3208:33: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces) @@ expected struct arm_smmu_invs **invs_ptr @@ got struct arm_smmu_invs [noderef] __rcu ** @@
> > > drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c:3208:33: sparse: expected struct arm_smmu_invs **invs_ptr
> > > drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c:3208:33: sparse: got struct arm_smmu_invs [noderef] __rcu **
> > ...
> > > > 3208 invst->invs_ptr = &new_smmu_domain->invs;
> > ...
> > > > 3247 rcu_assign_pointer(*invst->invs_ptr, invst->new_invs);
> >
> > Looks like we need:
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
> > index 8906c1625f428..398d8beb8f862 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
> > @@ -1105,7 +1105,7 @@ static inline bool arm_smmu_master_canwbs(struct arm_smmu_master *master)
> > * to_unref argument to an arm_smmu_invs_unref() call
> > */
> > struct arm_smmu_inv_state {
> > - struct arm_smmu_invs **invs_ptr;
> > + struct arm_smmu_invs __rcu **invs_ptr;
> > struct arm_smmu_invs *old_invs;
> > struct arm_smmu_invs *new_invs;
> > };
>
> Isn't it:
>
> struct arm_smmu_invs * __rcu *invs_ptr;
Hmm, sparse warns this:
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c:3257:33: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces)
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c:3257:33: expected struct arm_smmu_invs *[noderef] __rcu *invs_ptr
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c:3257:33: got struct arm_smmu_invs [noderef] __rcu **
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c:3275:33: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces)
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c:3275:33: expected struct arm_smmu_invs *[noderef] __rcu *invs_ptr
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c:3275:33: got struct arm_smmu_invs [noderef] __rcu **
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c:3296:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces):
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c:3296:9: struct arm_smmu_invs [noderef] __rcu *
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c:3296:9: struct arm_smmu_invs *
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c:3354:9: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces):
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c:3354:9: struct arm_smmu_invs [noderef] __rcu *
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c:3354:9: struct arm_smmu_invs *
3257: invst->invs_ptr = &new_smmu_domain->invs;
3296: rcu_assign_pointer(*invst->invs_ptr, invst->new_invs);
3354: rcu_assign_pointer(*invst->invs_ptr, new_invs);
But no warning with "struct arm_smmu_invs __rcu **invs_ptr".
Thanks
Nicolin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-20 19:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-15 19:42 [PATCH v3 0/7] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Introduce an RCU-protected invalidation array Nicolin Chen
2025-10-15 19:42 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Explicitly set smmu_domain->stage for SVA Nicolin Chen
2025-10-15 19:42 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add an inline arm_smmu_domain_free() Nicolin Chen
2025-10-15 19:42 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Introduce a per-domain arm_smmu_invs array Nicolin Chen
2025-10-16 19:18 ` kernel test robot
2025-10-16 21:31 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-10-17 13:47 ` kernel test robot
2025-10-17 20:12 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-10-20 12:10 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-20 19:16 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-10-27 12:06 ` kernel test robot
2025-10-27 16:38 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-10-15 19:42 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Pre-allocate a per-master invalidation array Nicolin Chen
2025-10-15 19:42 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Populate smmu_domain->invs when attaching masters Nicolin Chen
2025-10-17 16:03 ` kernel test robot
2025-10-17 21:11 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-10-20 12:12 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-20 19:05 ` Nicolin Chen [this message]
2025-10-15 19:42 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add arm_smmu_invs based arm_smmu_domain_inv_range() Nicolin Chen
2025-10-15 19:42 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Perform per-domain invalidations using arm_smmu_invs Nicolin Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aPaIB7yJvlHba/9m@Asurada-Nvidia \
--to=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=balbirs@nvidia.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=miko.lenczewski@arm.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=praan@google.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox