Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] printk: Use console_flush_one_record for legacy printer kthread

[Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>]

On Thu 2025-10-23 15:25:34, John Ogness wrote:
> On 2025-10-20, Andrew Murray <amurray@thegoodpenguin.co.uk> wrote:
> > diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk.c b/kernel/printk/printk.c
> > index 6c846d2d37d9d20bad58c6e3a7caada3be9552ca..2665a7a59f03b3a357b3346de1735606e77c3496 100644
> > --- a/kernel/printk/printk.c
> > +++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c
> > @@ -3644,17 +3644,26 @@ static bool legacy_kthread_should_wakeup(void)
> >  
> >  static int legacy_kthread_func(void *unused)
> >  {
> > -	for (;;) {
> > -		wait_event_interruptible(legacy_wait, legacy_kthread_should_wakeup());
> > +	bool try_again;
> > +
> > +wait_for_event:
> > +	wait_event_interruptible(legacy_wait, legacy_kthread_should_wakeup());
> > +
> > +	do {
> > +		u64 next_seq = 0;
> > +		bool handover = false;
> 
> Nit: I prefer to sort by line length:
> 
> 		bool handover = false;
> 		u64 next_seq = 0;

OK, no need to resend the patch. I'll change this when pushing it.

> With change:
> 
> Reviewed-by: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>

The patch looks good to me as well:

Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>

Best Regards,
Petr