From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, kbusch@kernel.org,
sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com, mahesh@linux.ibm.com,
oohall@gmail.com, Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com,
terry.bowman@amd.com, tianruidong@linux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/5] PCI/ERR: Use pcie_aer_is_native() to check for native AER control
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2025 06:03:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aPr6dBDUUohRUzYg@wunner.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <91cf33b4-7f67-4f3a-b095-e8f04d8c18e9@linux.alibaba.com>
On Fri, Oct 24, 2025 at 11:38:10AM +0800, Shuai Xue wrote:
> The remaining question is whether it would make more sense to rename
> pcie_clear_device_status() to pci_clear_device_error_status() and refine
> its behavior by adding a mask specifically for bits 0 to 3. Here's an
> example of the proposed change:
I don't see much value in renaming the function.
However clearing only bits 0-3 makes sense. PCIe r5.0 defined bit 6
as Emergency Power Reduction Detected with type RW1C in 2019. The
last time we touched pcie_clear_device_status() was in 2018 with
ec752f5d54d7 and we've been clearing all bits since forever,
not foreseeing that new ones with type RW1C might be added later.
I suggest defining a new macro in include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h
instead of using 0xf, say PCI_EXP_DEVSTA_ERR. Then you don't
need the code comment because the code is self-explanatory.
Thanks,
Lukas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-24 4:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-15 2:41 [PATCH v6 0/5] PCI/AER: Report fatal errors of RCiEP and EP if link recoverd Shuai Xue
2025-10-15 2:41 ` [PATCH v6 1/5] PCI/DPC: Clarify naming for error port in DPC Handling Shuai Xue
2025-10-15 2:41 ` [PATCH v6 2/5] PCI/DPC: Run recovery on device that detected the error Shuai Xue
2025-10-15 2:41 ` [PATCH v6 3/5] PCI/AER: Report fatal errors of RCiEP and EP if link recoverd Shuai Xue
2025-10-20 10:10 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-20 12:58 ` Shuai Xue
2025-10-20 13:54 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-20 14:17 ` Shuai Xue
2025-10-20 14:24 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-20 15:20 ` Shuai Xue
2025-10-23 10:48 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-24 6:43 ` Shuai Xue
2025-12-16 8:07 ` Shuai Xue
2025-10-20 18:38 ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2025-10-21 1:51 ` Shuai Xue
2025-10-15 2:41 ` [PATCH v6 4/5] PCI/ERR: Use pcie_aer_is_native() to check for native AER control Shuai Xue
2025-10-20 10:17 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-20 13:09 ` Shuai Xue
2025-10-20 13:58 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-20 14:45 ` Shuai Xue
2025-10-23 10:29 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-24 3:09 ` Shuai Xue
2025-10-24 3:14 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-24 3:38 ` Shuai Xue
2025-10-24 4:03 ` Lukas Wunner [this message]
2025-10-24 5:37 ` Shuai Xue
2025-10-20 18:43 ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2025-10-15 2:41 ` [PATCH v6 5/5] PCI/AER: Clear both AER fatal and non-fatal status Shuai Xue
2025-10-20 18:44 ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2025-10-21 1:33 ` Shuai Xue
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aPr6dBDUUohRUzYg@wunner.de \
--to=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mahesh@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=oohall@gmail.com \
--cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=terry.bowman@amd.com \
--cc=tianruidong@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox