From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bmailout1.hostsharing.net (bmailout1.hostsharing.net [83.223.95.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CF522877D2; Fri, 7 Nov 2025 06:33:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=83.223.95.100 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762497217; cv=none; b=H/tFAZhz814Z8B0ah0RVlcvhAZvCrkM8wI2zYsrBSFaxEkQdhPQntiXiwzQ/OlPp4GSawmY08w+Bwy6nIa/s8isAUUae0iZ0kHCqr/XyJvyg/wgYHXlQrGdWy+LiT45d+yks2LwF7nCvtrytOjhZ/ivfnldNYHR02Q7R0qmlrCc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762497217; c=relaxed/simple; bh=gjhNdhbX09NImVbFe6Szl845BIzLIYmjAsrq60zVgOw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=fBXQESVPj6kIAxt1b4nPWkvIZZPSL2IvbaQcScFkmPqyIZTzxG5Y+MGpE3dkkD/51rkpFDxe2pWEileF9cxsjwOsrfGEtACeK4sI5IEhRQ1igp+iHSOtbEtnd4hBhWD/B5l3aWjaY3M0p6yPey5pzUBMI0HxahoT0qw7rF9MzUQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=wunner.de; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=h08.hostsharing.net; arc=none smtp.client-ip=83.223.95.100 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=wunner.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=h08.hostsharing.net Received: from h08.hostsharing.net (h08.hostsharing.net [83.223.95.28]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "*.hostsharing.net", Issuer "RapidSSL TLS RSA CA G1" (verified OK)) by bmailout1.hostsharing.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15FDC2C06414; Fri, 7 Nov 2025 07:33:31 +0100 (CET) Received: by h08.hostsharing.net (Postfix, from userid 100393) id 0B73549A; Fri, 7 Nov 2025 07:33:31 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2025 07:33:31 +0100 From: Lukas Wunner To: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Christian Zigotzky , Manivannan Sadhasivam , mad skateman , "R . T . Dickinson" , Darren Stevens , John Paul Adrian Glaubitz , luigi burdo , Al , Roland , Hongxing Zhu , hypexed@yahoo.com.au, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] PCI/ASPM: Allow quirks to avoid L0s and L1 Message-ID: References: <20251106183643.1963801-1-helgaas@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251106183643.1963801-1-helgaas@kernel.org> On Thu, Nov 06, 2025 at 12:36:37PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > L1 PM Substates and Clock PM in particular are a problem because they > depend on CLKREQ# and sometimes device-specific configuration, and none of > this is discoverable in a generic way. According to PCIe r7.0 sec 7.5.3.7, the "Enable Clock Power Management" bit is "applicable only for Upstream Ports and with form factors that support a Clock Request (CLKREQ#) mechanism". Thus, if BIOS has set the "Enable Clock Power Management" bit on a Downstream Port, we can infer that CLKREQ# is supported. Thanks, Lukas