From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
To: Dan Scally <dan.scally@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: "Qiu Wenbo" <qiuwenbo@gnome.org>,
"Daniel Scally" <djrscally@gmail.com>,
"Hans de Goede" <hansg@kernel.org>,
"Qiu Wenbo" <qiuwenbo@kylinsec.com.cn>,
platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>,
"Sakari Ailus" <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: int3472: Fix double free of GPIO device during unregister
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2025 12:02:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aQCUu5vCPlglC0Kd@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5007d7f0-76ff-41fd-a371-05922c97f8ef@ideasonboard.com>
On Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 08:55:07AM +0000, Dan Scally wrote:
> On 24/10/2025 06:05, Qiu Wenbo wrote:
> >
> > regulator_unregister() already frees the associated GPIO device. On
> > ThinkPad X9 (Lunar Lake), this causes a double free issue that leads to
> > random failures when other drivers (typically Intel THC) attempt to
> > allocate interrupts. The root cause is that the reference count of the
> > pinctrl_intel_platform module unexpectedly drops to zero when this
> > driver defers its probe.
> >
> > This behavior can also be reproduced by unloading the module directly.
> >
> > Fix the issue by removing the redundant release of the GPIO device
> > during regulator unregistration.
> >
> > Fixes: 1e5d088a52c2 ("platform/x86: int3472: Stop using devm_gpiod_get()")
> However the Fixes tag I wonder about; devm_gpiod_get() will also result in a
> call to gpiod_put() when the module is unloaded; doesn't that mean that the
> same issue will occur before that commit?
Actually a good question! To me sounds like it's a bug(?) in regulator code.
It must not release resources it didn't acquire. This sounds like a clear
layering violation.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-28 10:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-24 5:05 [PATCH] platform/x86: int3472: Fix double free of GPIO device during unregister Qiu Wenbo
2025-10-24 6:15 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-10-24 7:25 ` Sakari Ailus
2025-10-28 6:30 ` [PATCH v2] " Qiu Wenbo
2025-10-28 9:34 ` Hans de Goede
2025-10-28 16:37 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-10-28 8:55 ` [PATCH] " Dan Scally
2025-10-28 10:02 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2025-10-28 10:38 ` Hans de Goede
2025-10-28 10:54 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-10-28 11:09 ` Dan Scally
2025-10-28 11:38 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-10-28 14:36 ` Hans de Goede
2025-10-28 14:47 ` Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aQCUu5vCPlglC0Kd@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=dan.scally@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=djrscally@gmail.com \
--cc=hansg@kernel.org \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qiuwenbo@gnome.org \
--cc=qiuwenbo@kylinsec.com.cn \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox