From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8562A2550AF; Tue, 28 Oct 2025 14:51:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.13 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761663093; cv=none; b=ZYdgoUynNfXI0kMQQD5/Go+JA3uznBHTlCkEPxDyTpFOf3kPMkxDRBHoNmM93KMJpZPcZcno1FJjSrRxn/PNHlhrKPn4D236himN8VcNK0LjUKzZ/4bEG21qt4FCooqv4vW+oln8haa75jYQ3RROfiyBkd6FnGIcDJvUhGoLRdk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761663093; c=relaxed/simple; bh=glytEKyAwbMVi2/7pNGHv7X6xwlwzIprNdGWYsCZk+0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ZeCE2O6TdzRf3SF0q0VMMG5KJHhsErn1nYdZuk+rnzbRYNNV+4LLgd6OieMTNUcMvg6V7SDZ/vgp6o9n0YtbyERZf2xr3iRA/5qhmYX2TMRvtv+rNbfCQjGEbfBtpZy8vdfW39ElnU9l17gCGn5uGwa8gMnL+x2aqkn13H0Wx/8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=M1kOWj/U; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.13 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="M1kOWj/U" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1761663092; x=1793199092; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=glytEKyAwbMVi2/7pNGHv7X6xwlwzIprNdGWYsCZk+0=; b=M1kOWj/ULCin5KwXun1kCmqxk4/7P82tkXrfxOBx//Ts608CxtPk/Gsg oLiX/HCydrypGsA0dswh9FOFVWwIGGFIzA0yBVGbY3vxO/Cckl5caH0KO 8e7sMO1wbDMaXBWAcZfyPKFLCKGFbO1NhAi+HRHMaCyM9CN/HtjvhpDXb lBALzY3P4ff/bzDMliwNIbLBCjdddzSNYmdcKhAASS01Ek6zJOA+Emav3 wK7s2W2aGDTYgLtwgZ4HzYlK+v/ghTUg2xJ/OC8VccJXz2PkgvU/oKoLp zWnvJI+FjNoc7j9ud485G6LqQ8OCBKKoECMrzkxAWGgJ92Q66XYYq7fuv Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: yoJXj2TtTTqNd/78Pfk8cA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: NtpwJPpcTrihxsD2D6gljw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11586"; a="66380922" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.19,261,1754982000"; d="scan'208";a="66380922" Received: from fmviesa002.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.142]) by fmvoesa107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 28 Oct 2025 07:51:31 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 6moAjRlNTzmLVxk8Bs4uIQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: fzkGLTy6Rp2yFdFhD6uvmA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.19,261,1754982000"; d="scan'208";a="208958106" Received: from dalessan-mobl3.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO ashevche-desk.local) ([10.245.244.136]) by fmviesa002-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 28 Oct 2025 07:51:28 -0700 Received: from andy by ashevche-desk.local with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1vDl2j-00000003LJN-33uh; Tue, 28 Oct 2025 16:51:25 +0200 Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2025 16:51:25 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Chen-Yu Tsai Cc: Nuno =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=E1?= , Jonathan Cameron , David Lechner , Nuno =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=E1?= , Andy Shevchenko , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: core: Use datasheet name as fallback for label Message-ID: References: <20251027124210.788962-1-wens@kernel.org> <20251027144327.09f59982@jic23-huawei> <5e3bf0d87ae1b539d134edefee67d3e3ef3b46cb.camel@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 10:36:35PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > On Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 5:22 PM Nuno Sá wrote: ... > The axp20x-adc driver currently provides _no_ labels. Would adding labels > now be considered backward incompatible? It can be considered forward-incompatible :-) This kind of discussions happen in IIO in the past and probably still will in the future. Namely "What should be unique (enough?) string to recognise chip (platform?)?" So, you see, we need to answer first "What do we want to recognise? The platform or the chip?" Then decide what uniquiness will be enough. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko