From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
Cc: "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>,
mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/fpu: Ensure XFD state on signal delivery
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2025 10:37:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aQD_cZzqml1vindY@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aEeAl9Hp7sSizrl8@intel.com>
On Tue, Jun 10, 2025, Chao Gao wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 09, 2025 at 05:16:59PM -0700, Chang S. Bae wrote:
> >Sean reported [1] the following splat when running KVM tests:
> >
> > WARNING: CPU: 232 PID: 15391 at xfd_validate_state+0x65/0x70
> > Call Trace:
> > <TASK>
> > fpu__clear_user_states+0x9c/0x100
> > arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x142/0x210
> > exit_to_user_mode_loop+0x55/0x100
> > do_syscall_64+0x205/0x2c0
> > entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53
> >
> >Chao further identified [2] a reproducible scenarios involving signal
> >delivery: a non-AMX task is preempted by an AMX-enabled task which
> >modifies the XFD MSR.
> >
> >When the non-AMX task resumes and reloads XSTATE with init values,
> >a warning is triggered due to a mismatch between fpstate::xfd and the
> >CPU's current XFD state. fpu__clear_user_states() does not currently
> >re-synchronize the XFD state after such preemption.
> >
> >Invoke xfd_update_state() which detects and corrects the mismatch if the
> >dynamic feature is enabled.
> >
> >This also benefits the sigreturn path, as fpu__restore_sig() may call
> >fpu__clear_user_states() when the sigframe is inaccessible.
> >
> >Fixes: 672365477ae8a ("x86/fpu: Update XFD state where required")
> >Reported-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> >Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/aDCo_SczQOUaB2rS@google.com [1]
> >Tested-by: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
> >Signed-off-by: Chang S. Bae <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
> >Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> >Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/aDWbctO%2FRfTGiCg3@intel.com [2]
>
> Reviewed-by: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
>
> Thanks for looking into this issue.
Ping. I _think_ this is still needed? AFAICT, it just fell through the cracks.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-28 17:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-10 0:16 [PATCH] x86/fpu: Ensure XFD state on signal delivery Chang S. Bae
2025-06-10 0:47 ` Chao Gao
2025-10-28 17:37 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aQD_cZzqml1vindY@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
--cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).