From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-yw1-f175.google.com (mail-yw1-f175.google.com [209.85.128.175]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EE3C1E1E12 for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2025 18:20:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.175 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761675616; cv=none; b=cEH7kVDwfYfDtxdul7jKdbLh33XdLNC7KTDcIHJT4vfnbioZ2DqXyHn1XQV16iAt2mdlSsk24GLBaEEcgAvWPldHD/+RIV8Ya6qIdOMeAJtbMgJFM0H/09cPsVc/vMGLdwmwhOo88giv1hThmhUX9LUn43Mf3D83xbJEkLt7V40= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761675616; c=relaxed/simple; bh=fVD8zVGoOJR8NtTaumfAAfOnBXb59cGQbZXEVlQfwd8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=mfs20Vt9sxiNZCvObRndVMGN0dmcZrJzySUG9xZmMMouKt67UfITaegawTs9C7SqJOFQjd8fsk2Vnty/AI7Ioctl7aqr3l9atOd72byENECFqDkCCltulV+07bQo2Vm04Hqy9TPlHrAz1fcHyV113OfoGTdRgabk0PJaDMVd+J0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=NrK9+tTZ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.175 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="NrK9+tTZ" Received: by mail-yw1-f175.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-78487b0960bso67875697b3.2 for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2025 11:20:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1761675613; x=1762280413; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=e+rUkvl/D9zKzyhn+VEYSVN5inKSvpG15TNg9Q9Niq8=; b=NrK9+tTZmtBoFdCEqOScvruet8btNL0A/WQIwbU3hkehG1AbI08JEmxsP5BfqQOX7a tXoYBGb0LQx2FYPOAEkfXMCw0mOebE8IrIlVM7cf8AQXDZ9bhMA9rV0iKd4UeAYyQ4aP H//SXIbO7HrnmBmMDGIzb/taC/32jDu1fenhChBvVpZ8orobcwRbSl+hrcD/PIxNeIsR S/qoVdm2HBpdwhNPNkpa+4f9JlhxenUdpY+Xn6uSZ6ntM+1byLwMShcG7SVBPQX+8mX3 PPGEWCPJjNK7UOPWV45JBcqRK39tqroXcFYlOt47J/+TQmcUfQp5ZA49fh8g4GLIpNfZ FsBw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1761675613; x=1762280413; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=e+rUkvl/D9zKzyhn+VEYSVN5inKSvpG15TNg9Q9Niq8=; b=wCpZe10tKwDmrqeavSEWntw5cN7RDUCalxNttP6V0A4J5T0ChqY7aBGEYeFfmCTgq+ C15PhUyQoj2NaIEjBfyt5tf817vz5uw2cB557+6qM8YXYNxp5DHQKMur6suvZkhZ+Usp jO2Xe6mybJ2+IF4LKPC1znv7g4pudc3s3JFpSiTaBB9cZgD9cEa5FfdVrqFtgPwkBcc8 +Nr0HU/cNBW4+elLCcvqDOKElBIW5milAi3zt1/PkTz/ycJoVNg8GvGVqJIkFcZIc6X4 Z4ueRpCAz/QKFldMpYzjv8p9zBSgeMeO5x7bVE1AXaZgST7c97mZGnK1tEt//8YN7t4M savA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXE35B2Ms9tY1LLDWiZMDpfq6K7IN4ziJXuMESB3DuVzszrYbkvGEtw//aVeCEyjjVg20zAcIZipRoy45M=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxTv75Ez1ixYg0RqCSzvB3MKSg4QSN4Hfpe87at8Rnq1dcv9heu w6Bb8OnOMW4kD7e/Wqq7Tzs7B7tc5gI+d4xrtTAsg8mWRRconKVtM6Lv X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvLZNSaqTSDn+HcBNUzmObLJ5jCyl0qTn4Dvl4jeuPLScXNOUBRXAWCM8becBs H83vvAR1a03sUY2BUqT9Qyd23JBPcx3wARPiF10jbpkj4/kokI0VgVX2Vu/XRBhcqlpLUQof7UL UvUoUfpXrfEIeNhPnAkrtKLkikFqfqdPXzXsDivE58Ey7V7QOmNCVIm9zkfZdd4u4AbxZ/mffQz potC9fe9dUWAXW5L/pXgq+NAfClnHIk5BiB5eFgzOUQXNYROXx6aR/nw/OnJaK7klhyCzUdqTWC ElE4zXXrjmYYe4PKUCWXeX9yOIVfuZDznCDOxhPJwGFGpHfbM1LHcIfaWhUa0Fv/HF4/JKPvCov t7BceOm9Brjrpgg1PlNXo2yYq1CLbmL4T4p75j/b/uljIdH59NrucGOqd4EwtQsrNH+L9JQEiPs Wr+wiEeiI/n5tcmJm5ql3WJ+1yan5B5joGfmJa X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IECradbC/V5zPn66y4q4ZGUhUmHrlC+iHH0inghtcGySqIEBdHH/OeoOeHNcRqi2EB+aeyQgA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:690c:25c3:b0:783:7081:c48a with SMTP id 00721157ae682-78628e7d68emr2711617b3.26.1761675613298; Tue, 28 Oct 2025 11:20:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from devvm11784.nha0.facebook.com ([2a03:2880:25ff:71::]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 00721157ae682-785ed14081dsm29213987b3.6.2025.10.28.11.20.12 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 28 Oct 2025 11:20:12 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2025 11:20:11 -0700 From: Bobby Eshleman To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: Simon Horman , Stefano Garzarella , Shuah Khan , virtualization@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Bobby Eshleman Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 03/12] selftests/vsock: reuse logic for vsock_test through wrapper functions Message-ID: References: <20251022-vsock-selftests-fixes-and-improvements-v1-0-edeb179d6463@meta.com> <20251022-vsock-selftests-fixes-and-improvements-v1-3-edeb179d6463@meta.com> <20251027162244.0101a099@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251027162244.0101a099@kernel.org> On Mon, Oct 27, 2025 at 04:22:44PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Mon, 27 Oct 2025 12:08:48 -0700 Bobby Eshleman wrote: > > > > shellcheck has some (new) things to say about this patch too. > > > > Could you take a look over them? > > > > It looks like the errors are SC2317 and SC2119, but are false-positives. > > Invoking a program as a variable (e.g., "${VSOCK_TEST}") is tripping > > SC2317 (command unreachable), and SC2119 is due to log_{guest,host}() > > being passed zero arguments (logging its stdin instead). > > > > I also see that SC2317 has many other false positives elsewhere in the > > file (80+), reporting even lines like `rm "${QEMU_PIDFILE}"` as > > unreachable. I wonder if we should add a patch to this series to disable > > this check at the file-level? > > Yes, FWIW, don't hesitate to disable things at the file level. > We should probably revisit which of the checks need to be disabled > globally. But file level is also useful for manual testing. Got it, will do! Thanks, Bobby