From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
To: Francesco Lavra <flavra@baylibre.com>
Cc: "Lorenzo Bianconi" <lorenzo@kernel.org>,
"Jonathan Cameron" <jic23@kernel.org>,
"David Lechner" <dlechner@baylibre.com>,
"Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: dynamically initialize iio_chan_spec data
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2025 10:32:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aQR0Iy2UJn9-XxpG@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3e7944588d3011b6a144d70ab9027a05a1e230d0.camel@baylibre.com>
On Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 09:26:19AM +0100, Francesco Lavra wrote:
> On Thu, 2025-10-30 at 17:42 +0100, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> > > + chan->ext_info = st_lsm6dsx_ext_info;
> > > + if (id == ST_LSM6DSX_ID_ACC) {
> > > + if (hw->settings->event_settings.wakeup_reg.addr) {
> >
> > if (id == ST_LSM6DSX_ID_ACC &&
> > hw->settings->event_settings.wakeup_reg.addr) {
> > ...
> > }
>
> In patch 4/9, the inner conditional will be replaced by more generic code,
> so we would revert to if (id == ST_LSM6DSX_ID_ACC) [...]
Hmm... The obvious follow up question is why can't we stick with the original
conditional to begin with?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-31 8:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-30 7:27 [PATCH 0/9] st_lsm6dsx: add tap event detection Francesco Lavra
2025-10-30 7:27 ` [PATCH 1/9] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: dynamically initialize iio_chan_spec data Francesco Lavra
2025-10-30 7:57 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-10-30 11:03 ` Francesco Lavra
2025-10-30 16:42 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2025-10-31 8:04 ` Francesco Lavra
2025-10-31 8:09 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-10-31 8:26 ` Francesco Lavra
2025-10-31 8:32 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2025-10-31 11:43 ` Francesco Lavra
2025-11-02 11:16 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-11-03 9:24 ` Francesco Lavra
2025-11-09 13:32 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-10-30 7:27 ` [PATCH 2/9] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: make event_settings more generic Francesco Lavra
2025-10-30 16:44 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2025-10-31 8:08 ` Francesco Lavra
2025-10-30 7:27 ` [PATCH 3/9] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: move wakeup event enable mask to event_src Francesco Lavra
2025-10-30 7:59 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-10-30 7:27 ` [PATCH 4/9] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: dynamically allocate iio_event_spec structs Francesco Lavra
2025-11-02 11:22 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-10-30 7:27 ` [PATCH 5/9] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: rework code to check for enabled events Francesco Lavra
2025-10-30 7:27 ` [PATCH 6/9] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: remove event_threshold field from hw struct Francesco Lavra
2025-10-30 8:01 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-10-30 11:10 ` Francesco Lavra
2025-10-30 13:49 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-11-02 11:29 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-11-02 13:45 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-11-03 9:34 ` Francesco Lavra
2025-11-03 9:40 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-11-03 14:53 ` David Lechner
2025-11-09 13:31 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-10-30 7:27 ` [PATCH 7/9] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: make event management functions generic Francesco Lavra
2025-10-30 8:15 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-10-30 11:17 ` Francesco Lavra
2025-10-30 13:36 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-11-02 11:33 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-10-30 7:27 ` [PATCH 8/9] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: add event configurability on a per axis basis Francesco Lavra
2025-10-30 8:24 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-10-30 11:23 ` Francesco Lavra
2025-10-30 13:56 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-11-17 19:23 ` Francesco Lavra
2025-11-18 10:44 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-11-18 11:01 ` Francesco Lavra
2025-11-20 9:05 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-11-20 11:43 ` Francesco Lavra
2025-11-20 13:59 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-11-20 18:31 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-11-21 9:14 ` Francesco Lavra
2025-11-21 9:31 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-11-21 14:57 ` Francesco Lavra
2025-12-07 15:11 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-10-30 7:27 ` [PATCH 9/9] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: add tap event detection Francesco Lavra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aQR0Iy2UJn9-XxpG@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=flavra@baylibre.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox