From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4B5228726E; Sat, 1 Nov 2025 06:41:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761979282; cv=none; b=KyJmHQPZGdySBffnt+exTmRC+k1ZKxxuN/30AzyRgtE5Hi67fmYEd2ziZJYIBQZmxGN3+Fr5o/NPKabhHb59PemaZNFvfMup2QU3EMcWXf5huaCoMA/l1EtfwdDTMVrKc+7NQR0xhRjMQw75MnDp68DBf1+sraCN142+iSs+whg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761979282; c=relaxed/simple; bh=UbDxu5FMOTRlsVK/fGGT2kWvJEohoNcEYsiYPtWszRo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Z6BvXHfWrGOntPWbjOf9jadNazMX6fBhjO8TiNG9fcUExZ+B7WYliL/7FUf5zA2fdNVGxyZYwR/h6aBqmgdVt5c9fRCGqmf6SkYk8Nn/1xh0QzeViMUHpHOtVdv6OQ0MECy88KtiZYQRvV6AKbbfuFZX2Xz7d+deak+CvDKgGFM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=XNy/2qZD; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="XNy/2qZD" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DBC6AC4CEF1; Sat, 1 Nov 2025 06:41:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1761979282; bh=UbDxu5FMOTRlsVK/fGGT2kWvJEohoNcEYsiYPtWszRo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=XNy/2qZDkf6cTFisAqjZEPk0GeMWNf4shWg9SaX3+n1Pc4lTzmOAewtVG/DBK1x20 lzeu36PLyeyYwQymLnXZi5jtH30Zbbqbsbfb0S7TvZkhqbwL6QiJb0dWs/DG9Hy2Wp HKSnrvnkF2hbvgIHtD6QBO/+tzbsueuMoSRXJBauOd99LWkebNyz5YIFaKbaf7CGpB 7PD1/r4Q0SlUWAGdX7nnDsz8uTnyzBql/egebSx8e8hoGB5BQzywfUnnn8aJhsgqKE YS3A8juYO6jqOxWImiEAUHwQ45mgASBLX7eJNdqOJblYklv6PPBWbQM5mFIfxTPKRC TXvPW05Lu3+0g== Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2025 07:41:11 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree Message-ID: References: <20251031120243.4394e6a8@canb.auug.org.au> <20251031092150.GS3245006@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20251031095658.GT4068168@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251031095658.GT4068168@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> * Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 10:21:50AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 12:02:43PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (arm64 defconfig) > > > failed like this: > > > > arm64-defconfig builds just fine on tip/master, must be some conflict > > with the arm64 tree or so. Let me go have a peek. > > N/m, someone removed core/rseq already.. *sigh* Had to exclude it to fix -next, but it's still all there, just do: git merge origin/core/rseq ... and it will merge cleanly. Thanks, Ingo