From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07AA6274B23; Mon, 3 Nov 2025 13:57:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762178232; cv=none; b=B3JT5+0Uvkh8xV4f3V/qQVxR+6fBfeU3jGgA8bMzBdXOjM+wopdVi3qB8pOkxucR5jpyn1Hos5By1CWzxjGNtbXJY6TO3zaCew5HK2voXoik7nKxqCfW/kY96AMJWDr4vYg412k81g3HgRUx2gJNc6csGMscVjYEOf+yPYCIoNM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762178232; c=relaxed/simple; bh=hzY6n+eX6J17ms7RYj6QcyV+5xeIMI7YII9U78eOm4Q=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=TyuyDRPpDMl9mJR6cnaFFXtQE6zpQWKvZVPKM/Yu1p1a79Qh4cZsNckv7akK1DkWwRnCe/oVE9LFjPnZQGyyTpKWoowzgRF+9eaFW6nMAcChFSCMjLFLJxphMTtrNxeLStC+ocgkm+/klb7S7DxVIuefBVuSe9fTLjz4BC3Na7Q= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Vs83dZXC; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Vs83dZXC" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E8168C116B1; Mon, 3 Nov 2025 13:57:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1762178231; bh=hzY6n+eX6J17ms7RYj6QcyV+5xeIMI7YII9U78eOm4Q=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Vs83dZXCssl3QeZOddSsshHZYo13LiOT2XDeEv7OUTXtQtK+a1F/HfaY1J0GtBFjJ SvGRcKYhmUyhcI9uiSWV56oARNtEr+3atK3gG5vjFlf3E1FFLFe9myS3GTXJAx51PV m3BQu+MC7L8HIYbENzpsGfWUftaUFhxIiZwa/oDOS7an08ATHw1MS/CKuOFYLbsLFa Vt+gldEXPLK39Y7XTn+v1IR0BWUEze5aHzNGGuT9NknUmclxKDtVRfcReNmumxZAjd K7qAM3rNaZh2VZh8icq5T4uzNDTz0GFw4iDMqr/AjFNcpPM39wUbu8Ofrn8f9RJj6W ARxiQE7UX6dMw== Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2025 13:57:06 +0000 From: Simon Horman To: Tariq Toukan Cc: Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Saeed Mahameed , Leon Romanovsky , Mark Bloch , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Gal Pressman , Carolina Jubran Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V2 1/7] net/mlx5e: Enhance function structures for self loopback prevention application Message-ID: References: <1761831159-1013140-1-git-send-email-tariqt@nvidia.com> <1761831159-1013140-2-git-send-email-tariqt@nvidia.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1761831159-1013140-2-git-send-email-tariqt@nvidia.com> On Thu, Oct 30, 2025 at 03:32:33PM +0200, Tariq Toukan wrote: > The re-application of self loopback prevention attributes in TIRs is > necessary in old firmwares (where tis_tir_td_order cap is cleared) after > recreation of SQs. > > However, this is not needed in new firmware with tis_tir_td_order=1. > > As a preparation patch, enhance the function structures to differentiate > between an explicit loopback prevention configuration apply, and the > re-apply operation required by old firmware. > > Loopback selftests should now call mlx5e_modify_tirs_lb() directly, as > their use case is not related to the firmware limitation. > > Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan > Reviewed-by: Carolina Jubran Reviewed-by: Simon Horman