From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Cc: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
Wojciech Siudy <wojciech.siudy@nokia.com>,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: muxes: pca954x: Fix broken reset-gpio usage
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2025 16:48:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aQjOwInKQWIVdjQJ@shikoro> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <69ef304b-491a-4434-97c1-97eccd99ea66@linaro.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1039 bytes --]
> Maybe I should also add to emphasize:
>
> That offending commit 690de2902dca breaks the ABI which was:
> 1. documented at
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mux-pca954x.yaml (line 57)
> 2. implemented in Linux kernel around v3.14.
>
> This ABI breakage was not justified at all, not explained not even
> mentioned in the commit msg, which is a requirement (see writing
> bindings document).
We were under the assumption that the reset-core will provide exactly
the same functionality at a centralized place. It made sense to me, too,
to avoid all the open-coded reset-gpio handlings in various drivers. I
only learnt from Morimoto-san's regression report that things were not
as I thought.
So, I sent out an RFC to discuss how to handle this issue. And if even
Philipp as the maintainer did not point me directly to revert the
offending i2c-mux commit, despite it is "obviously" sooo wrong, then
probably that optional fallback part in the reset-core needs way more
explanations and documentation.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-03 15:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-03 15:19 [PATCH] i2c: muxes: pca954x: Fix broken reset-gpio usage Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-11-03 15:36 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-11-03 15:48 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2025-11-03 17:05 ` Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aQjOwInKQWIVdjQJ@shikoro \
--to=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=peda@axentia.se \
--cc=wojciech.siudy@nokia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox