public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
	Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>,
	Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@redhat.com>,
	Alasdair Kergon <agk@redhat.com>, DMML <dm-devel@lists.linux.dev>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] dm-ebs: Mark full buffer dirty even on partial write
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2025 10:01:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aR2HZWE-v-umP7jI@pc636> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251119090010.GA24598@lst.de>

On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 10:00:10AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 09:57:49AM +0100, Uladzislau Rezki wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 09:53:28AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 09:43:13AM +0100, Uladzislau Rezki wrote:
> > > > Well. LBA is fixed in my case. Just only one format which is 512B.
> > > > 
> > > > Whereas the I/O can not be performed by using LBAs sizes. It is fixed
> > > > and bigger.
> > > 
> > > Then it is not an LBA.  The LBA is defined as the minimum block size
> > > you can do I/O on.  Aka your device is really gravely broken.  What
> > > device is this and who is selling it?
> > > 
> > I define UBS - underlying block size. The lower layer expects BIOs in
> > that sizes but this is not true.
> > 
> > I am not allowed to disclose and answer your last question.
> 
> Well.  Let's frame it differently:  this device is just to broken
> to be used with Linux.  In theory we could quirk based on the vendor
> ID to correctly report the logical block size, but for that we'd
> need the information.
> 
/*
 * Construct an emulated block size mapping: <dev_path> <offset> <ebs> [<ubs>]
 *
 * <dev_path>: path of the underlying device
 * <offset>: offset in 512 bytes sectors into <dev_path>
 * <ebs>: emulated block size in units of 512 bytes exposed to the upper layer
 * [<ubs>]: underlying block size in units of 512 bytes imposed on the lower layer;
 *	    optional, if not supplied, retrieve logical block size from underlying device
 */
static int ebs_ctr(struct dm_target *ti, unsigned int argc, char **argv)
{

Again i rely on this.

--
Uladzislau Rezki

  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-19  9:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-17 10:59 [RESEND PATCH] dm-ebs: Mark full buffer dirty even on partial write Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2025-11-17 20:48 ` Mikulas Patocka
2025-11-18 11:39   ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-11-18 12:00     ` Mikulas Patocka
2025-11-18 12:40       ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-11-18 12:46         ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-18 14:15       ` Benjamin Marzinski
2025-11-18 17:21         ` Mikulas Patocka
2025-11-19  5:46           ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-19  8:43             ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-11-19  8:53               ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-19  8:57                 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-11-19  9:00                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-19  9:01                     ` Uladzislau Rezki [this message]
2025-11-19  9:05                       ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-19  9:13                         ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-11-19  9:17                           ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-19 17:26             ` Mikulas Patocka
2025-11-20  6:21               ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-20 12:08                 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-11-20 12:40                   ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-11-21  7:25                     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-21  7:24                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-21 13:21                     ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-11-21 16:48                       ` Benjamin Marzinski
2025-11-24 10:43                         ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-11-24 14:30                       ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-24 15:30                         ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-11-24 17:00                           ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-24 18:05                             ` Uladzislau Rezki
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-10-14 14:47 Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2025-10-16 19:59 ` Andrew Morton
2025-10-17 15:55   ` Uladzislau Rezki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aR2HZWE-v-umP7jI@pc636 \
    --to=urezki@gmail.com \
    --cc=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bmarzins@redhat.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox