From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4ABDB308F23; Thu, 20 Nov 2025 09:09:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.15 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763629783; cv=none; b=Q+4B+WA16zh7Nzdc+Sa0c4CHpitnN8wLymihtkdLnefkXpa1K3RoorUGfuUimB6f4GQPSR+yH0EZu8AIUXTHGiYuCcol+aY+47oz99LJ6qMWE/8jF8MukaSc5Rr7cXXCJNNkdnHJu6ID5kNUrdhJeGFDW9IakWkIH/eTPzUSyVs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763629783; c=relaxed/simple; bh=jhpOSf9tg/knjPkQ2TEUOAOiovrt4oNBJGUqRCHfAuI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=h/dnsMYCFVsmw+aBHAB6SLO6njf1VZKfWK2ZfYI3I5sY5I6o0g08aaLYbqqym9dslOHVju7YDthMK5XW6KURtdIG1AUwIvEtRA2VdxxtuXeWE8ruvU/Gb78hJt8zHyt5IGWUoD9v0DpIGazAhI1LmUH7+H8HhuptezZFCl6KPu4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=JIRU5AYy; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.15 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="JIRU5AYy" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1763629781; x=1795165781; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=jhpOSf9tg/knjPkQ2TEUOAOiovrt4oNBJGUqRCHfAuI=; b=JIRU5AYym4wxxYHi/Q1SZv9o1PCf7swQzWjgaz8oxrVQW/eEt0Q9S5Tx n6NR1nAku1YJsGPcA+zhWxZ4XmN8oZYEnLK9WBI8Xbomu8HOuCtIFoWqo MhB+hT0hZT3o6vcBOoofMRvlMVgtuMZ+vr0qCREYRV4IS64RAWQtEu5Gb NO4Bon+QqHwpmHnqJnJ9Vqzw0WBePGBzvkI+7TWC9HfrgoyYaxyBuIR4q q9Akl0T5V+NqE3/7tZEL3wwlUcCvO7KOx+PpAh0Y7EnA1YoYlL1cqW/rZ UfYMlvmaMWKrgGKHz6Wm3PeaHs+KwF97XQ338v1uZrYsee3PVwMYvI0HO g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: Zdjaci4xSLi3e5sIEMZMdA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: VUcPBrBrR3WjFaB3TG6X2w== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11618"; a="69309390" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.19,317,1754982000"; d="scan'208";a="69309390" Received: from orviesa007.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.147]) by orvoesa107.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Nov 2025 01:09:40 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 6i/j7LxmTumInCAFxz/tYg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 2+epo3/QTViAtPjtlsR9MQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.19,317,1754982000"; d="scan'208";a="191335867" Received: from amilburn-desk.amilburn-desk (HELO localhost) ([10.245.244.97]) by orviesa007-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Nov 2025 01:09:38 -0800 Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2025 11:09:35 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Francesco Lavra Cc: Lorenzo Bianconi , Jonathan Cameron , David Lechner , Nuno =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=E1?= , Andy Shevchenko , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] st_lsm6dsx: add tap event detection Message-ID: References: <20251120082615.3263892-1-flavra@baylibre.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251120082615.3263892-1-flavra@baylibre.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Thu, Nov 20, 2025 at 09:26:06AM +0100, Francesco Lavra wrote: > The bulk of this patch set consists of reworking the existing code for > event detection (which supports IIO_EV_TYPE_THRESH events only) in order to > make it generic to accommodate different event types. Actual support for > tap events is implemented in the last patch. > Tested on LSMDSV16X. Still one piece to get better, but overall looks good to me now, Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko (at least for the patches with no comments from me, and for the one more after addressing the comment) -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko