public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com>,
	Maciej Wieczor-Retman <maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com>,
	Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>,
	"Drew Fustini" <dfustini@baylibre.com>,
	Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>, Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>,
	<x86@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<patches@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 25/32] x86/resctrl: Handle number of RMIDs supported by RDT_RESOURCE_PERF_PKG
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2025 10:52:00 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aRtu0J4os4bXTLV2@agluck-desk3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cdbc23f6-cf4b-4e83-a037-0aaf7c076e8c@intel.com>

On Mon, Nov 17, 2025 at 09:31:41AM -0800, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> Hi Tony,
> 
> On 11/17/25 8:37 AM, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 03:26:42PM -0800, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> >> Hi Tony,
> >>
> >> On 11/14/25 1:55 PM, Luck, Tony wrote:
> >>>
> >>> resctrl: Feature energy guid=0x26696143 not enabled due to insufficient RMIDs
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> static bool enable_events(struct event_group *e, struct pmt_feature_group *p)
> >>> {
> >>> 	struct rdt_resource *r = &rdt_resources_all[RDT_RESOURCE_PERF_PKG].r_resctrl;
> >>> 	bool warn_disable = false;
> >>>
> >>> 	if (!group_has_usable_regions(e, p))
> >>> 		return false;
> >>>
> >>> 	/* Disable feature if insufficient RMIDs */
> >>> 	if (!all_regions_have_sufficient_rmid(e, p)) {
> >>> 		warn_disable = true;
> >>> 		rdt_set_feature_disabled(e->name);
> >>> 	}
> >>>
> >>> 	/* User can override above disable from kernel command line */
> >>> 	if (!rdt_is_feature_enabled(e->name)) {
> >>> 		if (warn_disable)
> >>> 			pr_info("Feature %s guid=0x%x not enabled due to insufficient RMIDs\n",
> >>> 				e->name, e->guid);
> >>> 		return false;
> >>> 	}
> >>> 	...
> >>> }
> >>
> >> Thank you for considering. This looks good to me.
> >>
> >> I now realize that if a system supports, for example, two energy guid and only one has insufficient
> >> RMID then one or both may be disabled by default depending on which resctrl attempts to enable
> >> first. This is arbitrary based on where the event group appears in the array.
> > 
> > intel_pmt_get_regions_by_feature() does return arrays of telemetry_region
> > with different guids today, but not currently for the "RMID" features.
> > So this could be a problem in the future.
> > 
> > I think I need to drop the "rdt=perf,!energy" command line control as
> > being too coarse. Instead add a new boot argument. E.g.
> > 
> > 	rdtguid=0x26696143,!0x26557651
> > 
> > to give the user control per-guid instead of per-pmt_feature_id. Users
> > can discover which guids are supported on a system by looking in
> > /sys/bus/auxiliary/devices/intel_vsec.discovery.*/intel_pmt/features*/per_rmid*
> > where there are "guids" and "num_rmids" files.
> 
> Should disable/enable be per RMID telemetry feature? I do not see anything preventing a system from
> using the same guid for different RMID telemetry features.
> 
> I think it will be useful to look at how other kernel parameters distinguish different
> categories of parameters so that resctrl can be consistent here. Looks like an underscore is
> most useful and also flexible since it allows both a dash and underscore to be used.
> 
> Another alternative that is common in kernel parameters is to use ":". For example, 
> 	rdt=energy:0x26696143
> 
> With something like above user can, for example, use just "energy" to disable all RMID energy
> telemetry or be specific to which guid should be disabled. This seems to fit well with existing
> rdt parameters and be quite flexible.

See rough patch at foot of this e-mail. It's just on top of my WIP v14,
but if it looks like the right direction I will merge it into the series
in the patch that adds the energy/perf options.

> > 
> >> How a system with two guid of the same feature type would work is not clear to me though. Looks
> >> like they cannot share events at all since an event is uniquely associated with a struct pmt_event
> >> that can belong to only one event group. If they may share events then enable_events()->resctrl_enable_mon_event()
> >> will complain loudly but still proceed and allow the event group to be enabled.
> > 
> > I can't see a good reason why the same event would be enabled under
> > different guids present on the same system. We can revisit my assumption
> > if the "Duplicate enable for event" message shows up.
> 
> This would be difficult to handle at that time, no? From what I can tell this would enable
> an unusable event group to actually be enabled resulting in untested and invalid flows.
> I think it will be safer to not enable an event group in this scenario and seems to math your
> expectation that this would be unexpected. The "Duplicate enable for event" message will still
> appear and we can still revisit those assumptions when they do, but the systems encountering
> them will not be running with enabled event groups that are not actually fully enabled.

There's a hardware cost to including an event in an aggregator.
Inclusing the same event in mutliple aggregators described by
different guids is really something that should never happen.
Just printing a warning and skipping the event seems an adequate
defense.
> 
> > 
> >> I think the resctrl_enable_mon_event() warnings were added to support enabling of new features
> >> so that the WARNs can catch issues during development ... now it may encounter issues when a
> >> kernel with this implementation is run on a system that supports a single feature with
> >> multiple guid. Do you have more insight in how the "single feature with multiple guid" may look to
> >> better prepare resctrl to handle them?
> >>
> >> Should "enable_events" be split so that a feature can be disabled for all its event groups if
> >> any of them cannot be enabled due to insufficient RMIDs?
> >> Perhaps resctrl_enable_mon_event() should also now return success/fail so that an event group
> >> cannot be enabled if its events cannot be enabled?
> >> Finally, a system with two guid of the same feature type will end up printing duplicate
> >> "<feature type> monitoring detected" that could be more descriptive?
> > 
> > I need to add the guid to that message.
> 
> Sounds good. Thank you.
> 
> Reinette

-Tony

---

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
index 08eb78acb988..25df1abc1537 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
@@ -241,6 +241,7 @@ int intel_aet_read_event(int domid, u32 rmid, void *arch_priv, u64 *val);
 void intel_aet_mon_domain_setup(int cpu, int id, struct rdt_resource *r,
 				struct list_head *add_pos);
 void intel_aet_add_debugfs(void);
+void intel_aet_option(bool force_off, const char *option, const char *suboption);
 #else
 static inline bool intel_aet_get_events(void) { return false; }
 static inline void __exit intel_aet_exit(void) { }
@@ -252,6 +253,7 @@ static inline int intel_aet_read_event(int domid, u32 rmid, void *arch_priv, u64
 static inline void intel_aet_mon_domain_setup(int cpu, int id, struct rdt_resource *r,
 					      struct list_head *add_pos) { }
 static inline void intel_aet_add_debugfs(void) { }
+static inline void intel_aet_option(bool force_off, const char *option, const char *suboption) { };
 #endif
 
 #endif /* _ASM_X86_RESCTRL_INTERNAL_H */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
index 5cae4119686e..68195f458c0b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
@@ -842,6 +842,7 @@ static struct rdt_options rdt_options[] = {
 static int __init set_rdt_options(char *str)
 {
 	struct rdt_options *o;
+	char *suboption;
 	bool force_off;
 	char *tok;
 
@@ -851,6 +852,11 @@ static int __init set_rdt_options(char *str)
 		force_off = *tok == '!';
 		if (force_off)
 			tok++;
+		suboption = strpbrk(tok, ":");
+		if (suboption) {
+			*suboption++ = '\0';
+			intel_aet_option(force_off, tok, suboption);
+		}
 		for (o = rdt_options; o < &rdt_options[NUM_RDT_OPTIONS]; o++) {
 			if (strcmp(tok, o->name) == 0) {
 				if (force_off)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/intel_aet.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/intel_aet.c
index 6028bfec229b..b3c61bcd3e8f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/intel_aet.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/intel_aet.c
@@ -69,6 +69,9 @@ struct pmt_event {
  *			data for all telemetry regions type @feature.
  *			Valid if the system supports the event group.
  *			NULL otherwise.
+ * @force_off:		Set true when "rdt" command line disables this @guid.
+ * @force_on:		Set true when "rdt" command line overrides disable of
+ *			this @guid due to insufficeint @num_rmid.
  * @guid:		Unique number per XML description file.
  * @num_rmid:		Number of RMIDs supported by this group. May be
  *			adjusted downwards if enumeration from
@@ -83,6 +86,7 @@ struct event_group {
 	enum pmt_feature_id		feature;
 	char				*name;
 	struct pmt_feature_group	*pfg;
+	bool				force_off, force_on;
 
 	/* Remaining fields initialized from XML file. */
 	u32				guid;
@@ -144,6 +148,26 @@ static struct event_group *known_event_groups[] = {
 	     _peg < &known_event_groups[ARRAY_SIZE(known_event_groups)];	\
 	     _peg++)
 
+void intel_aet_option(bool force_off, const char *option, const char *suboption)
+{
+	struct event_group **peg;
+	u32 guid;
+
+	if (kstrtou32(suboption, 16, &guid))
+		return;
+
+	for_each_event_group(peg) {
+		if (!strcmp(option, (*peg)->name))
+			continue;
+		if ((*peg)->guid != guid)
+			continue;
+		if (force_off)
+			(*peg)->force_off = true;
+		else
+			(*peg)->force_on = true;
+	}
+}
+
 /*
  * Clear the address field of regions that did not pass the checks in
  * skip_telem_region() so they will not be used by intel_aet_read_event().
@@ -252,6 +276,9 @@ static bool enable_events(struct event_group *e, struct pmt_feature_group *p)
 	struct rdt_resource *r = &rdt_resources_all[RDT_RESOURCE_PERF_PKG].r_resctrl;
 	bool warn_disable = false;
 
+	if (e->force_off)
+		return false;
+
 	if (!group_has_usable_regions(e, p))
 		return false;
 
@@ -262,7 +289,7 @@ static bool enable_events(struct event_group *e, struct pmt_feature_group *p)
 	}
 
 	/* User can override above disable from kernel command line */
-	if (!rdt_is_feature_enabled(e->name)) {
+	if (!rdt_is_feature_enabled(e->name) && !e->force_on) {
 		if (warn_disable)
 			pr_info("Feature %s guid=0x%x not enabled due to insufficient RMIDs\n",
 				e->name, e->guid);



  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-17 18:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 85+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-29 16:20 [PATCH v13 00/32] x86,fs/resctrl telemetry monitoring Tony Luck
2025-10-29 16:20 ` [PATCH v13 01/32] x86,fs/resctrl: Improve domain type checking Tony Luck
2025-10-29 16:20 ` [PATCH v13 02/32] x86/resctrl: Move L3 initialization into new helper function Tony Luck
2025-10-29 16:20 ` [PATCH v13 03/32] x86/resctrl: Refactor domain_remove_cpu_mon() ready for new domain types Tony Luck
2025-10-29 16:20 ` [PATCH v13 04/32] x86/resctrl: Clean up domain_remove_cpu_ctrl() Tony Luck
2025-10-29 16:20 ` [PATCH v13 05/32] x86,fs/resctrl: Refactor domain create/remove using struct rdt_domain_hdr Tony Luck
2025-11-12 19:18   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-10-29 16:20 ` [PATCH v13 06/32] fs/resctrl: Split L3 dependent parts out of __mon_event_count() Tony Luck
2025-10-29 16:20 ` [PATCH v13 07/32] x86,fs/resctrl: Use struct rdt_domain_hdr when reading counters Tony Luck
2025-11-12 19:19   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-10-29 16:20 ` [PATCH v13 08/32] x86,fs/resctrl: Rename struct rdt_mon_domain and rdt_hw_mon_domain Tony Luck
2025-11-13  4:01   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-10-29 16:20 ` [PATCH v13 09/32] x86,fs/resctrl: Rename some L3 specific functions Tony Luck
2025-11-13  4:01   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-10-29 16:20 ` [PATCH v13 10/32] fs/resctrl: Make event details accessible to functions when reading events Tony Luck
2025-10-29 16:20 ` [PATCH v13 11/32] x86,fs/resctrl: Handle events that can be read from any CPU Tony Luck
2025-10-30  6:14   ` Chen, Yu C
2025-10-30 15:54     ` Luck, Tony
2025-10-30 16:18       ` Chen, Yu C
2025-11-13  4:02   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-10-29 16:20 ` [PATCH v13 12/32] x86,fs/resctrl: Support binary fixed point event counters Tony Luck
2025-11-05 14:42   ` Dave Martin
2025-11-05 23:31     ` Luck, Tony
2025-11-06  0:09       ` Reinette Chatre
2025-11-11 17:22         ` Dave Martin
2025-11-12 16:12           ` Reinette Chatre
2025-11-06  2:27       ` Luck, Tony
2025-11-11 17:31         ` Dave Martin
2025-11-14 18:39           ` Luck, Tony
2025-11-11 17:16       ` Dave Martin
2025-11-14 18:51         ` Luck, Tony
2025-11-10 16:52     ` Luck, Tony
2025-11-11 17:34       ` Dave Martin
2025-11-12 13:08   ` David Laight
2025-10-29 16:20 ` [PATCH v13 13/32] x86,fs/resctrl: Add an architectural hook called for each mount Tony Luck
2025-10-29 16:20 ` [PATCH v13 14/32] x86,fs/resctrl: Add and initialize rdt_resource for package scope monitor Tony Luck
2025-11-13  4:04   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-10-29 16:20 ` [PATCH v13 15/32] fs/resctrl: Cleanup as L3 is no longer the only monitor resource Tony Luck
2025-11-13  4:05   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-10-29 16:20 ` [PATCH v13 16/32] x86/resctrl: Discover hardware telemetry events Tony Luck
2025-11-13  4:11   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-10-29 16:21 ` [PATCH v13 17/32] x86,fs/resctrl: Fill in details of events for guid 0x26696143 and 0x26557651 Tony Luck
2025-11-13 22:38   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-10-29 16:21 ` [PATCH v13 18/32] x86,fs/resctrl: Add architectural event pointer Tony Luck
2025-10-29 16:21 ` [PATCH v13 19/32] x86/resctrl: Find and enable usable telemetry events Tony Luck
2025-11-13 22:46   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-10-29 16:21 ` [PATCH v13 20/32] x86/resctrl: Read " Tony Luck
2025-11-13 22:47   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-10-29 16:21 ` [PATCH v13 21/32] fs/resctrl: Refactor mkdir_mondata_subdir() Tony Luck
2025-11-13 22:48   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-10-29 16:21 ` [PATCH v13 22/32] fs/resctrl: Refactor rmdir_mondata_subdir_allrdtgrp() Tony Luck
2025-11-13 22:48   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-10-29 16:21 ` [PATCH v13 23/32] x86,fs/resctrl: Handle domain creation/deletion for RDT_RESOURCE_PERF_PKG Tony Luck
2025-10-29 16:21 ` [PATCH v13 24/32] x86/resctrl: Add energy/perf choices to rdt boot option Tony Luck
2025-10-29 16:21 ` [PATCH v13 25/32] x86/resctrl: Handle number of RMIDs supported by RDT_RESOURCE_PERF_PKG Tony Luck
2025-11-13 22:51   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-11-14 21:55     ` Luck, Tony
2025-11-14 23:26       ` Reinette Chatre
2025-11-17 16:37         ` Luck, Tony
2025-11-17 17:31           ` Reinette Chatre
2025-11-17 18:52             ` Luck, Tony [this message]
2025-11-18 16:48               ` Reinette Chatre
2025-11-18 17:35                 ` Luck, Tony
2025-11-18 18:11                   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-10-29 16:21 ` [PATCH v13 26/32] fs/resctrl: Move allocation/free of closid_num_dirty_rmid[] Tony Luck
2025-11-13 22:51   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-10-29 16:21 ` [PATCH v13 27/32] x86,fs/resctrl: Compute number of RMIDs as minimum across resources Tony Luck
2025-10-29 16:21 ` [PATCH v13 28/32] fs/resctrl: Move RMID initialization to first mount Tony Luck
2025-10-29 16:21 ` [PATCH v13 29/32] x86/resctrl: Enable RDT_RESOURCE_PERF_PKG Tony Luck
2025-11-13 22:52   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-10-29 16:21 ` [PATCH v13 30/32] fs/resctrl: Provide interface to create architecture specific debugfs area Tony Luck
2025-10-29 16:21 ` [PATCH v13 31/32] x86/resctrl: Add debugfs files to show telemetry aggregator status Tony Luck
2025-11-13 22:53   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-10-29 16:21 ` [PATCH v13 32/32] x86,fs/resctrl: Update documentation for telemetry events Tony Luck
2025-11-13 22:56   ` Reinette Chatre
2025-10-29 18:59 ` [PATCH v13 00/32] x86,fs/resctrl telemetry monitoring Luck, Tony
2025-11-05 15:33   ` Moger, Babu
2025-11-05 15:41     ` Luck, Tony
2025-12-17  0:28     ` Luck, Tony
2025-12-17 16:44       ` Moger, Babu
2025-12-17 17:08         ` Luck, Tony
2025-11-16 17:35 ` Drew Fustini
2025-11-17 16:52   ` Luck, Tony
2025-11-18 23:03     ` Drew Fustini
2025-11-18 23:12       ` Luck, Tony

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aRtu0J4os4bXTLV2@agluck-desk3 \
    --to=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
    --cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
    --cc=dfustini@baylibre.com \
    --cc=fenghuay@nvidia.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com \
    --cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=peternewman@google.com \
    --cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox