public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>,
	Stefani Seibold <stefani@seibold.net>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 11/27] ublk: handle UBLK_U_IO_COMMIT_IO_CMDS
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 18:25:50 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aS1tLp7tBi8K_NWk@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADUfDZqtoN=Xv17txG5cZ9foD3ToxgiiW_DSgnABG2ocK7p-UQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, Nov 30, 2025 at 08:39:49AM -0800, Caleb Sander Mateos wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2025 at 5:59 PM Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Handle UBLK_U_IO_COMMIT_IO_CMDS by walking the uring_cmd fixed buffer:
> >
> > - read each element into one temp buffer in batch style
> >
> > - parse and apply each element for committing io result
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/block/ublk_drv.c      | 117 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> >  include/uapi/linux/ublk_cmd.h |   8 +++
> >  2 files changed, 121 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> > index 66c77daae955..ea992366af5b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> > +++ b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> > @@ -2098,9 +2098,9 @@ static inline int ublk_set_auto_buf_reg(struct ublk_io *io, struct io_uring_cmd
> >         return 0;
> >  }
> >
> > -static int ublk_handle_auto_buf_reg(struct ublk_io *io,
> > -                                   struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
> > -                                   u16 *buf_idx)
> > +static void __ublk_handle_auto_buf_reg(struct ublk_io *io,
> > +                                      struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
> > +                                      u16 *buf_idx)
> 
> The name could be a bit more descriptive. How about "ublk_clear_auto_buf_reg()"?

Looks fine.

> 
> >  {
> >         if (io->flags & UBLK_IO_FLAG_AUTO_BUF_REG) {
> >                 io->flags &= ~UBLK_IO_FLAG_AUTO_BUF_REG;
> > @@ -2118,7 +2118,13 @@ static int ublk_handle_auto_buf_reg(struct ublk_io *io,
> >                 if (io->buf_ctx_handle == io_uring_cmd_ctx_handle(cmd))
> >                         *buf_idx = io->buf.auto_reg.index;
> >         }
> > +}
> >
> > +static int ublk_handle_auto_buf_reg(struct ublk_io *io,
> > +                                   struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
> > +                                   u16 *buf_idx)
> > +{
> > +       __ublk_handle_auto_buf_reg(io, cmd, buf_idx);
> >         return ublk_set_auto_buf_reg(io, cmd);
> >  }
> >
> > @@ -2553,6 +2559,17 @@ static inline __u64 ublk_batch_buf_addr(const struct ublk_batch_io *uc,
> >         return 0;
> >  }
> >
> > +static inline __u64 ublk_batch_zone_lba(const struct ublk_batch_io *uc,
> > +                                       const struct ublk_elem_header *elem)
> > +{
> > +       const void *buf = (const void *)elem;
> 
> Unnecessary cast

OK

> 
> > +
> > +       if (uc->flags & UBLK_BATCH_F_HAS_ZONE_LBA)
> > +               return *(__u64 *)(buf + sizeof(*elem) +
> > +                               8 * !!(uc->flags & UBLK_BATCH_F_HAS_BUF_ADDR));
> 
> Cast to a const pointer?

OK, but I feel it isn't necessary.

> 
> 
> > +       return -1;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static struct ublk_auto_buf_reg
> >  ublk_batch_auto_buf_reg(const struct ublk_batch_io *uc,
> >                         const struct ublk_elem_header *elem)
> > @@ -2708,6 +2725,98 @@ static int ublk_handle_batch_prep_cmd(const struct ublk_batch_io_data *data)
> >         return ret;
> >  }
> >
> > +static int ublk_batch_commit_io_check(const struct ublk_queue *ubq,
> > +                                     struct ublk_io *io,
> > +                                     union ublk_io_buf *buf)
> > +{
> > +       struct request *req = io->req;
> > +
> > +       if (!req)
> > +               return -EINVAL;
> 
> This check seems redundant with the UBLK_IO_FLAG_OWNED_BY_SRV check?

I'd keep the check, which has document benefit, or warn_on()?

> 
> > +
> > +       if (io->flags & UBLK_IO_FLAG_ACTIVE)
> > +               return -EBUSY;
> 
> Aren't UBLK_IO_FLAG_ACTIVE and UBLK_IO_FLAG_OWNED_BY_SRV mutually
> exclusive? Then this check is also redundant with the
> UBLK_IO_FLAG_OWNED_BY_SRV check.

OK.

> 
> > +
> > +       if (!(io->flags & UBLK_IO_FLAG_OWNED_BY_SRV))
> > +               return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +       if (ublk_need_map_io(ubq)) {
> > +               /*
> > +                * COMMIT_AND_FETCH_REQ has to provide IO buffer if
> > +                * NEED GET DATA is not enabled or it is Read IO.
> > +                */
> > +               if (!buf->addr && (!ublk_need_get_data(ubq) ||
> > +                                       req_op(req) == REQ_OP_READ))
> > +                       return -EINVAL;
> > +       }
> > +       return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int ublk_batch_commit_io(struct ublk_queue *ubq,
> > +                               const struct ublk_batch_io_data *data,
> > +                               const struct ublk_elem_header *elem)
> > +{
> > +       struct ublk_io *io = &ubq->ios[elem->tag];
> > +       const struct ublk_batch_io *uc = &data->header;
> > +       u16 buf_idx = UBLK_INVALID_BUF_IDX;
> > +       union ublk_io_buf buf = { 0 };
> > +       struct request *req = NULL;
> > +       bool auto_reg = false;
> > +       bool compl = false;
> > +       int ret;
> > +
> > +       if (ublk_dev_support_auto_buf_reg(data->ub)) {
> > +               buf.auto_reg = ublk_batch_auto_buf_reg(uc, elem);
> > +               auto_reg = true;
> > +       } else if (ublk_dev_need_map_io(data->ub))
> > +               buf.addr = ublk_batch_buf_addr(uc, elem);
> > +
> > +       ublk_io_lock(io);
> > +       ret = ublk_batch_commit_io_check(ubq, io, &buf);
> > +       if (!ret) {
> > +               io->res = elem->result;
> > +               io->buf = buf;
> > +               req = ublk_fill_io_cmd(io, data->cmd);
> > +
> > +               if (auto_reg)
> > +                       __ublk_handle_auto_buf_reg(io, data->cmd, &buf_idx);
> > +               compl = ublk_need_complete_req(data->ub, io);
> > +       }
> > +       ublk_io_unlock(io);
> > +
> > +       if (unlikely(ret)) {
> > +               pr_warn("%s: dev %u queue %u io %u: commit failure %d\n",
> > +                       __func__, data->ub->dev_info.dev_id, ubq->q_id,
> > +                       elem->tag, ret);
> 
> This warning can be triggered by userspace. It should probably be
> rate-limited or changed to pr_devel().

Looks fine.



Thanks, 
Ming


  reply	other threads:[~2025-12-01 10:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-21  1:58 [PATCH V4 00/27] ublk: add UBLK_F_BATCH_IO Ming Lei
2025-11-21  1:58 ` [PATCH V4 01/27] kfifo: add kfifo_alloc_node() helper for NUMA awareness Ming Lei
2025-11-29 19:12   ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-01  1:46     ` Ming Lei
2025-12-01  5:58       ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-11-21  1:58 ` [PATCH V4 02/27] ublk: add parameter `struct io_uring_cmd *` to ublk_prep_auto_buf_reg() Ming Lei
2025-11-21  1:58 ` [PATCH V4 03/27] ublk: add `union ublk_io_buf` with improved naming Ming Lei
2025-11-21  1:58 ` [PATCH V4 04/27] ublk: refactor auto buffer register in ublk_dispatch_req() Ming Lei
2025-11-21  1:58 ` [PATCH V4 05/27] ublk: pass const pointer to ublk_queue_is_zoned() Ming Lei
2025-11-21  1:58 ` [PATCH V4 06/27] ublk: add helper of __ublk_fetch() Ming Lei
2025-11-21  1:58 ` [PATCH V4 07/27] ublk: define ublk_ch_batch_io_fops for the coming feature F_BATCH_IO Ming Lei
2025-11-21  1:58 ` [PATCH V4 08/27] ublk: prepare for not tracking task context for command batch Ming Lei
2025-11-21  1:58 ` [PATCH V4 09/27] ublk: add new batch command UBLK_U_IO_PREP_IO_CMDS & UBLK_U_IO_COMMIT_IO_CMDS Ming Lei
2025-11-29 19:19   ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-11-21  1:58 ` [PATCH V4 10/27] ublk: handle UBLK_U_IO_PREP_IO_CMDS Ming Lei
2025-11-29 19:47   ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-11-30 19:25   ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-11-21  1:58 ` [PATCH V4 11/27] ublk: handle UBLK_U_IO_COMMIT_IO_CMDS Ming Lei
2025-11-30 16:39   ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-01 10:25     ` Ming Lei [this message]
2025-12-01 16:43       ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-11-21  1:58 ` [PATCH V4 12/27] ublk: add io events fifo structure Ming Lei
2025-11-30 16:53   ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-01  3:04     ` Ming Lei
2025-11-21  1:58 ` [PATCH V4 13/27] ublk: add batch I/O dispatch infrastructure Ming Lei
2025-11-30 19:24   ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-11-30 21:37     ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-01  2:32     ` Ming Lei
2025-12-01 17:37       ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-11-21  1:58 ` [PATCH V4 14/27] ublk: add UBLK_U_IO_FETCH_IO_CMDS for batch I/O processing Ming Lei
2025-12-01  5:55   ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-01  9:41     ` Ming Lei
2025-12-01 17:51       ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-02  1:27         ` Ming Lei
2025-12-02  1:39           ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-02  8:14             ` Ming Lei
2025-12-02 15:20               ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-11-21  1:58 ` [PATCH V4 15/27] ublk: abort requests filled in event kfifo Ming Lei
2025-12-01 18:52   ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-02  1:29     ` Ming Lei
2025-12-01 19:00   ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-11-21  1:58 ` [PATCH V4 16/27] ublk: add new feature UBLK_F_BATCH_IO Ming Lei
2025-12-01 21:16   ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-02  1:44     ` Ming Lei
2025-12-02 16:05       ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-03  2:21         ` Ming Lei
2025-11-21  1:58 ` [PATCH V4 17/27] ublk: document " Ming Lei
2025-12-01 21:46   ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-02  1:55     ` Ming Lei
2025-12-02  2:03     ` Ming Lei
2025-11-21  1:58 ` [PATCH V4 18/27] ublk: implement batch request completion via blk_mq_end_request_batch() Ming Lei
2025-12-01 21:55   ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-11-21  1:58 ` [PATCH V4 19/27] selftests: ublk: fix user_data truncation for tgt_data >= 256 Ming Lei
2025-11-21  1:58 ` [PATCH V4 20/27] selftests: ublk: replace assert() with ublk_assert() Ming Lei
2025-11-21  1:58 ` [PATCH V4 21/27] selftests: ublk: add ublk_io_buf_idx() for returning io buffer index Ming Lei
2025-11-21  1:58 ` [PATCH V4 22/27] selftests: ublk: add batch buffer management infrastructure Ming Lei
2025-11-21  1:58 ` [PATCH V4 23/27] selftests: ublk: handle UBLK_U_IO_PREP_IO_CMDS Ming Lei
2025-11-21  1:58 ` [PATCH V4 24/27] selftests: ublk: handle UBLK_U_IO_COMMIT_IO_CMDS Ming Lei
2025-11-21  1:58 ` [PATCH V4 25/27] selftests: ublk: handle UBLK_U_IO_FETCH_IO_CMDS Ming Lei
2025-11-21  1:58 ` [PATCH V4 26/27] selftests: ublk: add --batch/-b for enabling F_BATCH_IO Ming Lei
2025-11-21  1:58 ` [PATCH V4 27/27] selftests: ublk: support arbitrary threads/queues combination Ming Lei
2025-11-28 11:59 ` [PATCH V4 00/27] ublk: add UBLK_F_BATCH_IO Ming Lei
2025-11-28 16:19   ` Jens Axboe
2025-11-28 19:07     ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-11-29  1:24       ` Ming Lei
2025-11-28 16:22 ` (subset) " Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aS1tLp7tBi8K_NWk@fedora \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=csander@purestorage.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stefani@seibold.net \
    --cc=ushankar@purestorage.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox