From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BB9024BBEE for ; Tue, 2 Dec 2025 15:15:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1764688539; cv=none; b=GP9FQb8MCwjcJECZdAQlhB2TRJ19ExqpJEe7emOKFTBHABlEkUazSr1wLzHNuC2FCRpmoLZQNq9+KVmlhQI+0wyC0MxHzJrNh/UQQUNDxDNYA8UdeXEUDN9kN8w1wrGrGKpXpi8pW3K3nPYDyV9rLXsUDhyJmyDylaN+wmge4uw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1764688539; c=relaxed/simple; bh=eWwJzGulT1Oe5X9Ix9TogMmOQSnHmW4c62SkF/UCweY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=SC2W7gtaiMi9RFDb19+CDeSym2XOwncELpU+hle5QFJ3FsYK7nizWGyXPLWdkmrlHAXqu+dfT44ABVNp5KRJAVXORrVDWihLN0upKbvbcdrcpJD+AnO+6KU0+SVlTMT8urIAjUCJFr4O4j5LpvhSp6HGAejWn7uZ8JJlUswXEPM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=PkFtR2PD; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="PkFtR2PD" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 19AB1C4CEF1; Tue, 2 Dec 2025 15:15:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1764688538; bh=eWwJzGulT1Oe5X9Ix9TogMmOQSnHmW4c62SkF/UCweY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=PkFtR2PDQ5J5/MDzu65SJmrip0xR+xNbEeScKup7Z5hn+FG9el6nJksPLuQJpsEsX kVWhezIb3ZTC9W9W98+eeponk/zVkLh+D6wNAikdmQVi6+STB3FOO0Nw1UrfEPoZ+U pe2TYeftNJtJpSMBm+jDCYqLkJx2drLgufSy5hbfvM+bjbaUeYMHcktsBug8Tce8kV qqe6FrQW13oLlCUBpfWQbWhmyDjyDZn8eV99+VqhVVvZPTSTWVbryZDpnCdObaGL9g k42kF/4aAiMA6bw/dzFyw+3jJ/qvTdKr6nMXqvBWg3Cleaf4EW/8uhEXnl7D3QollN uYCWfhkA2hLNA== Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 16:15:33 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Juri Lelli , Dietmar Eggemann , Valentin Schneider , Vincent Guittot , Shrikanth Hegde , Linus Torvalds , Mel Gorman , Steven Rostedt , Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] sched/fair: Rename avg_vruntime() to cfs_avg_vruntime() Message-ID: References: <20251201064647.1851919-1-mingo@kernel.org> <20251201064647.1851919-5-mingo@kernel.org> <20251202102435.GA2556898@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251202102435.GA2556898@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> * Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, Dec 01, 2025 at 07:46:45AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > Since the unit of the ->avg_vruntime field isn't actually > > the same thing as the avg_vruntime() result, reduce confusion > > and rename the latter to the common cfs_*() nomenclature of > > visible global functions of the fair scheduler. > > But you're going to rename both those fields into sum_weight and > sum_w_vruntime freeing up the avg_vruntime name and clearing up the > above confusion. Ah, indeed and agreed - I dropped this patch. Thanks, Ingo