* Re: [PATCH 1/1 -v2] sched/fair: Sort out 'blocked_load*' namespace noise
2025-12-02 9:34 ` [PATCH 1/1 -v2] sched/fair: Sort out 'blocked_load*' namespace noise Ingo Molnar
@ 2025-12-02 10:13 ` Vincent Guittot
2025-12-02 16:09 ` [PATCH 1/1 -v3] " Ingo Molnar
2025-12-14 7:46 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2025-12-15 7:59 ` tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Vincent Guittot @ 2025-12-02 10:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ingo Molnar
Cc: linux-kernel, Peter Zijlstra, Frederic Weisbecker,
Shrikanth Hegde, Juri Lelli, Dietmar Eggemann, Valentin Schneider,
Linus Torvalds, Mel Gorman, Steven Rostedt, Thomas Gleixner
On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 at 10:35, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
>
>
> * Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 at 09:13, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > There's three separate, independent pieces of logic in the
> > > scheduler that are named 'has_blocked':
> > >
> > > 1) nohz.has_blocked,
> > > 2) rq->has_blocked_load - both of these relate to NOHZ balancing,
> > >
> > > 3) and cfs_rq_has_blocked(), which operates on SMP load-balancing
> > > averages.
> > >
> > > While reviewing this code I noticed a couple of inconsistencies:
> > >
> > > - nohz.has_blocked sometimes gets handled via a local variable
> > > that is named 'has_blocked_load' - but it's the runqueue
> > > that has the has_blocked_load field, not the nohz structure ...
> > >
> > > - The cfs_rq_has_blocked() function does SMP load-balancing and
> > > has no relation to NOHZ has_blocked logic.
> > >
> > > - The update_blocked_load_status() function, which sets the
> > > rq->has_blocked_load field, has a parameter named 'has_blocked',
> > > but that's the field name of the nohz structure.
> > >
> > > To sort all of this out, standardize on 3 distinct patterns:
> > >
> > > (1) nohz.has_blocked related functions and variables use the
> > > 'has_blocked' nomenclature,
> > >
> > > (2) rq->has_blocked_load related functions and variables use
> > > 'has_blocked_load',
> > >
> > > (3) and cfs_rq_has_blocked() uses 'has_blocked_load_avg'.
> >
> > They are all implementing the same feature: update the blocked pelt
> > signal of idle rqs.
>
> Yeah, should have said 3 separate layers of logic that
> each deal with the same thing, when writing the
> changelog I missed how update_blocked_load_status()
> feeds into rq->has_blocked_load via !done PELT signal
> we get back from the load-balancers and didn't look
> further. :-/
>
> > If we want some renaming, we should use the same naming for all to
> > show that it's all about the same thing
> >
> > nohz.has_blocked_load()
> > cfs_rq_has_blocked_load()
> > rq->has_blocked_load()
>
> I'd still argue that greppability of the 3 layers might
> have a small code readability value:
>
> git grep 'has_blocked\>' kernel/sched/
> git grep 'has_blocked_load\>' kernel/sched/
> git grep 'has_blocked_load_avg\>' kernel/sched/
>
> ... and I've fixed up the changelogs to say:
>
> There's three separate layers of logic in the scheduler that
> deal with 'has_blocked' handling of the NOHZ code:
>
> (1) nohz.has_blocked,
> (2) rq->has_blocked_load, deal with NOHZ idle balancing,
> (3) and cfs_rq_has_blocked(), which is part of the layer
> that is passing the SMP load-balancing signal to the
> NOHZ layers.
>
> To make it easier to separate them, split these 3 shared-mixed
> uses of 'has_blocked' name patterns into 3 distinct and greppable
> patterns:
>
> (1) nohz.has_blocked related functions and variables use
> 'has_blocked',
>
> (2) rq->has_blocked_load related functions and variables use
> 'has_blocked_load',
>
> (3) and cfs_rq_has_blocked() uses 'has_blocked_load_avg'.
>
> ... but if you still object to that notion, we can also
> do your suggestion - see the patch below. Both variants
> are fine to me, no strong preferences, as long as the
> names remove the existing random noise. :-)
>
> In fact, on a second thought, I slightly prefer your
> suggestion, as 'has_blocked_load' has a proper noun.
I would prefer using 'has_blocked_load' as I find it easier to get
that it's the same info saved in different places
Thanks
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ingo
>
> ========================>
> From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> Subject: sched/fair: Sort out 'blocked_load*' namespace noise
>
> There's three layers of logic in the scheduler that
> deal with 'has_blocked' (load) handling of the NOHZ code:
>
> (1) nohz.has_blocked,
> (2) rq->has_blocked_load, deal with NOHZ idle balancing,
> (3) and cfs_rq_has_blocked(), which is part of the layer
> that is passing the SMP load-balancing signal to the
> NOHZ layers.
>
> The 'has_blocked' and 'has_blocked_load' names are used
> in a mixed fashion, sometimes within the same function.
>
> Standardize on 'has_blocked_load' to make it all easy
> to read and easy to grep.
>
> No change in functionality.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
>
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index ff647e92a314..c6d3d01945bb 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -7137,7 +7137,7 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(cpumask_var_t, should_we_balance_tmpmask);
> static struct {
> cpumask_var_t idle_cpus_mask;
> atomic_t nr_cpus;
> - int has_blocked; /* Idle CPUS has blocked load */
> + int has_blocked_load; /* Idle CPUS has blocked load */
> int needs_update; /* Newly idle CPUs need their next_balance collated */
> unsigned long next_balance; /* in jiffy units */
> unsigned long next_blocked; /* Next update of blocked load in jiffies */
> @@ -9767,7 +9767,7 @@ static void attach_tasks(struct lb_env *env)
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON
> -static inline bool cfs_rq_has_blocked(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
> +static inline bool cfs_rq_has_blocked_load(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
> {
> if (cfs_rq->avg.load_avg)
> return true;
> @@ -9800,16 +9800,16 @@ static inline void update_blocked_load_tick(struct rq *rq)
> WRITE_ONCE(rq->last_blocked_load_update_tick, jiffies);
> }
>
> -static inline void update_blocked_load_status(struct rq *rq, bool has_blocked)
> +static inline void update_blocked_load_status(struct rq *rq, bool has_blocked_load)
> {
> - if (!has_blocked)
> + if (!has_blocked_load)
> rq->has_blocked_load = 0;
> }
> #else /* !CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON: */
> -static inline bool cfs_rq_has_blocked(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) { return false; }
> +static inline bool cfs_rq_has_blocked_load(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) { return false; }
> static inline bool others_have_blocked(struct rq *rq) { return false; }
> static inline void update_blocked_load_tick(struct rq *rq) {}
> -static inline void update_blocked_load_status(struct rq *rq, bool has_blocked) {}
> +static inline void update_blocked_load_status(struct rq *rq, bool has_blocked_load) {}
> #endif /* !CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON */
>
> static bool __update_blocked_others(struct rq *rq, bool *done)
> @@ -9866,7 +9866,7 @@ static bool __update_blocked_fair(struct rq *rq, bool *done)
> list_del_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
>
> /* Don't need periodic decay once load/util_avg are null */
> - if (cfs_rq_has_blocked(cfs_rq))
> + if (cfs_rq_has_blocked_load(cfs_rq))
> *done = false;
> }
>
> @@ -9926,7 +9926,7 @@ static bool __update_blocked_fair(struct rq *rq, bool *done)
> bool decayed;
>
> decayed = update_cfs_rq_load_avg(cfs_rq_clock_pelt(cfs_rq), cfs_rq);
> - if (cfs_rq_has_blocked(cfs_rq))
> + if (cfs_rq_has_blocked_load(cfs_rq))
> *done = false;
>
> return decayed;
> @@ -12443,7 +12443,7 @@ static void nohz_balancer_kick(struct rq *rq)
> if (likely(!atomic_read(&nohz.nr_cpus)))
> return;
>
> - if (READ_ONCE(nohz.has_blocked) &&
> + if (READ_ONCE(nohz.has_blocked_load) &&
> time_after(now, READ_ONCE(nohz.next_blocked)))
> flags = NOHZ_STATS_KICK;
>
> @@ -12604,9 +12604,9 @@ void nohz_balance_enter_idle(int cpu)
>
> /*
> * The tick is still stopped but load could have been added in the
> - * meantime. We set the nohz.has_blocked flag to trig a check of the
> + * meantime. We set the nohz.has_blocked_load flag to trig a check of the
> * *_avg. The CPU is already part of nohz.idle_cpus_mask so the clear
> - * of nohz.has_blocked can only happen after checking the new load
> + * of nohz.has_blocked_load can only happen after checking the new load
> */
> if (rq->nohz_tick_stopped)
> goto out;
> @@ -12622,7 +12622,7 @@ void nohz_balance_enter_idle(int cpu)
>
> /*
> * Ensures that if nohz_idle_balance() fails to observe our
> - * @idle_cpus_mask store, it must observe the @has_blocked
> + * @idle_cpus_mask store, it must observe the @has_blocked_load
> * and @needs_update stores.
> */
> smp_mb__after_atomic();
> @@ -12635,7 +12635,7 @@ void nohz_balance_enter_idle(int cpu)
> * Each time a cpu enter idle, we assume that it has blocked load and
> * enable the periodic update of the load of idle CPUs
> */
> - WRITE_ONCE(nohz.has_blocked, 1);
> + WRITE_ONCE(nohz.has_blocked_load, 1);
> }
>
> static bool update_nohz_stats(struct rq *rq)
> @@ -12676,8 +12676,8 @@ static void _nohz_idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, unsigned int flags)
>
> /*
> * We assume there will be no idle load after this update and clear
> - * the has_blocked flag. If a cpu enters idle in the mean time, it will
> - * set the has_blocked flag and trigger another update of idle load.
> + * the has_blocked_load flag. If a cpu enters idle in the mean time, it will
> + * set the has_blocked_load flag and trigger another update of idle load.
> * Because a cpu that becomes idle, is added to idle_cpus_mask before
> * setting the flag, we are sure to not clear the state and not
> * check the load of an idle cpu.
> @@ -12685,12 +12685,12 @@ static void _nohz_idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, unsigned int flags)
> * Same applies to idle_cpus_mask vs needs_update.
> */
> if (flags & NOHZ_STATS_KICK)
> - WRITE_ONCE(nohz.has_blocked, 0);
> + WRITE_ONCE(nohz.has_blocked_load, 0);
> if (flags & NOHZ_NEXT_KICK)
> WRITE_ONCE(nohz.needs_update, 0);
>
> /*
> - * Ensures that if we miss the CPU, we must see the has_blocked
> + * Ensures that if we miss the CPU, we must see the has_blocked_load
> * store from nohz_balance_enter_idle().
> */
> smp_mb();
> @@ -12757,7 +12757,7 @@ static void _nohz_idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, unsigned int flags)
> abort:
> /* There is still blocked load, enable periodic update */
> if (has_blocked_load)
> - WRITE_ONCE(nohz.has_blocked, 1);
> + WRITE_ONCE(nohz.has_blocked_load, 1);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -12819,7 +12819,7 @@ static void nohz_newidle_balance(struct rq *this_rq)
> return;
>
> /* Don't need to update blocked load of idle CPUs*/
> - if (!READ_ONCE(nohz.has_blocked) ||
> + if (!READ_ONCE(nohz.has_blocked_load) ||
> time_before(jiffies, READ_ONCE(nohz.next_blocked)))
> return;
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [PATCH 1/1 -v3] sched/fair: Sort out 'blocked_load*' namespace noise
2025-12-02 10:13 ` Vincent Guittot
@ 2025-12-02 16:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-12-02 16:55 ` Vincent Guittot
2025-12-02 20:26 ` Shrikanth Hegde
0 siblings, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2025-12-02 16:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vincent Guittot
Cc: linux-kernel, Peter Zijlstra, Frederic Weisbecker,
Shrikanth Hegde, Juri Lelli, Dietmar Eggemann, Valentin Schneider,
Linus Torvalds, Mel Gorman, Steven Rostedt, Thomas Gleixner
* Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 at 10:35, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> > * Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 at 09:13, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > There's three separate, independent pieces of logic in the
> > > > scheduler that are named 'has_blocked':
> > > >
> > > > 1) nohz.has_blocked,
> > > > 2) rq->has_blocked_load - both of these relate to NOHZ balancing,
> > > >
> > > > 3) and cfs_rq_has_blocked(), which operates on SMP load-balancing
> > > > averages.
> > > >
> > > > While reviewing this code I noticed a couple of inconsistencies:
> > > >
> > > > - nohz.has_blocked sometimes gets handled via a local variable
> > > > that is named 'has_blocked_load' - but it's the runqueue
> > > > that has the has_blocked_load field, not the nohz structure ...
> > > >
> > > > - The cfs_rq_has_blocked() function does SMP load-balancing and
> > > > has no relation to NOHZ has_blocked logic.
> > > >
> > > > - The update_blocked_load_status() function, which sets the
> > > > rq->has_blocked_load field, has a parameter named 'has_blocked',
> > > > but that's the field name of the nohz structure.
> > > >
> > > > To sort all of this out, standardize on 3 distinct patterns:
> > > >
> > > > (1) nohz.has_blocked related functions and variables use the
> > > > 'has_blocked' nomenclature,
> > > >
> > > > (2) rq->has_blocked_load related functions and variables use
> > > > 'has_blocked_load',
> > > >
> > > > (3) and cfs_rq_has_blocked() uses 'has_blocked_load_avg'.
> > >
> > > They are all implementing the same feature: update the blocked pelt
> > > signal of idle rqs.
> >
> > Yeah, should have said 3 separate layers of logic that
> > each deal with the same thing, when writing the
> > changelog I missed how update_blocked_load_status()
> > feeds into rq->has_blocked_load via !done PELT signal
> > we get back from the load-balancers and didn't look
> > further. :-/
> >
> > > If we want some renaming, we should use the same naming for all to
> > > show that it's all about the same thing
> > >
> > > nohz.has_blocked_load()
> > > cfs_rq_has_blocked_load()
> > > rq->has_blocked_load()
> >
> > I'd still argue that greppability of the 3 layers might
> > have a small code readability value:
> >
> > git grep 'has_blocked\>' kernel/sched/
> > git grep 'has_blocked_load\>' kernel/sched/
> > git grep 'has_blocked_load_avg\>' kernel/sched/
> >
> > ... and I've fixed up the changelogs to say:
> >
> > There's three separate layers of logic in the scheduler that
> > deal with 'has_blocked' handling of the NOHZ code:
> >
> > (1) nohz.has_blocked,
> > (2) rq->has_blocked_load, deal with NOHZ idle balancing,
> > (3) and cfs_rq_has_blocked(), which is part of the layer
> > that is passing the SMP load-balancing signal to the
> > NOHZ layers.
> >
> > To make it easier to separate them, split these 3 shared-mixed
> > uses of 'has_blocked' name patterns into 3 distinct and greppable
> > patterns:
> >
> > (1) nohz.has_blocked related functions and variables use
> > 'has_blocked',
> >
> > (2) rq->has_blocked_load related functions and variables use
> > 'has_blocked_load',
> >
> > (3) and cfs_rq_has_blocked() uses 'has_blocked_load_avg'.
> >
> > ... but if you still object to that notion, we can also
> > do your suggestion - see the patch below. Both variants
> > are fine to me, no strong preferences, as long as the
> > names remove the existing random noise. :-)
> >
> > In fact, on a second thought, I slightly prefer your
> > suggestion, as 'has_blocked_load' has a proper noun.
>
> I would prefer using 'has_blocked_load' as I find it easier to get
> that it's the same info saved in different places
>
> Thanks
Okay, agreed - the reworked -v3 version is attached.
I've optimistically added your Reviewed-by tag as well. :-)
Thanks,
Ingo
- Change from -v2: also rename to cfs_rq_has_blocked_load().
===================>
From 395fc683e48f6fe5f36082691681d0d64d1a48ff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 10:35:06 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] sched/fair: Sort out 'blocked_load*' namespace noise
There's three layers of logic in the scheduler that
deal with 'has_blocked' (load) handling of the NOHZ code:
(1) nohz.has_blocked,
(2) rq->has_blocked_load, deal with NOHZ idle balancing,
(3) and cfs_rq_has_blocked(), which is part of the layer
that is passing the SMP load-balancing signal to the
NOHZ layers.
The 'has_blocked' and 'has_blocked_load' names are used
in a mixed fashion, sometimes within the same function.
Standardize on 'has_blocked_load' to make it all easy
to read and easy to grep.
No change in functionality.
Suggested-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/aS6yvxyc3JfMxxQW@gmail.com
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index b6043ec4885b..76f5e4b78b30 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -7140,7 +7140,7 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(cpumask_var_t, should_we_balance_tmpmask);
static struct {
cpumask_var_t idle_cpus_mask;
atomic_t nr_cpus;
- int has_blocked; /* Idle CPUS has blocked load */
+ int has_blocked_load; /* Idle CPUS has blocked load */
int needs_update; /* Newly idle CPUs need their next_balance collated */
unsigned long next_balance; /* in jiffy units */
unsigned long next_blocked; /* Next update of blocked load in jiffies */
@@ -9776,7 +9776,7 @@ static void attach_tasks(struct lb_env *env)
}
#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON
-static inline bool cfs_rq_has_blocked(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
+static inline bool cfs_rq_has_blocked_load(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
{
if (cfs_rq->avg.load_avg)
return true;
@@ -9809,16 +9809,16 @@ static inline void update_blocked_load_tick(struct rq *rq)
WRITE_ONCE(rq->last_blocked_load_update_tick, jiffies);
}
-static inline void update_blocked_load_status(struct rq *rq, bool has_blocked)
+static inline void update_has_blocked_load_status(struct rq *rq, bool has_blocked_load)
{
- if (!has_blocked)
+ if (!has_blocked_load)
rq->has_blocked_load = 0;
}
#else /* !CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON: */
-static inline bool cfs_rq_has_blocked(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) { return false; }
+static inline bool cfs_rq_has_blocked_load(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) { return false; }
static inline bool others_have_blocked(struct rq *rq) { return false; }
static inline void update_blocked_load_tick(struct rq *rq) {}
-static inline void update_blocked_load_status(struct rq *rq, bool has_blocked) {}
+static inline void update_has_blocked_load_status(struct rq *rq, bool has_blocked_load) {}
#endif /* !CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON */
static bool __update_blocked_others(struct rq *rq, bool *done)
@@ -9875,7 +9875,7 @@ static bool __update_blocked_fair(struct rq *rq, bool *done)
list_del_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
/* Don't need periodic decay once load/util_avg are null */
- if (cfs_rq_has_blocked(cfs_rq))
+ if (cfs_rq_has_blocked_load(cfs_rq))
*done = false;
}
@@ -9935,7 +9935,7 @@ static bool __update_blocked_fair(struct rq *rq, bool *done)
bool decayed;
decayed = update_cfs_rq_load_avg(cfs_rq_clock_pelt(cfs_rq), cfs_rq);
- if (cfs_rq_has_blocked(cfs_rq))
+ if (cfs_rq_has_blocked_load(cfs_rq))
*done = false;
return decayed;
@@ -9956,7 +9956,7 @@ static void __sched_balance_update_blocked_averages(struct rq *rq)
decayed |= __update_blocked_others(rq, &done);
decayed |= __update_blocked_fair(rq, &done);
- update_blocked_load_status(rq, !done);
+ update_has_blocked_load_status(rq, !done);
if (decayed)
cpufreq_update_util(rq, 0);
}
@@ -12452,7 +12452,7 @@ static void nohz_balancer_kick(struct rq *rq)
if (likely(!atomic_read(&nohz.nr_cpus)))
return;
- if (READ_ONCE(nohz.has_blocked) &&
+ if (READ_ONCE(nohz.has_blocked_load) &&
time_after(now, READ_ONCE(nohz.next_blocked)))
flags = NOHZ_STATS_KICK;
@@ -12613,9 +12613,9 @@ void nohz_balance_enter_idle(int cpu)
/*
* The tick is still stopped but load could have been added in the
- * meantime. We set the nohz.has_blocked flag to trig a check of the
+ * meantime. We set the nohz.has_blocked_load flag to trig a check of the
* *_avg. The CPU is already part of nohz.idle_cpus_mask so the clear
- * of nohz.has_blocked can only happen after checking the new load
+ * of nohz.has_blocked_load can only happen after checking the new load
*/
if (rq->nohz_tick_stopped)
goto out;
@@ -12631,7 +12631,7 @@ void nohz_balance_enter_idle(int cpu)
/*
* Ensures that if nohz_idle_balance() fails to observe our
- * @idle_cpus_mask store, it must observe the @has_blocked
+ * @idle_cpus_mask store, it must observe the @has_blocked_load
* and @needs_update stores.
*/
smp_mb__after_atomic();
@@ -12644,7 +12644,7 @@ void nohz_balance_enter_idle(int cpu)
* Each time a cpu enter idle, we assume that it has blocked load and
* enable the periodic update of the load of idle CPUs
*/
- WRITE_ONCE(nohz.has_blocked, 1);
+ WRITE_ONCE(nohz.has_blocked_load, 1);
}
static bool update_nohz_stats(struct rq *rq)
@@ -12685,8 +12685,8 @@ static void _nohz_idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, unsigned int flags)
/*
* We assume there will be no idle load after this update and clear
- * the has_blocked flag. If a cpu enters idle in the mean time, it will
- * set the has_blocked flag and trigger another update of idle load.
+ * the has_blocked_load flag. If a cpu enters idle in the mean time, it will
+ * set the has_blocked_load flag and trigger another update of idle load.
* Because a cpu that becomes idle, is added to idle_cpus_mask before
* setting the flag, we are sure to not clear the state and not
* check the load of an idle cpu.
@@ -12694,12 +12694,12 @@ static void _nohz_idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, unsigned int flags)
* Same applies to idle_cpus_mask vs needs_update.
*/
if (flags & NOHZ_STATS_KICK)
- WRITE_ONCE(nohz.has_blocked, 0);
+ WRITE_ONCE(nohz.has_blocked_load, 0);
if (flags & NOHZ_NEXT_KICK)
WRITE_ONCE(nohz.needs_update, 0);
/*
- * Ensures that if we miss the CPU, we must see the has_blocked
+ * Ensures that if we miss the CPU, we must see the has_blocked_load
* store from nohz_balance_enter_idle().
*/
smp_mb();
@@ -12766,7 +12766,7 @@ static void _nohz_idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, unsigned int flags)
abort:
/* There is still blocked load, enable periodic update */
if (has_blocked_load)
- WRITE_ONCE(nohz.has_blocked, 1);
+ WRITE_ONCE(nohz.has_blocked_load, 1);
}
/*
@@ -12828,7 +12828,7 @@ static void nohz_newidle_balance(struct rq *this_rq)
return;
/* Don't need to update blocked load of idle CPUs*/
- if (!READ_ONCE(nohz.has_blocked) ||
+ if (!READ_ONCE(nohz.has_blocked_load) ||
time_before(jiffies, READ_ONCE(nohz.next_blocked)))
return;
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 1/1 -v3] sched/fair: Sort out 'blocked_load*' namespace noise
2025-12-02 16:09 ` [PATCH 1/1 -v3] " Ingo Molnar
@ 2025-12-02 16:55 ` Vincent Guittot
2025-12-02 20:26 ` Shrikanth Hegde
1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Vincent Guittot @ 2025-12-02 16:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ingo Molnar
Cc: linux-kernel, Peter Zijlstra, Frederic Weisbecker,
Shrikanth Hegde, Juri Lelli, Dietmar Eggemann, Valentin Schneider,
Linus Torvalds, Mel Gorman, Steven Rostedt, Thomas Gleixner
On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 at 17:10, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
>
>
> * Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 at 10:35, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > * Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 at 09:13, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > There's three separate, independent pieces of logic in the
> > > > > scheduler that are named 'has_blocked':
> > > > >
> > > > > 1) nohz.has_blocked,
> > > > > 2) rq->has_blocked_load - both of these relate to NOHZ balancing,
> > > > >
> > > > > 3) and cfs_rq_has_blocked(), which operates on SMP load-balancing
> > > > > averages.
> > > > >
> > > > > While reviewing this code I noticed a couple of inconsistencies:
> > > > >
> > > > > - nohz.has_blocked sometimes gets handled via a local variable
> > > > > that is named 'has_blocked_load' - but it's the runqueue
> > > > > that has the has_blocked_load field, not the nohz structure ...
> > > > >
> > > > > - The cfs_rq_has_blocked() function does SMP load-balancing and
> > > > > has no relation to NOHZ has_blocked logic.
> > > > >
> > > > > - The update_blocked_load_status() function, which sets the
> > > > > rq->has_blocked_load field, has a parameter named 'has_blocked',
> > > > > but that's the field name of the nohz structure.
> > > > >
> > > > > To sort all of this out, standardize on 3 distinct patterns:
> > > > >
> > > > > (1) nohz.has_blocked related functions and variables use the
> > > > > 'has_blocked' nomenclature,
> > > > >
> > > > > (2) rq->has_blocked_load related functions and variables use
> > > > > 'has_blocked_load',
> > > > >
> > > > > (3) and cfs_rq_has_blocked() uses 'has_blocked_load_avg'.
> > > >
> > > > They are all implementing the same feature: update the blocked pelt
> > > > signal of idle rqs.
> > >
> > > Yeah, should have said 3 separate layers of logic that
> > > each deal with the same thing, when writing the
> > > changelog I missed how update_blocked_load_status()
> > > feeds into rq->has_blocked_load via !done PELT signal
> > > we get back from the load-balancers and didn't look
> > > further. :-/
> > >
> > > > If we want some renaming, we should use the same naming for all to
> > > > show that it's all about the same thing
> > > >
> > > > nohz.has_blocked_load()
> > > > cfs_rq_has_blocked_load()
> > > > rq->has_blocked_load()
> > >
> > > I'd still argue that greppability of the 3 layers might
> > > have a small code readability value:
> > >
> > > git grep 'has_blocked\>' kernel/sched/
> > > git grep 'has_blocked_load\>' kernel/sched/
> > > git grep 'has_blocked_load_avg\>' kernel/sched/
> > >
> > > ... and I've fixed up the changelogs to say:
> > >
> > > There's three separate layers of logic in the scheduler that
> > > deal with 'has_blocked' handling of the NOHZ code:
> > >
> > > (1) nohz.has_blocked,
> > > (2) rq->has_blocked_load, deal with NOHZ idle balancing,
> > > (3) and cfs_rq_has_blocked(), which is part of the layer
> > > that is passing the SMP load-balancing signal to the
> > > NOHZ layers.
> > >
> > > To make it easier to separate them, split these 3 shared-mixed
> > > uses of 'has_blocked' name patterns into 3 distinct and greppable
> > > patterns:
> > >
> > > (1) nohz.has_blocked related functions and variables use
> > > 'has_blocked',
> > >
> > > (2) rq->has_blocked_load related functions and variables use
> > > 'has_blocked_load',
> > >
> > > (3) and cfs_rq_has_blocked() uses 'has_blocked_load_avg'.
> > >
> > > ... but if you still object to that notion, we can also
> > > do your suggestion - see the patch below. Both variants
> > > are fine to me, no strong preferences, as long as the
> > > names remove the existing random noise. :-)
> > >
> > > In fact, on a second thought, I slightly prefer your
> > > suggestion, as 'has_blocked_load' has a proper noun.
> >
> > I would prefer using 'has_blocked_load' as I find it easier to get
> > that it's the same info saved in different places
> >
> > Thanks
>
> Okay, agreed - the reworked -v3 version is attached.
> I've optimistically added your Reviewed-by tag as well. :-)
Yes, looks good to me
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ingo
>
> - Change from -v2: also rename to cfs_rq_has_blocked_load().
>
> ===================>
> From 395fc683e48f6fe5f36082691681d0d64d1a48ff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 10:35:06 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] sched/fair: Sort out 'blocked_load*' namespace noise
>
> There's three layers of logic in the scheduler that
> deal with 'has_blocked' (load) handling of the NOHZ code:
>
> (1) nohz.has_blocked,
> (2) rq->has_blocked_load, deal with NOHZ idle balancing,
> (3) and cfs_rq_has_blocked(), which is part of the layer
> that is passing the SMP load-balancing signal to the
> NOHZ layers.
>
> The 'has_blocked' and 'has_blocked_load' names are used
> in a mixed fashion, sometimes within the same function.
>
> Standardize on 'has_blocked_load' to make it all easy
> to read and easy to grep.
>
> No change in functionality.
>
> Suggested-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
> Cc: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/aS6yvxyc3JfMxxQW@gmail.com
> ---
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index b6043ec4885b..76f5e4b78b30 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -7140,7 +7140,7 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(cpumask_var_t, should_we_balance_tmpmask);
> static struct {
> cpumask_var_t idle_cpus_mask;
> atomic_t nr_cpus;
> - int has_blocked; /* Idle CPUS has blocked load */
> + int has_blocked_load; /* Idle CPUS has blocked load */
> int needs_update; /* Newly idle CPUs need their next_balance collated */
> unsigned long next_balance; /* in jiffy units */
> unsigned long next_blocked; /* Next update of blocked load in jiffies */
> @@ -9776,7 +9776,7 @@ static void attach_tasks(struct lb_env *env)
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON
> -static inline bool cfs_rq_has_blocked(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
> +static inline bool cfs_rq_has_blocked_load(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
> {
> if (cfs_rq->avg.load_avg)
> return true;
> @@ -9809,16 +9809,16 @@ static inline void update_blocked_load_tick(struct rq *rq)
> WRITE_ONCE(rq->last_blocked_load_update_tick, jiffies);
> }
>
> -static inline void update_blocked_load_status(struct rq *rq, bool has_blocked)
> +static inline void update_has_blocked_load_status(struct rq *rq, bool has_blocked_load)
> {
> - if (!has_blocked)
> + if (!has_blocked_load)
> rq->has_blocked_load = 0;
> }
> #else /* !CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON: */
> -static inline bool cfs_rq_has_blocked(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) { return false; }
> +static inline bool cfs_rq_has_blocked_load(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) { return false; }
> static inline bool others_have_blocked(struct rq *rq) { return false; }
> static inline void update_blocked_load_tick(struct rq *rq) {}
> -static inline void update_blocked_load_status(struct rq *rq, bool has_blocked) {}
> +static inline void update_has_blocked_load_status(struct rq *rq, bool has_blocked_load) {}
> #endif /* !CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON */
>
> static bool __update_blocked_others(struct rq *rq, bool *done)
> @@ -9875,7 +9875,7 @@ static bool __update_blocked_fair(struct rq *rq, bool *done)
> list_del_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
>
> /* Don't need periodic decay once load/util_avg are null */
> - if (cfs_rq_has_blocked(cfs_rq))
> + if (cfs_rq_has_blocked_load(cfs_rq))
> *done = false;
> }
>
> @@ -9935,7 +9935,7 @@ static bool __update_blocked_fair(struct rq *rq, bool *done)
> bool decayed;
>
> decayed = update_cfs_rq_load_avg(cfs_rq_clock_pelt(cfs_rq), cfs_rq);
> - if (cfs_rq_has_blocked(cfs_rq))
> + if (cfs_rq_has_blocked_load(cfs_rq))
> *done = false;
>
> return decayed;
> @@ -9956,7 +9956,7 @@ static void __sched_balance_update_blocked_averages(struct rq *rq)
> decayed |= __update_blocked_others(rq, &done);
> decayed |= __update_blocked_fair(rq, &done);
>
> - update_blocked_load_status(rq, !done);
> + update_has_blocked_load_status(rq, !done);
> if (decayed)
> cpufreq_update_util(rq, 0);
> }
> @@ -12452,7 +12452,7 @@ static void nohz_balancer_kick(struct rq *rq)
> if (likely(!atomic_read(&nohz.nr_cpus)))
> return;
>
> - if (READ_ONCE(nohz.has_blocked) &&
> + if (READ_ONCE(nohz.has_blocked_load) &&
> time_after(now, READ_ONCE(nohz.next_blocked)))
> flags = NOHZ_STATS_KICK;
>
> @@ -12613,9 +12613,9 @@ void nohz_balance_enter_idle(int cpu)
>
> /*
> * The tick is still stopped but load could have been added in the
> - * meantime. We set the nohz.has_blocked flag to trig a check of the
> + * meantime. We set the nohz.has_blocked_load flag to trig a check of the
> * *_avg. The CPU is already part of nohz.idle_cpus_mask so the clear
> - * of nohz.has_blocked can only happen after checking the new load
> + * of nohz.has_blocked_load can only happen after checking the new load
> */
> if (rq->nohz_tick_stopped)
> goto out;
> @@ -12631,7 +12631,7 @@ void nohz_balance_enter_idle(int cpu)
>
> /*
> * Ensures that if nohz_idle_balance() fails to observe our
> - * @idle_cpus_mask store, it must observe the @has_blocked
> + * @idle_cpus_mask store, it must observe the @has_blocked_load
> * and @needs_update stores.
> */
> smp_mb__after_atomic();
> @@ -12644,7 +12644,7 @@ void nohz_balance_enter_idle(int cpu)
> * Each time a cpu enter idle, we assume that it has blocked load and
> * enable the periodic update of the load of idle CPUs
> */
> - WRITE_ONCE(nohz.has_blocked, 1);
> + WRITE_ONCE(nohz.has_blocked_load, 1);
> }
>
> static bool update_nohz_stats(struct rq *rq)
> @@ -12685,8 +12685,8 @@ static void _nohz_idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, unsigned int flags)
>
> /*
> * We assume there will be no idle load after this update and clear
> - * the has_blocked flag. If a cpu enters idle in the mean time, it will
> - * set the has_blocked flag and trigger another update of idle load.
> + * the has_blocked_load flag. If a cpu enters idle in the mean time, it will
> + * set the has_blocked_load flag and trigger another update of idle load.
> * Because a cpu that becomes idle, is added to idle_cpus_mask before
> * setting the flag, we are sure to not clear the state and not
> * check the load of an idle cpu.
> @@ -12694,12 +12694,12 @@ static void _nohz_idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, unsigned int flags)
> * Same applies to idle_cpus_mask vs needs_update.
> */
> if (flags & NOHZ_STATS_KICK)
> - WRITE_ONCE(nohz.has_blocked, 0);
> + WRITE_ONCE(nohz.has_blocked_load, 0);
> if (flags & NOHZ_NEXT_KICK)
> WRITE_ONCE(nohz.needs_update, 0);
>
> /*
> - * Ensures that if we miss the CPU, we must see the has_blocked
> + * Ensures that if we miss the CPU, we must see the has_blocked_load
> * store from nohz_balance_enter_idle().
> */
> smp_mb();
> @@ -12766,7 +12766,7 @@ static void _nohz_idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, unsigned int flags)
> abort:
> /* There is still blocked load, enable periodic update */
> if (has_blocked_load)
> - WRITE_ONCE(nohz.has_blocked, 1);
> + WRITE_ONCE(nohz.has_blocked_load, 1);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -12828,7 +12828,7 @@ static void nohz_newidle_balance(struct rq *this_rq)
> return;
>
> /* Don't need to update blocked load of idle CPUs*/
> - if (!READ_ONCE(nohz.has_blocked) ||
> + if (!READ_ONCE(nohz.has_blocked_load) ||
> time_before(jiffies, READ_ONCE(nohz.next_blocked)))
> return;
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 1/1 -v3] sched/fair: Sort out 'blocked_load*' namespace noise
2025-12-02 16:09 ` [PATCH 1/1 -v3] " Ingo Molnar
2025-12-02 16:55 ` Vincent Guittot
@ 2025-12-02 20:26 ` Shrikanth Hegde
1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Shrikanth Hegde @ 2025-12-02 20:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ingo Molnar, Vincent Guittot
Cc: linux-kernel, Peter Zijlstra, Frederic Weisbecker, Juri Lelli,
Dietmar Eggemann, Valentin Schneider, Linus Torvalds, Mel Gorman,
Steven Rostedt, Thomas Gleixner
> From 395fc683e48f6fe5f36082691681d0d64d1a48ff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 10:35:06 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] sched/fair: Sort out 'blocked_load*' namespace noise
>
> There's three layers of logic in the scheduler that
> deal with 'has_blocked' (load) handling of the NOHZ code:
>
> (1) nohz.has_blocked,
> (2) rq->has_blocked_load, deal with NOHZ idle balancing,
> (3) and cfs_rq_has_blocked(), which is part of the layer
> that is passing the SMP load-balancing signal to the
> NOHZ layers.
>
> The 'has_blocked' and 'has_blocked_load' names are used
> in a mixed fashion, sometimes within the same function.
>
> Standardize on 'has_blocked_load' to make it all easy
> to read and easy to grep.
>
> No change in functionality.
>
Nothing to do with this patch, but for my understanding.
rq->has_blocked_load - is reset when there is no cfs,rt,dl or irq or hw_pressure.
That meant this CPU is idle for sometime right?
Then just before disabling the tick, it is set to 1 again in nohz_balance_enter_idle.
at that point also it won't have anything on its rq right? it would set nohz.has_blocked_load
and that could trigger a NOHZ_STATS_KICK. That doesn't do any balancing per se. It would
update the same rq->has_blocked_load=0 again.
When it wakes up after sometime, i don't see rq->has_blocked_load updated. So it would continue
to be 0 until it hits nohz_balance_enter_idle?
> Suggested-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
> Cc: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/aS6yvxyc3JfMxxQW@gmail.com
> ---
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index b6043ec4885b..76f5e4b78b30 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -7140,7 +7140,7 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(cpumask_var_t, should_we_balance_tmpmask);
> static struct {
> cpumask_var_t idle_cpus_mask;
> atomic_t nr_cpus;
> - int has_blocked; /* Idle CPUS has blocked load */
> + int has_blocked_load; /* Idle CPUS has blocked load */
> int needs_update; /* Newly idle CPUs need their next_balance collated */
> unsigned long next_balance; /* in jiffy units */
> unsigned long next_blocked; /* Next update of blocked load in jiffies */
> @@ -9776,7 +9776,7 @@ static void attach_tasks(struct lb_env *env)
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON
> -static inline bool cfs_rq_has_blocked(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
> +static inline bool cfs_rq_has_blocked_load(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
> {
> if (cfs_rq->avg.load_avg)
> return true;
> @@ -9809,16 +9809,16 @@ static inline void update_blocked_load_tick(struct rq *rq)
> WRITE_ONCE(rq->last_blocked_load_update_tick, jiffies);
> }
>
> -static inline void update_blocked_load_status(struct rq *rq, bool has_blocked)
> +static inline void update_has_blocked_load_status(struct rq *rq, bool has_blocked_load)
> {
> - if (!has_blocked)
> + if (!has_blocked_load)
> rq->has_blocked_load = 0;
> }
> #else /* !CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON: */
> -static inline bool cfs_rq_has_blocked(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) { return false; }
> +static inline bool cfs_rq_has_blocked_load(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) { return false; }
> static inline bool others_have_blocked(struct rq *rq) { return false; }
> static inline void update_blocked_load_tick(struct rq *rq) {}
> -static inline void update_blocked_load_status(struct rq *rq, bool has_blocked) {}
> +static inline void update_has_blocked_load_status(struct rq *rq, bool has_blocked_load) {}
> #endif /* !CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON */
>
> static bool __update_blocked_others(struct rq *rq, bool *done)
> @@ -9875,7 +9875,7 @@ static bool __update_blocked_fair(struct rq *rq, bool *done)
> list_del_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
>
> /* Don't need periodic decay once load/util_avg are null */
> - if (cfs_rq_has_blocked(cfs_rq))
> + if (cfs_rq_has_blocked_load(cfs_rq))
> *done = false;
> }
>
> @@ -9935,7 +9935,7 @@ static bool __update_blocked_fair(struct rq *rq, bool *done)
> bool decayed;
>
> decayed = update_cfs_rq_load_avg(cfs_rq_clock_pelt(cfs_rq), cfs_rq);
> - if (cfs_rq_has_blocked(cfs_rq))
> + if (cfs_rq_has_blocked_load(cfs_rq))
> *done = false;
>
> return decayed;
> @@ -9956,7 +9956,7 @@ static void __sched_balance_update_blocked_averages(struct rq *rq)
> decayed |= __update_blocked_others(rq, &done);
> decayed |= __update_blocked_fair(rq, &done);
>
> - update_blocked_load_status(rq, !done);
> + update_has_blocked_load_status(rq, !done);
> if (decayed)
> cpufreq_update_util(rq, 0);
> }
> @@ -12452,7 +12452,7 @@ static void nohz_balancer_kick(struct rq *rq)
> if (likely(!atomic_read(&nohz.nr_cpus)))
> return;
>
> - if (READ_ONCE(nohz.has_blocked) &&
> + if (READ_ONCE(nohz.has_blocked_load) &&
> time_after(now, READ_ONCE(nohz.next_blocked)))
> flags = NOHZ_STATS_KICK;
>
> @@ -12613,9 +12613,9 @@ void nohz_balance_enter_idle(int cpu)
>
> /*
> * The tick is still stopped but load could have been added in the
> - * meantime. We set the nohz.has_blocked flag to trig a check of the
> + * meantime. We set the nohz.has_blocked_load flag to trig a check of the
> * *_avg. The CPU is already part of nohz.idle_cpus_mask so the clear
> - * of nohz.has_blocked can only happen after checking the new load
> + * of nohz.has_blocked_load can only happen after checking the new load
> */
> if (rq->nohz_tick_stopped)
> goto out;
> @@ -12631,7 +12631,7 @@ void nohz_balance_enter_idle(int cpu)
>
> /*
> * Ensures that if nohz_idle_balance() fails to observe our
> - * @idle_cpus_mask store, it must observe the @has_blocked
> + * @idle_cpus_mask store, it must observe the @has_blocked_load
> * and @needs_update stores.
> */
> smp_mb__after_atomic();
> @@ -12644,7 +12644,7 @@ void nohz_balance_enter_idle(int cpu)
> * Each time a cpu enter idle, we assume that it has blocked load and
> * enable the periodic update of the load of idle CPUs
> */
> - WRITE_ONCE(nohz.has_blocked, 1);
> + WRITE_ONCE(nohz.has_blocked_load, 1);
> }
>
> static bool update_nohz_stats(struct rq *rq)
> @@ -12685,8 +12685,8 @@ static void _nohz_idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, unsigned int flags)
>
> /*
> * We assume there will be no idle load after this update and clear
> - * the has_blocked flag. If a cpu enters idle in the mean time, it will
> - * set the has_blocked flag and trigger another update of idle load.
> + * the has_blocked_load flag. If a cpu enters idle in the mean time, it will
> + * set the has_blocked_load flag and trigger another update of idle load.
> * Because a cpu that becomes idle, is added to idle_cpus_mask before
> * setting the flag, we are sure to not clear the state and not
> * check the load of an idle cpu.
> @@ -12694,12 +12694,12 @@ static void _nohz_idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, unsigned int flags)
> * Same applies to idle_cpus_mask vs needs_update.
> */
> if (flags & NOHZ_STATS_KICK)
> - WRITE_ONCE(nohz.has_blocked, 0);
> + WRITE_ONCE(nohz.has_blocked_load, 0);
> if (flags & NOHZ_NEXT_KICK)
> WRITE_ONCE(nohz.needs_update, 0);
>
> /*
> - * Ensures that if we miss the CPU, we must see the has_blocked
> + * Ensures that if we miss the CPU, we must see the has_blocked_load
> * store from nohz_balance_enter_idle().
> */
> smp_mb();
> @@ -12766,7 +12766,7 @@ static void _nohz_idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, unsigned int flags)
> abort:
> /* There is still blocked load, enable periodic update */
> if (has_blocked_load)
> - WRITE_ONCE(nohz.has_blocked, 1);
> + WRITE_ONCE(nohz.has_blocked_load, 1);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -12828,7 +12828,7 @@ static void nohz_newidle_balance(struct rq *this_rq)
> return;
>
> /* Don't need to update blocked load of idle CPUs*/
> - if (!READ_ONCE(nohz.has_blocked) ||
> + if (!READ_ONCE(nohz.has_blocked_load) ||
> time_before(jiffies, READ_ONCE(nohz.next_blocked)))
> return;
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [tip: sched/core] sched/fair: Sort out 'blocked_load*' namespace noise
2025-12-02 9:34 ` [PATCH 1/1 -v2] sched/fair: Sort out 'blocked_load*' namespace noise Ingo Molnar
2025-12-02 10:13 ` Vincent Guittot
@ 2025-12-14 7:46 ` tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2025-12-15 7:59 ` tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar @ 2025-12-14 7:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-tip-commits
Cc: Vincent Guittot, Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra, Frederic Weisbecker,
Shrikanth Hegde, x86, linux-kernel
The following commit has been merged into the sched/core branch of tip:
Commit-ID: 098f3900b035ab94fccd19d77b9ec2b13c300599
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/098f3900b035ab94fccd19d77b9ec2b13c300599
Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
AuthorDate: Tue, 02 Dec 2025 10:35:06 +01:00
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitterDate: Sun, 14 Dec 2025 08:25:03 +01:00
sched/fair: Sort out 'blocked_load*' namespace noise
There's three layers of logic in the scheduler that
deal with 'has_blocked' (load) handling of the NOHZ code:
(1) nohz.has_blocked,
(2) rq->has_blocked_load, deal with NOHZ idle balancing,
(3) and cfs_rq_has_blocked(), which is part of the layer
that is passing the SMP load-balancing signal to the
NOHZ layers.
The 'has_blocked' and 'has_blocked_load' names are used
in a mixed fashion, sometimes within the same function.
Standardize on 'has_blocked_load' to make it all easy
to read and easy to grep.
No change in functionality.
Suggested-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/aS6yvxyc3JfMxxQW@gmail.com
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index b6043ec..76f5e4b 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -7140,7 +7140,7 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(cpumask_var_t, should_we_balance_tmpmask);
static struct {
cpumask_var_t idle_cpus_mask;
atomic_t nr_cpus;
- int has_blocked; /* Idle CPUS has blocked load */
+ int has_blocked_load; /* Idle CPUS has blocked load */
int needs_update; /* Newly idle CPUs need their next_balance collated */
unsigned long next_balance; /* in jiffy units */
unsigned long next_blocked; /* Next update of blocked load in jiffies */
@@ -9776,7 +9776,7 @@ static void attach_tasks(struct lb_env *env)
}
#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON
-static inline bool cfs_rq_has_blocked(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
+static inline bool cfs_rq_has_blocked_load(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
{
if (cfs_rq->avg.load_avg)
return true;
@@ -9809,16 +9809,16 @@ static inline void update_blocked_load_tick(struct rq *rq)
WRITE_ONCE(rq->last_blocked_load_update_tick, jiffies);
}
-static inline void update_blocked_load_status(struct rq *rq, bool has_blocked)
+static inline void update_has_blocked_load_status(struct rq *rq, bool has_blocked_load)
{
- if (!has_blocked)
+ if (!has_blocked_load)
rq->has_blocked_load = 0;
}
#else /* !CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON: */
-static inline bool cfs_rq_has_blocked(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) { return false; }
+static inline bool cfs_rq_has_blocked_load(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) { return false; }
static inline bool others_have_blocked(struct rq *rq) { return false; }
static inline void update_blocked_load_tick(struct rq *rq) {}
-static inline void update_blocked_load_status(struct rq *rq, bool has_blocked) {}
+static inline void update_has_blocked_load_status(struct rq *rq, bool has_blocked_load) {}
#endif /* !CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON */
static bool __update_blocked_others(struct rq *rq, bool *done)
@@ -9875,7 +9875,7 @@ static bool __update_blocked_fair(struct rq *rq, bool *done)
list_del_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
/* Don't need periodic decay once load/util_avg are null */
- if (cfs_rq_has_blocked(cfs_rq))
+ if (cfs_rq_has_blocked_load(cfs_rq))
*done = false;
}
@@ -9935,7 +9935,7 @@ static bool __update_blocked_fair(struct rq *rq, bool *done)
bool decayed;
decayed = update_cfs_rq_load_avg(cfs_rq_clock_pelt(cfs_rq), cfs_rq);
- if (cfs_rq_has_blocked(cfs_rq))
+ if (cfs_rq_has_blocked_load(cfs_rq))
*done = false;
return decayed;
@@ -9956,7 +9956,7 @@ static void __sched_balance_update_blocked_averages(struct rq *rq)
decayed |= __update_blocked_others(rq, &done);
decayed |= __update_blocked_fair(rq, &done);
- update_blocked_load_status(rq, !done);
+ update_has_blocked_load_status(rq, !done);
if (decayed)
cpufreq_update_util(rq, 0);
}
@@ -12452,7 +12452,7 @@ static void nohz_balancer_kick(struct rq *rq)
if (likely(!atomic_read(&nohz.nr_cpus)))
return;
- if (READ_ONCE(nohz.has_blocked) &&
+ if (READ_ONCE(nohz.has_blocked_load) &&
time_after(now, READ_ONCE(nohz.next_blocked)))
flags = NOHZ_STATS_KICK;
@@ -12613,9 +12613,9 @@ void nohz_balance_enter_idle(int cpu)
/*
* The tick is still stopped but load could have been added in the
- * meantime. We set the nohz.has_blocked flag to trig a check of the
+ * meantime. We set the nohz.has_blocked_load flag to trig a check of the
* *_avg. The CPU is already part of nohz.idle_cpus_mask so the clear
- * of nohz.has_blocked can only happen after checking the new load
+ * of nohz.has_blocked_load can only happen after checking the new load
*/
if (rq->nohz_tick_stopped)
goto out;
@@ -12631,7 +12631,7 @@ void nohz_balance_enter_idle(int cpu)
/*
* Ensures that if nohz_idle_balance() fails to observe our
- * @idle_cpus_mask store, it must observe the @has_blocked
+ * @idle_cpus_mask store, it must observe the @has_blocked_load
* and @needs_update stores.
*/
smp_mb__after_atomic();
@@ -12644,7 +12644,7 @@ out:
* Each time a cpu enter idle, we assume that it has blocked load and
* enable the periodic update of the load of idle CPUs
*/
- WRITE_ONCE(nohz.has_blocked, 1);
+ WRITE_ONCE(nohz.has_blocked_load, 1);
}
static bool update_nohz_stats(struct rq *rq)
@@ -12685,8 +12685,8 @@ static void _nohz_idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, unsigned int flags)
/*
* We assume there will be no idle load after this update and clear
- * the has_blocked flag. If a cpu enters idle in the mean time, it will
- * set the has_blocked flag and trigger another update of idle load.
+ * the has_blocked_load flag. If a cpu enters idle in the mean time, it will
+ * set the has_blocked_load flag and trigger another update of idle load.
* Because a cpu that becomes idle, is added to idle_cpus_mask before
* setting the flag, we are sure to not clear the state and not
* check the load of an idle cpu.
@@ -12694,12 +12694,12 @@ static void _nohz_idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, unsigned int flags)
* Same applies to idle_cpus_mask vs needs_update.
*/
if (flags & NOHZ_STATS_KICK)
- WRITE_ONCE(nohz.has_blocked, 0);
+ WRITE_ONCE(nohz.has_blocked_load, 0);
if (flags & NOHZ_NEXT_KICK)
WRITE_ONCE(nohz.needs_update, 0);
/*
- * Ensures that if we miss the CPU, we must see the has_blocked
+ * Ensures that if we miss the CPU, we must see the has_blocked_load
* store from nohz_balance_enter_idle().
*/
smp_mb();
@@ -12766,7 +12766,7 @@ static void _nohz_idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, unsigned int flags)
abort:
/* There is still blocked load, enable periodic update */
if (has_blocked_load)
- WRITE_ONCE(nohz.has_blocked, 1);
+ WRITE_ONCE(nohz.has_blocked_load, 1);
}
/*
@@ -12828,7 +12828,7 @@ static void nohz_newidle_balance(struct rq *this_rq)
return;
/* Don't need to update blocked load of idle CPUs*/
- if (!READ_ONCE(nohz.has_blocked) ||
+ if (!READ_ONCE(nohz.has_blocked_load) ||
time_before(jiffies, READ_ONCE(nohz.next_blocked)))
return;
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* [tip: sched/core] sched/fair: Sort out 'blocked_load*' namespace noise
2025-12-02 9:34 ` [PATCH 1/1 -v2] sched/fair: Sort out 'blocked_load*' namespace noise Ingo Molnar
2025-12-02 10:13 ` Vincent Guittot
2025-12-14 7:46 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
@ 2025-12-15 7:59 ` tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar @ 2025-12-15 7:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-tip-commits
Cc: Vincent Guittot, Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra, Frederic Weisbecker,
Shrikanth Hegde, x86, linux-kernel
The following commit has been merged into the sched/core branch of tip:
Commit-ID: 527a521029c3edd38fb9fc96cd58e3fd7393d28e
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/527a521029c3edd38fb9fc96cd58e3fd7393d28e
Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
AuthorDate: Tue, 02 Dec 2025 10:35:06 +01:00
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitterDate: Mon, 15 Dec 2025 07:52:45 +01:00
sched/fair: Sort out 'blocked_load*' namespace noise
There's three layers of logic in the scheduler that
deal with 'has_blocked' (load) handling of the NOHZ code:
(1) nohz.has_blocked,
(2) rq->has_blocked_load, deal with NOHZ idle balancing,
(3) and cfs_rq_has_blocked(), which is part of the layer
that is passing the SMP load-balancing signal to the
NOHZ layers.
The 'has_blocked' and 'has_blocked_load' names are used
in a mixed fashion, sometimes within the same function.
Standardize on 'has_blocked_load' to make it all easy
to read and easy to grep.
No change in functionality.
Suggested-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/aS6yvxyc3JfMxxQW@gmail.com
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index a8ac68d..d588eb8 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -7140,7 +7140,7 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(cpumask_var_t, should_we_balance_tmpmask);
static struct {
cpumask_var_t idle_cpus_mask;
atomic_t nr_cpus;
- int has_blocked; /* Idle CPUS has blocked load */
+ int has_blocked_load; /* Idle CPUS has blocked load */
int needs_update; /* Newly idle CPUs need their next_balance collated */
unsigned long next_balance; /* in jiffy units */
unsigned long next_blocked; /* Next update of blocked load in jiffies */
@@ -9770,7 +9770,7 @@ static void attach_tasks(struct lb_env *env)
}
#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON
-static inline bool cfs_rq_has_blocked(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
+static inline bool cfs_rq_has_blocked_load(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
{
if (cfs_rq->avg.load_avg)
return true;
@@ -9803,16 +9803,16 @@ static inline void update_blocked_load_tick(struct rq *rq)
WRITE_ONCE(rq->last_blocked_load_update_tick, jiffies);
}
-static inline void update_blocked_load_status(struct rq *rq, bool has_blocked)
+static inline void update_has_blocked_load_status(struct rq *rq, bool has_blocked_load)
{
- if (!has_blocked)
+ if (!has_blocked_load)
rq->has_blocked_load = 0;
}
#else /* !CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON: */
-static inline bool cfs_rq_has_blocked(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) { return false; }
+static inline bool cfs_rq_has_blocked_load(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq) { return false; }
static inline bool others_have_blocked(struct rq *rq) { return false; }
static inline void update_blocked_load_tick(struct rq *rq) {}
-static inline void update_blocked_load_status(struct rq *rq, bool has_blocked) {}
+static inline void update_has_blocked_load_status(struct rq *rq, bool has_blocked_load) {}
#endif /* !CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON */
static bool __update_blocked_others(struct rq *rq, bool *done)
@@ -9869,7 +9869,7 @@ static bool __update_blocked_fair(struct rq *rq, bool *done)
list_del_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
/* Don't need periodic decay once load/util_avg are null */
- if (cfs_rq_has_blocked(cfs_rq))
+ if (cfs_rq_has_blocked_load(cfs_rq))
*done = false;
}
@@ -9929,7 +9929,7 @@ static bool __update_blocked_fair(struct rq *rq, bool *done)
bool decayed;
decayed = update_cfs_rq_load_avg(cfs_rq_clock_pelt(cfs_rq), cfs_rq);
- if (cfs_rq_has_blocked(cfs_rq))
+ if (cfs_rq_has_blocked_load(cfs_rq))
*done = false;
return decayed;
@@ -9950,7 +9950,7 @@ static void __sched_balance_update_blocked_averages(struct rq *rq)
decayed |= __update_blocked_others(rq, &done);
decayed |= __update_blocked_fair(rq, &done);
- update_blocked_load_status(rq, !done);
+ update_has_blocked_load_status(rq, !done);
if (decayed)
cpufreq_update_util(rq, 0);
}
@@ -12446,7 +12446,7 @@ static void nohz_balancer_kick(struct rq *rq)
if (likely(!atomic_read(&nohz.nr_cpus)))
return;
- if (READ_ONCE(nohz.has_blocked) &&
+ if (READ_ONCE(nohz.has_blocked_load) &&
time_after(now, READ_ONCE(nohz.next_blocked)))
flags = NOHZ_STATS_KICK;
@@ -12607,9 +12607,9 @@ void nohz_balance_enter_idle(int cpu)
/*
* The tick is still stopped but load could have been added in the
- * meantime. We set the nohz.has_blocked flag to trig a check of the
+ * meantime. We set the nohz.has_blocked_load flag to trig a check of the
* *_avg. The CPU is already part of nohz.idle_cpus_mask so the clear
- * of nohz.has_blocked can only happen after checking the new load
+ * of nohz.has_blocked_load can only happen after checking the new load
*/
if (rq->nohz_tick_stopped)
goto out;
@@ -12625,7 +12625,7 @@ void nohz_balance_enter_idle(int cpu)
/*
* Ensures that if nohz_idle_balance() fails to observe our
- * @idle_cpus_mask store, it must observe the @has_blocked
+ * @idle_cpus_mask store, it must observe the @has_blocked_load
* and @needs_update stores.
*/
smp_mb__after_atomic();
@@ -12638,7 +12638,7 @@ out:
* Each time a cpu enter idle, we assume that it has blocked load and
* enable the periodic update of the load of idle CPUs
*/
- WRITE_ONCE(nohz.has_blocked, 1);
+ WRITE_ONCE(nohz.has_blocked_load, 1);
}
static bool update_nohz_stats(struct rq *rq)
@@ -12679,8 +12679,8 @@ static void _nohz_idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, unsigned int flags)
/*
* We assume there will be no idle load after this update and clear
- * the has_blocked flag. If a cpu enters idle in the mean time, it will
- * set the has_blocked flag and trigger another update of idle load.
+ * the has_blocked_load flag. If a cpu enters idle in the mean time, it will
+ * set the has_blocked_load flag and trigger another update of idle load.
* Because a cpu that becomes idle, is added to idle_cpus_mask before
* setting the flag, we are sure to not clear the state and not
* check the load of an idle cpu.
@@ -12688,12 +12688,12 @@ static void _nohz_idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, unsigned int flags)
* Same applies to idle_cpus_mask vs needs_update.
*/
if (flags & NOHZ_STATS_KICK)
- WRITE_ONCE(nohz.has_blocked, 0);
+ WRITE_ONCE(nohz.has_blocked_load, 0);
if (flags & NOHZ_NEXT_KICK)
WRITE_ONCE(nohz.needs_update, 0);
/*
- * Ensures that if we miss the CPU, we must see the has_blocked
+ * Ensures that if we miss the CPU, we must see the has_blocked_load
* store from nohz_balance_enter_idle().
*/
smp_mb();
@@ -12760,7 +12760,7 @@ static void _nohz_idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, unsigned int flags)
abort:
/* There is still blocked load, enable periodic update */
if (has_blocked_load)
- WRITE_ONCE(nohz.has_blocked, 1);
+ WRITE_ONCE(nohz.has_blocked_load, 1);
}
/*
@@ -12822,7 +12822,7 @@ static void nohz_newidle_balance(struct rq *this_rq)
return;
/* Don't need to update blocked load of idle CPUs*/
- if (!READ_ONCE(nohz.has_blocked) ||
+ if (!READ_ONCE(nohz.has_blocked_load) ||
time_before(jiffies, READ_ONCE(nohz.next_blocked)))
return;
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread