From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com>,
Maciej Wieczor-Retman <maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com>,
Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>,
"Drew Fustini" <dfustini@baylibre.com>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>, Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>,
<x86@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<patches@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 07/32] x86,fs/resctrl: Use struct rdt_domain_hdr when reading counters
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 12:33:20 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aS9NEJAnx0MWoyaT@agluck-desk3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <895cee86-ac6e-43e7-aece-e283200384ef@intel.com>
On Tue, Dec 02, 2025 at 08:06:47AM -0800, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> Hi Tony,
> > +static int __l3_mon_event_count_sum(struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp, struct rmid_read *rr)
> > +{
> > + int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> > + u32 closid = rdtgrp->closid;
> > + u32 rmid = rdtgrp->mon.rmid;
> > + struct rdt_mon_domain *d;
> > + int cntr_id = -ENOENT;
> > + u64 tval = 0;
> > + int err, ret;
> >
> > /* Summing domains that share a cache, must be on a CPU for that cache. */
> > if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &rr->ci->shared_cpu_map))
> > @@ -480,7 +494,7 @@ static int __l3_mon_event_count(struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp, struct rmid_read *rr)
> > err = resctrl_arch_cntr_read(rr->r, d, closid, rmid, cntr_id,
> > rr->evtid, &tval);
>
> This is not safe. The current __mon_event_count() implementation being refactored by this series
> ensures that if rr->is_mbm_cntr is true then cntr_id is valid. This patch places the code doing so
> in __l3_mon_event_count() without an equivalent in the new __l3_mon_event_count_sum(). From what I
> can tell, since __l3_mon_event_count_sum() sets cntr_id to -ENOENT and never initializes it correctly,
> resctrl_arch_cntr_read() will be called with an invalid cntr_id that it is not able to handle.
>
> There is no overlap in support for SNC and assignable counters. Do you expect that this is something that
> should be supported? Even if it is, SNC is model specific so it may be reasonable to expect that when/if
> a system supporting both features arrives it would need enabling anyway. I thus propose for simplicity
> that the handling of assignable counters by __l3_mon_event_count_sum() be dropped, albeit with a loud
> complaint if it is ever called with rr->is_mbm_cntr set.
>
Reinette,
Agreed. I see little liklihood that SNC and assignable counters will
meet on a system.
How does this look for the "loud complaint":
static int __l3_mon_event_count_sum(struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp, struct rmid_read *rr)
{
int cpu = smp_processor_id();
u32 closid = rdtgrp->closid;
u32 rmid = rdtgrp->mon.rmid;
struct rdt_mon_domain *d;
u64 tval = 0;
int err, ret;
/*
* Summing across domains is only done for systems that implement
* Sub-NUMA Cluster. There is no overlap with systems that support
* assignable counters.
*/
if (rr->is_mbm_cntr) {
pr_warn_once("Assignable counter on SNC system!\n");
rr->err = -EINVAL;
return -EINVAL;
}
/* Summing domains that share a cache, must be on a CPU for that cache. */
if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &rr->ci->shared_cpu_map))
return -EINVAL;
/*
* Legacy files must report the sum of an event across all
* domains that share the same L3 cache instance.
* Report success if a read from any domain succeeds, -EINVAL
* (translated to "Unavailable" for user space) if reading from
* all domains fail for any reason.
*/
ret = -EINVAL;
list_for_each_entry(d, &rr->r->mon_domains, hdr.list) {
if (d->ci_id != rr->ci->id)
continue;
err = resctrl_arch_rmid_read(rr->r, &d->hdr, closid, rmid,
rr->evtid, &tval, rr->arch_mon_ctx);
if (!err) {
rr->val += tval;
ret = 0;
}
}
if (ret)
rr->err = ret;
return ret;
}
-Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-02 20:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-24 18:53 [PATCH v14 00/32] x86,fs/resctrl telemetry monitoring Tony Luck
2025-11-24 18:53 ` [PATCH v14 01/32] x86,fs/resctrl: Improve domain type checking Tony Luck
2025-11-24 18:53 ` [PATCH v14 02/32] x86/resctrl: Move L3 initialization into new helper function Tony Luck
2025-11-24 18:53 ` [PATCH v14 03/32] x86/resctrl: Refactor domain_remove_cpu_mon() ready for new domain types Tony Luck
2025-12-02 16:01 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-11-24 18:53 ` [PATCH v14 04/32] x86/resctrl: Clean up domain_remove_cpu_ctrl() Tony Luck
2025-11-24 18:53 ` [PATCH v14 05/32] x86,fs/resctrl: Refactor domain create/remove using struct rdt_domain_hdr Tony Luck
2025-12-02 16:01 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-11-24 18:53 ` [PATCH v14 06/32] fs/resctrl: Split L3 dependent parts out of __mon_event_count() Tony Luck
2025-12-02 16:02 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-11-24 18:53 ` [PATCH v14 07/32] x86,fs/resctrl: Use struct rdt_domain_hdr when reading counters Tony Luck
2025-12-02 16:06 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-12-02 20:33 ` Luck, Tony [this message]
2025-12-02 22:24 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-12-02 23:22 ` Luck, Tony
2025-11-24 18:53 ` [PATCH v14 08/32] x86,fs/resctrl: Rename struct rdt_mon_domain and rdt_hw_mon_domain Tony Luck
2025-12-02 16:07 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-11-24 18:53 ` [PATCH v14 09/32] x86,fs/resctrl: Rename some L3 specific functions Tony Luck
2025-11-24 18:53 ` [PATCH v14 10/32] fs/resctrl: Make event details accessible to functions when reading events Tony Luck
2025-11-24 18:53 ` [PATCH v14 11/32] x86,fs/resctrl: Handle events that can be read from any CPU Tony Luck
2025-12-02 16:08 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-11-24 18:53 ` [PATCH v14 12/32] x86,fs/resctrl: Support binary fixed point event counters Tony Luck
2025-12-02 16:11 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-11-24 18:53 ` [PATCH v14 13/32] x86,fs/resctrl: Add an architectural hook called for each mount Tony Luck
2025-11-24 18:53 ` [PATCH v14 14/32] x86,fs/resctrl: Add and initialize rdt_resource for package scope monitor Tony Luck
2025-12-02 16:11 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-11-24 18:53 ` [PATCH v14 15/32] fs/resctrl: Emphasize that L3 monitoring resource is required for summing domains Tony Luck
2025-11-24 18:53 ` [PATCH v14 16/32] x86/resctrl: Discover hardware telemetry events Tony Luck
2025-12-02 16:18 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-11-24 18:53 ` [PATCH v14 17/32] x86,fs/resctrl: Fill in details of events for guid 0x26696143 and 0x26557651 Tony Luck
2025-12-02 16:19 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-11-24 18:53 ` [PATCH v14 18/32] x86,fs/resctrl: Add architectural event pointer Tony Luck
2025-11-24 18:53 ` [PATCH v14 19/32] x86/resctrl: Find and enable usable telemetry events Tony Luck
2025-12-02 16:21 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-11-24 18:53 ` [PATCH v14 20/32] x86/resctrl: Read " Tony Luck
2025-12-02 16:21 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-11-24 18:53 ` [PATCH v14 21/32] fs/resctrl: Refactor mkdir_mondata_subdir() Tony Luck
2025-11-24 18:53 ` [PATCH v14 22/32] fs/resctrl: Refactor rmdir_mondata_subdir_allrdtgrp() Tony Luck
2025-11-24 18:54 ` [PATCH v14 23/32] x86,fs/resctrl: Handle domain creation/deletion for RDT_RESOURCE_PERF_PKG Tony Luck
2025-11-24 18:54 ` [PATCH v14 24/32] x86/resctrl: Add energy/perf choices to rdt boot option Tony Luck
2025-12-02 16:28 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-12-03 18:04 ` Luck, Tony
2025-12-03 21:21 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-12-03 22:27 ` Luck, Tony
2025-12-03 23:25 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-11-24 18:54 ` [PATCH v14 25/32] x86/resctrl: Handle number of RMIDs supported by RDT_RESOURCE_PERF_PKG Tony Luck
2025-12-02 16:31 ` Reinette Chatre
2025-11-24 18:54 ` [PATCH v14 26/32] fs/resctrl: Move allocation/free of closid_num_dirty_rmid[] Tony Luck
2025-11-24 18:54 ` [PATCH v14 27/32] x86,fs/resctrl: Compute number of RMIDs as minimum across resources Tony Luck
2025-11-24 18:54 ` [PATCH v14 28/32] fs/resctrl: Move RMID initialization to first mount Tony Luck
2025-11-24 18:54 ` [PATCH v14 29/32] x86/resctrl: Enable RDT_RESOURCE_PERF_PKG Tony Luck
2025-11-24 18:54 ` [PATCH v14 30/32] fs/resctrl: Provide interface to create architecture specific debugfs area Tony Luck
2025-11-24 18:54 ` [PATCH v14 31/32] x86/resctrl: Add debugfs files to show telemetry aggregator status Tony Luck
2025-11-24 18:54 ` [PATCH v14 32/32] x86,fs/resctrl: Update documentation for telemetry events Tony Luck
2025-12-02 16:34 ` Reinette Chatre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aS9NEJAnx0MWoyaT@agluck-desk3 \
--to=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=dfustini@baylibre.com \
--cc=fenghuay@nvidia.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=peternewman@google.com \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox