From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C354224CEEA
	for <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; Mon, 24 Nov 2025 19:36:49 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201
ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116;
	t=1764013009; cv=none; b=tJr4fB/cVVmq0AeqB4LWD0vQQw5AZrYUs8yQ4NS5OzlOEs7bCOv/6zuJjkVZ75CTds7pPYr9xieBhUrZ/+fzwvi0Sai2HrYsu2StxqGB0fpVBvdSfgf4dTTfcZvo9nmCfRXUokElki/puHJlYW3T0MjYTHGVGsKu+DCUMXy6UBE=
ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org;
	s=arc-20240116; t=1764013009; c=relaxed/simple;
	bh=OL3okPX96JuUPTbgrH0HQh3n0Y+t1xonvad58NS6QR0=;
	h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:
	 Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=fjd8H+fXhsyWB1djMz8MudM1xe1HG3GFtsswV634ruyoo7Dczh8rBPBtGEFfaWzF8727dTAOMQpScyyN1ZZ3XpERIul4NpnX3Jojn+ScrSbS4m8il/5vzRnJGXKnRSzFw2bcBEJqor2OMDavMCmCULpePmm00Gt4VI72MOqsbVI=
ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=dkF8qjzE; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201
Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org;
	dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="dkF8qjzE"
Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EAD3BC4CEF1;
	Mon, 24 Nov 2025 19:36:48 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org;
	s=k20201202; t=1764013009;
	bh=OL3okPX96JuUPTbgrH0HQh3n0Y+t1xonvad58NS6QR0=;
	h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From;
	b=dkF8qjzEbL1qbsDR5Xhkoxw/RIUPsyEbr6e6nxVk1Ne513E4gFIfzKj7VHuO0fP8+
	 3MH1vnb37SJwWNOwjyDCu+xvNH64+FtYl5rCWGPm0om+tWdRKJIzuezSS+tlbFSQmO
	 QbkVcP1e/UAiNXJDLFlPRtWomXMJWk+63vtIsiM1FYYeSgxJb42oZPqnOMVp/vCPOA
	 RcR8Cu9yVxOK6LjIczast3OaNOjCNi+oEuK+EdrPX+zIeg3/Wm5dhZ4YHN7vwyW9CV
	 6CQVXyginIf0fg4dgvoUxI0tmCywVTbpKL2q9kfV2e6OdVb3VsAkuL8YReVFq6S1bS
	 JfjlHElfRX9LA==
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2025 12:36:47 -0700
From: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
To: Justin Tee <justintee8345@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	jsmart2021@gmail.com, justin.tee@broadcom.com,
	Daniel Wagner <wagi@kernel.org>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] nvme-fabrics: add ENOKEY to no retry criteria for
 authentication failures
Message-ID: <aSSzz0yCClwk2p47@kbusch-mbp>
References: <20251117184343.97605-1-justintee8345@gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:linux-kernel+subscribe@vger.kernel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:linux-kernel+unsubscribe@vger.kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20251117184343.97605-1-justintee8345@gmail.com>

On Mon, Nov 17, 2025 at 10:43:43AM -0800, Justin Tee wrote:
> With authentication, in addition to EKEYREJECTED there is also no point in
> retrying reconnects when status is ENOKEY.  Thus, add -ENOKEY as another
> criteria to determine when to stop retries.

Thanks, applied to nvme-6.19.