Re: [rft, PATCH v1 1/1] cpumask: Don't use "proxy" headers

Andy Shevchenko
2025-11-26T07:59:22Z

On Tue, Nov 25, 2025 at 12:42:23AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 04:17:51PM -0500, Yury Norov wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 09:39:59PM +0100, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
> > > Not fully compile tested, might give some compilation errors

...

> > > -#include <linux/cleanup.h>
> > > -#include <linux/kernel.h>
> >
> > I recall, removing kernel.h from cpumasks was a troublesome exercise
> > back then. But it may be my false memory.
>
> Yeah, there are several headers that are too tangled together.
> At least it builds on my configurations on x86_64.
>
> > Added this for testing in bitmap-for-next.
>
> Thanks, let's see how it will go. But note that it might fall the builds in
> some cases.

So, we survived already a couple of Linux Next integration builds, I believe
we are quite okay with this change and if anything appears, it can be fixed
in a followups.

Thanks!

--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko