From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30660207A0B for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2025 07:59:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1764143964; cv=none; b=E6CT7y6+jaTUVc4w8nTVn9JFKl/MApeA8RzwpXiAscqO0ACViz0a3SvufyC1lFzdDALuGgDNkbXBmEe5QMAmOZwbBLMpU0j8FFbFxvlej/wfOONzlQM4sq1U0j7K5xdpIamYUpv6EQYYP5/jClrtnEg0c7rYbHNOamom/46+4dA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1764143964; c=relaxed/simple; bh=aIdxHrfuW9MzlhhGHjhhp2nF8wCYyakfQucrQUwcEyg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=CgFUg6+ewWU6BfVAZJUWikKigCi7VWTOPIuEKYZcrlu+qbICP86Eoq/yidb7vfwUjZBO2tpcEr0x8ne7HH3Nu2x/tfMMT+x1DNonTa5/1rzJ6O+qzV0IEvU2BEO+TB9e9PubQtHbNuJLWtIw5qGx8uY8XVg4RuxMVJzyaW9AsR8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=Q1MWZB2P; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="Q1MWZB2P" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1764143963; x=1795679963; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=aIdxHrfuW9MzlhhGHjhhp2nF8wCYyakfQucrQUwcEyg=; b=Q1MWZB2P94YTQPCpOxMyt3YyN7kKWo3KEAd/6rrw8Jp7RyoGxrtx9Ddg eyuKOXOOdh27D4C/iZ8Xl0NvJMYYquBX7czLTwIuIHDWlWw+YlIzN97dL rUswy/8JdL6HvT1dAGytO5I9cc18bhqf0TzOTskNXp9Io+Ilwd2Lyaxs6 RO+4dYztf4J4ac9mN8S3qr6eeuZfoJG/NSJN69zGdiyC2d2LRUsgYwfrE FFbQC4tRzMe6SGOM0wmn2JyxKmtLdiQd3cLu5qgjgH5GD+88WrAAeP1Og s/tTUbCoDmEI02DmeAlPRxh9UxIC9QBsx31v5+31pdhMrKWQGQMPqBwT/ Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: bB91/oWRSS+eeiS+/ZJEug== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 8DzGpGzbQaG1zqgnVJRLEw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11624"; a="65360800" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.20,227,1758610800"; d="scan'208";a="65360800" Received: from orviesa006.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.146]) by fmvoesa112.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Nov 2025 23:59:22 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 0cyqaGeqSzuLt9Sb87UMVA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 4YkYS26JRDOpx2izM1f5vQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.20,227,1758610800"; d="scan'208";a="192007250" Received: from rvuia-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.245.89]) by orviesa006-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Nov 2025 23:59:19 -0800 Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2025 09:59:16 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Yury Norov Cc: Thomas Huth , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Rasmus Villemoes Subject: Re: [rft, PATCH v1 1/1] cpumask: Don't use "proxy" headers Message-ID: References: <20251124204128.1273728-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Tue, Nov 25, 2025 at 12:42:23AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 04:17:51PM -0500, Yury Norov wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 09:39:59PM +0100, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > Not fully compile tested, might give some compilation errors ... > > > -#include > > > -#include > > > > I recall, removing kernel.h from cpumasks was a troublesome exercise > > back then. But it may be my false memory. > > Yeah, there are several headers that are too tangled together. > At least it builds on my configurations on x86_64. > > > Added this for testing in bitmap-for-next. > > Thanks, let's see how it will go. But note that it might fall the builds in > some cases. So, we survived already a couple of Linux Next integration builds, I believe we are quite okay with this change and if anything appears, it can be fixed in a followups. Thanks! -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko