From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6BFE2BE7AA for ; Thu, 27 Nov 2025 15:30:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1764257451; cv=none; b=k79K6/0PspKhNWa1hoJ5GSR6IJ0aAgJ7QfElThS71YHpJckW4UPy9gG/A3vBga3Co6eLc+HmolDB0u+bpjKec7a3qfYv20ZmL5w3ptsLTXvrPkbl6aCivYnbOv+rUcK/b/XnPbcoNFpbFz0D4KyPYLTT/tetjI1douqaMwtNOHo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1764257451; c=relaxed/simple; bh=eJVd6NAolBl5kufmszOC+cJKZNvCOoI20oPB9L+KAm8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=rA4KEIe99wcFvCXa891sPoyDIde+tfk+tlgXvdZk0Xv0d1gE+3dnbi/uXRxU54YJ0QzD22OmN5BeHDWQpp8rFkZTrVdI6H/CxLu2FWckYMLHD0zx3LwoyND+Qy/ZwIUfxwpjsnxjODbblkjPUJFVYdmzUzqMuAo1VPm6RWdyKHc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=NbfpowJo; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="NbfpowJo" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1764257448; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=iUYE5Nv9stWS9k53Pjb2GiHfm7cAAwaViRSFXAZ3/B0=; b=NbfpowJoBSTnG/+S70Ozp452zfAP2fMUc4kE1CP4qKmsxAT7DNxM2Gb0rkXaG1ZK3Qc+p4 sXoDE07Di934tMQd22O7yRbd18IGaQX4p6jgMIh0pSATycyjgE/RjPIyjQcql/xj+03i9A DIY2NcaobeNd94nHbs5P1q2N7z2aLnc= Received: from mx-prod-mc-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-578-pxvj3IHcPoSYz_Fi9Nw39g-1; Thu, 27 Nov 2025 10:30:45 -0500 X-MC-Unique: pxvj3IHcPoSYz_Fi9Nw39g-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: pxvj3IHcPoSYz_Fi9Nw39g_1764257444 Received: from mx-prod-int-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA918195606F; Thu, 27 Nov 2025 15:30:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.72.112.7]) by mx-prod-int-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E965230001A4; Thu, 27 Nov 2025 15:30:40 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2025 23:30:36 +0800 From: Baoquan He To: Sourabh Jain , akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: Qiang Ma , kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, shivang upadhyay Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] kexec: print out debugging message if required for kexec_load Message-ID: References: <20251126084427.3222212-1-maqianga@uniontech.com> <7aadda55-d2a4-40f9-95ef-d284ec358646@linux.ibm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7aadda55-d2a4-40f9-95ef-d284ec358646@linux.ibm.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.30.177.4 On 11/27/25 at 05:31pm, Sourabh Jain wrote: > Hello All, > > Do we have plan to support KEXEC_DEBUG flag? > > Because upstream kexec-tools already added support for KEXEC_DEBUG flag > and that breaks the kexec_load with -d option. > > - kexec: add kexec flag to support debug printing > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/utils/kernel/kexec/kexec-tools.git/commit/?id=71d6fd99af7e I think we should revert that kexec-tools commit. This whole patchset is non-sense. Because of my carelessness, that userspace patch was merged. Hi Sourabh, Could you go through this patchset and help check if they are really needed? I can't find anything to convince myself. Thanks.