Re: [PATCH V4 01/27] kfifo: add kfifo_alloc_node() helper for NUMA awareness

[Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>]

On Sat, Nov 29, 2025 at 11:12:43AM -0800, Caleb Sander Mateos wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2025 at 5:59 PM Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Add __kfifo_alloc_node() by refactoring and reusing __kfifo_alloc(),
> > and define kfifo_alloc_node() macro to support NUMA-aware memory
> > allocation.
> >
> > The new __kfifo_alloc_node() function accepts a NUMA node parameter
> > and uses kmalloc_array_node() instead of kmalloc_array() for
> > node-specific allocation. The existing __kfifo_alloc() now calls
> > __kfifo_alloc_node() with NUMA_NO_NODE to maintain backward
> > compatibility.
> >
> > This enables users to allocate kfifo buffers on specific NUMA nodes,
> > which is important for performance in NUMA systems where the kfifo
> > will be primarily accessed by threads running on specific nodes.
> >
> > Cc: Stefani Seibold <stefani@seibold.net>
> > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  include/linux/kfifo.h | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> >  lib/kfifo.c           |  8 ++++----
> >  2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/kfifo.h b/include/linux/kfifo.h
> > index fd743d4c4b4b..8b81ac74829c 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/kfifo.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/kfifo.h
> > @@ -369,6 +369,30 @@ __kfifo_int_must_check_helper( \
> >  }) \
> >  )
> >
> > +/**
> > + * kfifo_alloc_node - dynamically allocates a new fifo buffer on a NUMA node
> > + * @fifo: pointer to the fifo
> > + * @size: the number of elements in the fifo, this must be a power of 2
> > + * @gfp_mask: get_free_pages mask, passed to kmalloc()
> > + * @node: NUMA node to allocate memory on
> > + *
> > + * This macro dynamically allocates a new fifo buffer with NUMA node awareness.
> > + *
> > + * The number of elements will be rounded-up to a power of 2.
> > + * The fifo will be release with kfifo_free().
> > + * Return 0 if no error, otherwise an error code.
> > + */
> > +#define kfifo_alloc_node(fifo, size, gfp_mask, node) \
> > +__kfifo_int_must_check_helper( \
> > +({ \
> > +       typeof((fifo) + 1) __tmp = (fifo); \
> > +       struct __kfifo *__kfifo = &__tmp->kfifo; \
> > +       __is_kfifo_ptr(__tmp) ? \
> > +       __kfifo_alloc_node(__kfifo, size, sizeof(*__tmp->type), gfp_mask, node) : \
> > +       -EINVAL; \
> > +}) \
> > +)
> 
> Looks like we could avoid some code duplication by defining
> kfifo_alloc(fifo, size, gfp_mask) as kfifo_alloc_node(fifo, size,
> gfp_mask, NUMA_NO_NODE). Otherwise, this looks good to me.

It is just a single-line inline, and shouldn't introduce any code
duplication. Switching to kfifo_alloc_node() doesn't change result of
`size vmlinux` actually.



Thanks,
Ming