From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DB0B2F0C7C for ; Sat, 13 Dec 2025 10:00:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765620015; cv=none; b=T+Qa3Q3aQlgFKyjttSPvdB2uQS9YRW98f22efr6Xi34x0OZeI5un6LE/dYkioKgxwt4t7O8LDOLjCt5Pv6WpdfQend1+qfbf8yg6x8D/MW1HuOK0a6PoPTKkdnpEG3oVHH9exF6m9WGhAW3U7bWUusBO/Vf4nj/VerpkjTmgFz4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765620015; c=relaxed/simple; bh=iiSHjEGbDa4VeWMqbOjNqcAET9M1tnLknvW/pC6MtKU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=pT3AVScFdfy4ZSguvqzgAvEZuu928vvMZ7P9lJxwG7WMtW13J6onXmcQjLTnjh/t/CrrH3kt4MV6ctgaJlrik6pJ6RU1MpmMJGeuFh7FciXK0KQVf9xPc8NZ01ohqdUD47SiaScruvbBAHvmNl17RkvzM24PpkzuyvNbJzhGHqk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=SmLckeT2; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="SmLckeT2" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DBCEDC16AAE; Sat, 13 Dec 2025 10:00:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1765620015; bh=iiSHjEGbDa4VeWMqbOjNqcAET9M1tnLknvW/pC6MtKU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=SmLckeT2jm9hYPeOJsUb2/2d4PqoLsHwjI6oubawO0HONiio3cAtAIWw5hBDTyU6c E/mRG0c0HEFW42eFWudsnMpdVlvnpviwlT0dOXwRKWlCifD5R5BIUmWaFWIrGYW4+a xd5RuDPQjW5EpZnTx65H0xwwylHAm/T/2gVsVznljfstMhEOMpqGxRFMuiKADoToGm pTrEpNbxdieIB9AyR0Hg08IOux7o00dO1EX+YKMc3tVGp1qhyazbMuXLjaceAJl9IB WoUkwMZlJeGkn5IDrWD5Necl4MkzS3QsvFnx5s7dIm6gLR91ZiXsR8gebkaqqH7Erm hpTmS6Z6pJVZA== Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2025 11:00:11 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, the arch/x86 maintainers , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86 fixes Message-ID: References: <20251212143136.GAaTwnSOOUSU4VsZKY@renoirsky.local> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251212143136.GAaTwnSOOUSU4VsZKY@renoirsky.local> * Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Fri, Dec 12, 2025 at 10:43:36AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > Yazen Ghannam (1): > > x86/acpi/boot: Correct acpi_is_processor_usable() check again > > This one was supposed to stay for a whole cycle in tip - *even* *if* it is > stable material. Yeah, but that's not really how we apply -stable tags. If it's good for -stable, it's good for Linus's tree, full stop. The last I saw from this patch was that you wrote this a month ago: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251114165358.GCaRdepiZOYK9DlcSc@fat_crate.local > Borislav Petkov wrote: | Thanks a lot! It looks good in my testing too, so far. | | I'll queue it soon. And it's been in -next ever since. Anyway, Linus, if you haven't pulled this yet then please belay this pull request, I'll move this patch back into tip:x86/boot and remove the misapplied -stable tag. Thanks, Ingo