From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
To: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@linux.dev>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/sgx: Use goto to remove redundant if check in sgx_encl_init
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2025 21:11:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aT26Vva7f9ZdVEn8@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A07D996-F409-4796-B02C-E8D39335B599@linux.dev>
On Fri, Dec 12, 2025 at 10:05:00PM +0100, Thorsten Blum wrote:
> On 11. Dec 2025, at 21:15, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 11, 2025 at 10:03:56PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> >> On Wed, Dec 10, 2025 at 04:48:08PM +0100, Thorsten Blum wrote:
> >>> On 10. Dec 2025, at 16:32, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> >>>> On Wed, Dec 10, 2025 at 02:00:35PM +0100, Thorsten Blum wrote:
> >>>>> Immediately break out of both loops when 'ret != SGX_UNMASKED_EVENT'
> >>>>> instead of checking for the same condition again in the outer loop.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@linux.dev>
> >>>>> ---
> >>>>> [...]
> >>>>
> >>>> I don't think moving code around is very useful.
> >>>
> >>> The patch doesn't actually move any code around, but it removes up to 50
> >>> (SGX_EINIT_SLEEP_COUNT) duplicate and therefore unnecessary if checks in
> >>> the outer for loop.
> >>
> >> Temporary change for generating disassembly:
> >> [...]
> >
> > It pretty much does what I said i.e., shuffles a new location for a code block.
>
> GCC emits a much larger diff; however, discussing the patch based solely
> on the disassembled code probably isn't very meaningful.
It does close the "does nothing useful" claim. It really does nothing
useful.
>
> Thanks,
> Thorsten
>
>
BR, Jarkko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-13 19:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-10 13:00 [PATCH] x86/sgx: Use goto to remove redundant if check in sgx_encl_init Thorsten Blum
2025-12-10 15:32 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2025-12-10 15:48 ` Thorsten Blum
2025-12-11 20:03 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2025-12-11 20:15 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2025-12-12 21:05 ` Thorsten Blum
2025-12-13 19:11 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2025-12-13 19:14 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aT26Vva7f9ZdVEn8@kernel.org \
--to=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thorsten.blum@linux.dev \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).