From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: James Le Cuirot <chewi@gentoo.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: fix oops caused by old EFI info on kexec boot
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 19:12:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aTB9py7V-jpDIqJJ@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251126173209.374755-2-chewi@gentoo.org>
* James Le Cuirot <chewi@gentoo.org> wrote:
> kexec on x86 passes initrd details via the boot_params. If no initrd is
> supplied, then ramdisk_size is 0. When determining whether to reserve
> memory for the initrd on the subsequent boot, ramdisk_size being 0
> causes the logic to fall back to phys_initrd_start and phys_initrd_size
> set from the EFI tables in efi.c. This is stale information from the
> initial boot. The system continues to boot and has even been seen to
> function under heavy load for days, but allocating very large amounts of
> memory reliably triggers an oops rather than the OOM killer.
>
> BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000008
> #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode
> #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page
> PGD 0 P4D 0
> Oops: Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP NOPTI
>
> This issue was introduced in f4dc7fffa9873db50ec25624572f8217a6225de8
> when the EFI stub initrd loading was unified between architectures.
>
> Avoid the issue by checking whether the bootloader is not kexec before
> falling back to the EFI table values.
>
> I strongly suspect this also affects other architectures. A different
> fix would be required there, and I do have a fix in mind, but I was
> unable to reproduce the issue under QEMU's aarch64 virt machine. I think
> this is at least partly because it relies on ACPI while kexec passes the
> initd details via the device tree.
>
> Signed-off-by: James Le Cuirot <chewi@gentoo.org>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> index 1b2edd07a3e1..8aa65daf121f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -300,7 +300,8 @@ static u64 __init get_ramdisk_image(void)
>
> ramdisk_image |= (u64)boot_params.ext_ramdisk_image << 32;
>
> - if (ramdisk_image == 0)
> + /* Don't fall back for kexec as phys_initrd_start will be stale */
> + if (ramdisk_image == 0 && (boot_params.hdr.type_of_loader >> 4) != 0xD)
> ramdisk_image = phys_initrd_start;
>
> return ramdisk_image;
> @@ -311,7 +312,8 @@ static u64 __init get_ramdisk_size(void)
>
> ramdisk_size |= (u64)boot_params.ext_ramdisk_size << 32;
>
> - if (ramdisk_size == 0)
> + /* Don't fall back for kexec as phys_initrd_start will be stale */
> + if (ramdisk_size == 0 && (boot_params.hdr.type_of_loader >> 4) != 0xD)
> ramdisk_size = phys_initrd_size;
Yeah, so this looks like a good fix - but please let's
introduce some sort of enum for the bootloader IDs
in arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/bootparam.h, I had to search
way too long to figure out what 0xD is and where it
was defined :-)
Also, please introduce a "x86_bootloader_is_kexec()" kind
of helper inline function as well.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-03 18:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-26 17:32 [PATCH] x86: fix oops caused by old EFI info on kexec boot James Le Cuirot
2025-12-03 18:12 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2025-12-03 20:59 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-12-03 21:27 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-12-06 11:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-12-03 22:57 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-12-03 23:01 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-12-04 21:40 ` James Le Cuirot
2025-12-04 23:18 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aTB9py7V-jpDIqJJ@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=chewi@gentoo.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox