From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A101933033F for ; Wed, 3 Dec 2025 15:59:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1764777589; cv=none; b=R9LrjLjNZQG0ERuKv4N851UIgLlshmU7y5wWsDa0Cx+eQ9EHSRzCszn6rr/Jc2gajeOI0ctaQBAl7nh4IJBoH8NMxMiKsv4EmJTzOARl1SXld6QscfBp7HlMLWm4CQ1j26UU7Hf7exCHt0dlscdVjD65s6E0jgF5r7n077Kf688= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1764777589; c=relaxed/simple; bh=rrus+AEDyWJtHQya3wCQmAymtrlLQG69l0PSCJ9ex4w=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Beuv89tJ71kg9ofwVSnXnE8QN/f5gL6Dz30AVc1NQkfqKn9DNx1lFdVYwOuOrvJs1p8PEsE6u9lPBnXMBm3aWEsvz2U4hasltzPHjR73V9e0zWS4B+LCa9L75fPkWDWr7iMbluWql96FQC0GNwB4SFiye0Ny4WufrLr86gc1m2k= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=G1QAQYDZ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="G1QAQYDZ" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4806AC116B1; Wed, 3 Dec 2025 15:59:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1764777589; bh=rrus+AEDyWJtHQya3wCQmAymtrlLQG69l0PSCJ9ex4w=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=G1QAQYDZnbX52p9GnvFfST88sZjj4PZkCDeqDy1Alm92VnYWUbnWNkQGMyYDfkVDs JEMMV1LjW8J3cG0/iJ2t//83fhFGfHfg1JG1lLCZlE6hsk2slXAqFpEkWB5GoDYlBF Vr/eAY+p3wXeOZ+4QbDxnXaHpNexi1WIxRfseedrshKnIfdKu2l8r6Lfnf/90hzZUs J6ealHUUI6qul6D+kXdlu96As1AetOGkhSjz0U6IEXoie2FQNn8TgARUXqizXjwB8/ O00EVaLxvTochb8BBrE+8frQzRwfFWTAjixpjiBk6FEhPEVTL2f4Vc3d4EUCVjA3/3 e8cVVQ/yFcFvg== Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2025 16:59:45 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Josh Poimboeuf , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] objtool: Improve code generation for annotation macros Message-ID: References: <20251126100050.GT4067720@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251126100050.GT4067720@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> * Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, Nov 25, 2025 at 10:06:56PM -0800, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > > For tip/objtool/core. > > > > As much as possible, undo the code generation damage introduced by > > ANNOTATE_DATA_SPECIAL: > > > > - Remove its usage in favor of SHF_MERGE + sh_entsize, where possible > > > > - Print the annotation on a single line: > > > > 912: .pushsection ".discard.annotate_data", "M", @progbits, 8; .long 912b - .; .long 1; .popsection > > > > - Remove the trailing newline/tab; let the invoking code decide on the > > appropriate separator for the given context > > > > Josh Poimboeuf (4): > > x86/alternative: Remove ANNOTATE_DATA_SPECIAL usage > > x86/asm: Remove ANNOTATE_DATA_SPECIAL usage > > objtool: Consolidate annotation macros > > objtool: Remove newlines and tabs from annotation macros > > Durr, this will conflict with tip/core/bugs. Let me ponder this a bit. So Josh has resolved these conflicts based on latest -git which has all these moving pieces integrated into a single tree, so I've applied these fixes to tip:objtool/urgent. Thanks, Ingo