From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.zeus03.de (zeus03.de [194.117.254.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1676D3191DC for ; Fri, 5 Dec 2025 11:34:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1764934455; cv=none; b=KD5yzN8qr+Fy7hHj3YW9ZMSIzrO3/zGKXqrNufEr8lkF7L8zK40+o94r1sK1UtR8gdq3+lucL+w/ZfSgFQzSW8/9AOnLCyg9I/ON0zaDLzb9sF307Ilz9hCMlaL09v36+a6O15V21Hy+8sINMEIzEjFceUHx1xbGfAhf5rpGscw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1764934455; c=relaxed/simple; bh=sYLE9vX7YLW5uLv6TztiBzQp5HwHQuChB7rW//a4UU0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=RIebvo8dTDapq+42qa87G6ijMSODjl4cDSxMlYe7zzgHyeu9SshHu7juGL3hw5wV6ErDDRchXaRnlvcK67G8ixI/zQ6DVGRScu40Msy2UGKP5t1zc/1d1DyVLPoXSFZ+52iiOF80wj2PoXlkhVgshq6d2R2ZqHTjhBF+cl4rh2Q= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b=MLX+UEHg; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b="MLX+UEHg" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= sang-engineering.com; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=k1; bh=yze3 YCp0+sBBf56Bnh1eGa/kXUMojVusKYPMxclyawU=; b=MLX+UEHgE2wsqLfg6HIC NB5AzJ7FL3gJTwIMLzriDu4Kk1AEC/bEXL3ykWhTBjpPSLIX3PGcysyX/gE8x3HY zG4p4hbOMpeq0529L8ZeIIfEhlzPe2jton2Ji3TXcqDBaf4NVDske+/RkUg2f+BU L8bQbqcuoBmOhj1J8PwD4kxcwA35F1exN3CK+2YaL/o8lRcQFtUvdQcofhJIHim6 zApPwG5qQsQyibsWZwbQbHxOZXPy0gtqgtWjeUpnFocJiI5MQC00pKBU7NVKxxSa PAesa4HcYEw+hIE0XYV72m9enSkt3PqLe4sBIt4PavbEzzD4B6/iWpBNM1jWX9nH Fg== Received: (qmail 1485678 invoked from network); 5 Dec 2025 12:34:00 +0100 Received: by mail.zeus03.de with UTF8SMTPSA (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted, authenticated); 5 Dec 2025 12:34:00 +0100 X-UD-Smtp-Session: l3s3148p1@v1M+0jJFoISZ4zxJ Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2025 20:33:56 +0900 From: Wolfram Sang To: Andi Shyti Cc: linux-i2c , lkml Subject: Re: i2c-host for v6.18 Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xYX06v+zU457WQoV" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: --xYX06v+zU457WQoV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Andi, > here is the pull request for this cycle. I was hoping it would be > more substantial, but I ran into a nasty issue with my gpg setup > that blocked me from pushing to kernel.org for several weeks. The > kernel.org helpdesk helped me sort it out, but unfortunately a > bit too late, so this is all I managed to gather in time. Things happen. Don't worry about this one... > I am sorry for the disruption. I will set up a backup solution so > that I can avoid this problem in the future. Another tree at gitlab maybe? > The following changes since commit 7d0a66e4bb9081d75c82ec4957c50034cb0ea4= 49: >=20 > Linux 6.18 (2025-11-30 14:42:10 -0800) Urgs, but this is highly problematic. I can't pull something based on 6.18. Usually, things are based on -rc1 or something early to show Linus that it has been in -next for a while. He won't pull something that is less than 48 hours in public and so won't I. I hope you still have the ref of the branch *before* you rebased to 6.18. Please send a pull request for this old one. And I am quite sure I said it before: Please *do* *not* rebase branches you have published which are meant to be consumed! Other people (me!) depend on their stability and history. In very rare cases, sometimes a commit needs to be modified or deleted. But the base should really stay the base. If you need a newer one (also rare), merge it. Not pulled, sorry. Wolfram --xYX06v+zU457WQoV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEOZGx6rniZ1Gk92RdFA3kzBSgKbYFAmkywyAACgkQFA3kzBSg KbbVLRAAjJ2YbR5y7/PuInLtFfS2nmb5N1MsrXOWlaHXTAIgn3hj2UcDxyZi5/Yc Gvzmbax2WqZN+UxeI85xf7NzWUbp6agO4z2A6f68GstDn8qliBBV+NLUaca03Wow UNxdfGDxpdz0btJGhICGYYsTrVY3oNR1u2lQT5QovALmmBSXRrgQ8Zla4vFD9WXS YfNzCjlAE5PMIMNM+GZ+Wj0Rsx4QFBNmbyo2paAXjKlGGYPB99TgA3dw2QVQEyGS mbc2HQPQ76fF+RBA50pDH2UsBX5ViGLqrVWnvETPIydvJ6mTPhq94JWHcYoVD2D0 IGq8vx8ZPS1uQ6yCJzsx9ltkLPE79HnHUIrKY7tBpFMTTWPvtpO0V7QbYdzoTLre M8q71VQmwtgPU8UNlQTAfhN3kdUCOhE5f49N7JuhlpoPghFfYujtjlI/bAy6LFZI fmXguCdOG59Y70akQQjmTyN9iKV8fiY/meqou0LS4+27o66YLIp4jtw+H6eTw/7F LbgG8ml8Lb+1c/hnuRY30trLk1G8BC1mmcaXUZ6XYg8j+ZpUoZNvtaUAsZjVtZpR 9l+ia0psxVGjyLUcHCLSEUfEeW59aaKhqO9Gihx1LHo7aExzMeAV1UR3bf7ATMHX gnN8ipesAdcYhFj1B/tfRoU4AYdxf9zXOhiMgDAhthTLuYbI4mo= =TViW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --xYX06v+zU457WQoV--