public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: William Breathitt Gray <wbg@kernel.org>
To: Haotian Zhang <vulab@iscas.ac.cn>
Cc: andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] counter: 104-quad-8: Fix incorrect return value in IRQ handler
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2025 13:24:16 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aTOv8GxTcWRR39y7@emerald> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251202083952.1975-1-vulab@iscas.ac.cn>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1684 bytes --]

On Tue, Dec 02, 2025 at 04:39:52PM +0800, Haotian Zhang wrote:
> quad8_irq_handler() should return irqreturn_t enum values, but it
> directly returns negative errno codes from regmap operations on error.
> 
> Return IRQ_NONE instead of raw errno codes on regmap operation failures.
> 
> Fixes: 98ffe0252911 ("counter: 104-quad-8: Migrate to the regmap API")
> Signed-off-by: Haotian Zhang <vulab@iscas.ac.cn>
> ---
>  drivers/counter/104-quad-8.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/counter/104-quad-8.c b/drivers/counter/104-quad-8.c
> index ce81fc4e1ae7..17f4da6c24af 100644
> --- a/drivers/counter/104-quad-8.c
> +++ b/drivers/counter/104-quad-8.c
> @@ -1201,7 +1201,7 @@ static irqreturn_t quad8_irq_handler(int irq, void *private)
> 
>  	ret = regmap_read(priv->map, QUAD8_INTERRUPT_STATUS, &status);
>  	if (ret)
> -		return ret;
> +		return IRQ_NONE;
>  	if (!status)
>  		return IRQ_NONE;
> 
> @@ -1233,7 +1233,7 @@ static irqreturn_t quad8_irq_handler(int irq, void *private)
> 
>  	ret = regmap_write(priv->map, QUAD8_CHANNEL_OPERATION, CLEAR_PENDING_INTERRUPTS);
>  	if (ret)
> -		return ret;
> +		return IRQ_NONE;
> 
>  	return IRQ_HANDLED;
>  }

Hello Haotian,

You are correct, we should return a value of irqreturn_t and not raw
errno codes. However, it would be nice to indicate to users why the IRQ
was left unserviced before return IRQ_NONE. Is there a way to indicate
the regmap_read failure, perhaps via WARN_ONCE() or similar? Is
regmap_read actually capable of failing in this context, or should we
just remove the conditional check entirely?

William Breathitt Gray

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2025-12-06  4:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <tQ6gupeNR5WXy61K0UZmDNzA2jlqAjibu-EqYV_XRtlg9D0x97yhFy6HUvzN7vLm6DePuDcSVd_qZ_lqin6_8Q==@protonmail.internalid>
2025-12-02  8:39 ` [PATCH] counter: 104-quad-8: Fix incorrect return value in IRQ handler Haotian Zhang
2025-12-06  4:24   ` William Breathitt Gray [this message]
2025-12-06 16:30     ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-12-06 18:00   ` [PATCH v2] " Haotian Zhang
2025-12-12  3:34     ` William Breathitt Gray
2025-12-12 15:04       ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-12-15  2:01   ` [PATCH v3] " Haotian Zhang
2025-12-22 11:06     ` William Breathitt Gray

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aTOv8GxTcWRR39y7@emerald \
    --to=wbg@kernel.org \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vulab@iscas.ac.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox