From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
Michael Walle <mwalle@kernel.org>,
Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>,
Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
Steam Lin <STLin2@winbond.com>, Santhosh Kumar K <s-k6@ti.com>,
linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 5/8] spi: spi-mem: Create a secondary read operation
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2025 11:06:11 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aTonE4REBDfaWBQo@sirena.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251205-winbond-v6-18-rc1-cont-read-v1-5-01bc48631c73@bootlin.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 558 bytes --]
On Fri, Dec 05, 2025 at 08:38:56PM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> The choice of defining two variables named primary and secondary instead
> of using an array of templates is on purpose, to simplify the reading. I
> find less obvious the use of an array here but this is personal taste.
This makes sense to me:
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Feel free to carry both these patches along with the rest of the
series, if/when you do end up applying it a signed tag would probably be
a good idea in case there's some collision with other SPI work.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-11 2:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-05 19:38 [PATCH RFC 0/8] mtd: spinand: Winbond continuous read support Miquel Raynal
2025-12-05 19:38 ` [PATCH RFC 1/8] mtd: spinand: Drop a too strong limitation Miquel Raynal
2025-12-05 19:38 ` [PATCH RFC 2/8] mtd: spinand: Expose spinand_op_is_odtr() Miquel Raynal
2025-12-05 19:38 ` [PATCH RFC 3/8] mtd: spinand: Drop ECC dirmaps Miquel Raynal
2025-12-05 19:38 ` [PATCH RFC 4/8] spi: spi-mem: Transform the read operation template Miquel Raynal
2025-12-11 2:03 ` Mark Brown
2025-12-05 19:38 ` [PATCH RFC 5/8] spi: spi-mem: Create a secondary read operation Miquel Raynal
2025-12-11 2:06 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2025-12-11 14:19 ` Miquel Raynal
2025-12-05 19:38 ` [PATCH RFC 6/8] mtd: spinand: Use secondary ops for continuous reads Miquel Raynal
2025-12-05 19:38 ` [PATCH RFC 7/8] mtd: spinand: winbond: Add support for continuous reads on W35NxxJW Miquel Raynal
2025-12-05 19:38 ` [PATCH RFC 8/8] mtd: spinand: winbond: Add support for continuous reads on W25NxxJW Miquel Raynal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aTonE4REBDfaWBQo@sirena.co.uk \
--to=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=STLin2@winbond.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=mwalle@kernel.org \
--cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=s-k6@ti.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=tudor.ambarus@linaro.org \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox